Diagnostic Value of Blood Oxygen Saturation and
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) in Predicting Lung Sequels
in COVID-19 Infected Patients Admitted to Hospital: A
12-week Cohort Study
Samaneh Abiri 1, Mina Mohammadizadeh 2, Lohrasb Taheri 1, Seyed Reza Mousavi 3, Masihallah Shakeri 1, Elahe
Rahmanian 1, Naser Hatami 2, Erfan Ghanbarzadeh 4, Zhila Rahmanian 1, Navid Kalani 1
1 Research Center for Non-communicable Diseases, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Spine Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Chamran Hospital, Namazi Teaching
Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran
4 Student Research Committee, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Guilan, Iran
Correspondence to:
Zhila Rahmanian, Assistant Professor of Internal Medi-
cine, Research Center for Non-communicable Diseases,
Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran.
Telephone Number: 0098+9177916175
Email Address: dr.j.rahmanian@gmail.com
Received 2022-09-15
Revised 2022-11-18
Accepted 2022-11-29
Abstract
Background: Evidence of COVID-19 respiratory sequels is restricted and predisposing factors
are not well studied more than two years passing pandemic. This study followed COVID-19
patients 12 weeks after discharge from hospital for respiratory sequels. Materials and Meth-
ods: This was a prospective study on discharged COVID-19 patients in 2021, in Jahrom, Iran.
Exposure was COVID-19 clinical features at hospitalization, including symptoms and physi-
cal examination and laboratory ndings, and primary endpoint was 12-week lung sequel, be-
ing evaluated by a chest CT scan. Demographics and previous medical history were consid-
ered covariates. SPO2 and CRP 6-week changes were followed as an early tool for prediction
of 12-week lung sequel. Results: Totally, 383 participants (17 had sequels) with mean age
of 57.43±18.03 years old (50.13% male) completed 12-week study follow-ups. Ninety-one
(23.8%) subjects had an ICU admission history. SPO2% in 6th week was statistically signi-
cantly associated with a higher rate of 12-week sequelae (p<0.001). Also, patients having CT
scan scores between 40% to 50% (p=0.012) and higher than 50% (p=0.040) had higher chance
of experiencing lung sequelae than patients with CT scan score of below 40%, as well as having
ICU admission history and lower SPO2% at 6th week of discharge. There was a statistically
signicant increasing trend of SPO2% (P<0.001) and a statistically signicant decreasing trend
of CRP levels (P<0.001), overall. SPO2% increase after 6 weeks was lower in participants with
lung sequels than fully improved ones (P=0.002) and as well as total 12-week change in SPO2%
(P=0.001). CRP changes in none of evaluated periods were dierent among study groups
(P>0.05). Conclusion: Our results were in favor of closely following SPO2 levels after patient
discharge, while CRP assessment seems not helpful based on our results [GMJ.2023;12:e2695]
DOI:10.31661/gmj.v12i.2695
Keywords: Lung; Respiratory; COVID-19; Oxygen
GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
GMJ
Copyright© 2021, Galen Medical Journal.
This is an open-access article distributed
under the terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution 4.0 International License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Email:info@gmj.ir
Abiri S, et al. Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels
2GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
Introduction
Survivors of the previous coronaviruses of
SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV are reported
to experience persistent physiological defects
and abnormal radiology ndings associated
with pulmonary brosis[1, 2]. Long radiolog-
ical sequalaes of COVID-19 are also investi-
gated in research [3].
Months after passing the disease course in
hospitals, survivors might experience unre-
stored radiological ndings as well as mosaic
hypoattenuation [3], ground-glass opacities,
Interlobular septal thickening, and reticula-
tion [4].
Longitudinal studies of COVID-19 sequalaes
have focused on dierent physical and func-
tional consequences; while these studies are
restricted to not having the baseline data of
more advanced tests in follow-ups like pul-
monary function tests and functional exercise
capacity [5] and small number of participants.
Based on a meta-analysis performed by Hunt-
ley et al. suggested abnormal chest CT scan
ndings in both severe and mild cases [6].
Risk factors of pulmonary decreased function
and lung radiological pathology in the largest
cohort of COVID-19 survivors were stratied
based on the need for oxygen supplementa-
tion during the hospitalization, reecting the
severity of the disease [5].
Other potential risk factors of having remained
or progressive lung damage is less evaluated
and there is no available hallmark or biomark-
er predicting lung sequalaes .
Salem et al.’s three month cohort for fol-
low up of some biomarkers as well as ESR,
platlet count, and D-dimer, was unable to
nd any assosiation with lung sequales [7].
In this study, we aimed to evaluate the base-
line clinical factors of COVID-19 hospital-
ization course with 12 week lung squeal.
Materials and Methods
This was a prospective cohort study per-
formed on COVID-19 patients who were hos-
pitalized in wards of the Peymanieh Hospital
in Jahrom, South of Iran, in 2021. The proto-
col of this work was authorized with code of
“IR.JUMS.REC.1400.036”, by the ethics in
research committee of the Jahrom University
of Medical Sciences. All participants signed
the informed consent form.
Study population
Sampling was conducted based on the sim-
ple-available method from patients being ad-
mitted to oor wards. Based on a study with
3.13% radiological lung sequel [8], with an
alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%, anticipating
6% lung sequel in our samples, 357 partici-
pants were needed as sample size, based on
the formula for the prospective study [9].
Inclusion criteria were being hospitalized
for COVID-19 and getting discharged after
recovery. Also satisfaction for attendance in
recalls at 6 and 12 weeks after discharge in
the recruitment center was required for re-
cruitment. COVID-19 was conrmed by nasal
swap using polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
test.
As we have used High-resolution comput-
ed tomography (HRCT) scan at 12 weeks of
follow-up, only patients with baseline CT
scan records were recruited. Exclusion crite-
ria were death and not attending follow-ups.
Patients who had a new respiratory disease,
infectious disease, or acute chest syndrome
during the 12 weeks of study were also ex-
cluded.
To exclude long COVID-19 or reinfection,
patients were followed by a nasal swab PCR
test performed at 6th and 12th week of dis-
charge, and positive cases were excluded.
We recruited 458 patients. Finally, 383 sub-
jects completed both 6 and 12-week fol-
low-ups with 16.37% loss to follow-up rate.
Study outcomes
Exposure was COVID-19 clinical features
at hospitalization. These features includ-
ed symptomatology, physical examinations
(PHEs), laboratory data, past medical history
(PMHx), and demographic data.
Symptoms were recorded based on the pa-
tient reported signs. PHEs were performed
by a general practitioner and blood oxygen
saturation (SPO2%) was measured at admis-
sion time. It was measured by the same Pulse
Oximeter device for all patients (BPL Medi-
cal Technologies, India). Heart echocardiog-
raphy was conducted if indicated by a cardi-
ologist and cardiac ejection fraction rate was
Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels Abiri S, et al.
GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
3
recorded. Laboratory data on CRP levels were
recorded in rst blood samples taken at ad-
mission. A baseline HRCT was conducted if
indicated by the general practitioners request.
A semi-quantitative CT severity scoring [10]
was applied based on the radiologist’s report.
SPO2 measurement
Patients were recommended to give rest their
bodies for at least 10 minutes before measur-
ing their blood oxygen level. Then, they had
to sit up straight, relax, and keep their hands
close to the level of heart. the Pulse Oximeter
was placed on the tip of index nger, direct-
ly on the skin on the index nger of the right
hand above the nails and patient had to not
move at all while measuring. 3 such measure-
ments were performed and highest one was
recorded.
Outcome
12-week lung sequalae was the primary out-
come of this study. A chest CT scan was con-
ducted 12 weeks after discharge and reported
by the radiologist for any lung abnormality.
CRP levels were evaluated at 6 week fol-
low-up and at 12th week of discharge along
with the SPO2% measurement.
Statistical analysis
Description of study variables was expressed
by frequency (relative frequency%) for di-
chotomous variables and mean±SD for con-
tinuous ones. We stratied data based on the
quartiles of the CT scan score [Q1: 25th quan-
tile. Q3: 75th quantile] and having or not hav-
ing lung sequalae in 12th week.
Univariable statistical analyses were per-
formed comparing study variables within the
quartiles of the CT scan score or presence of
lung sequalae at 12 weeks by independent
T-test and Mann-Whitney, ANOVA and Kru-
skal–Wallis for continuous variables and Chi-
square or sher exact test for binary data.
Repeated measures analysis was conducted
to compare data of time-varying variables in
3-time endpoints of T0, or initial referral to
hospital, T6 at 6 weeks after discharge from
the hospital, and T12 at 12 weeks after dis-
charge.
Multivariate analyses were conducted by
assuming lung sequelae at 12th week as the
primary outcome using the Cox regression.
Variables that had a P value of around 0.2
in univariable comparison of study groups
(based on the lung sequalae) were included in
multivariate analyses.
A Forest plot of Cox regression was used to
visualize the Hazzard ratio (HR) for each
comparison. Changes in SPO2 and CRP were
calculated and dened as new variables for
dierent periods and were compared by inde-
pendent T-test between the groups. All statis-
tical analyses were performed by IBM SPSS
Statistics for Windows, version 21 (IBM
Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA). Data were visu-
alized using GraphPad Prism for Windows,
version 8.4 (GraphPad Inc., San Diego, Cal-
ifornia, USA).
Results
In this study, 383 participants were includ-
ed with mean age of 57.43±18.03 years old.
There were 192(50.13%) male subjects.
39.16% of participants had previous cardiac
diseases as the most prevalent PMHx; while
35.51% were known as previously healthy.
Dyspnea and cough were most common
symptoms (Table-1).Univariable analysis re-
vealed that all ICU admissions were counted
in patients with CT scan score in 4th quartile,
showing a statistically signicant dierence
(P<0.001).
Also, patients having 4th quartile CT scan
score had the least SPO2% at arrival, com-
pared to other quartiles (P<0.05); while hav-
ing the highest CRP levels compared to lower
quartiles of CT scan score (P<0.05).
There were 366 subjects with no remaining
problems in lung and 17 subjects were expe-
riencing lung sequels. None of the compared
variables were dierent in comparison of the
patients experiencing lung sequalae versus
completely improved ones, except the ICU
admission rate that was higher in patients
with 12-week sequalae compared to subjects
with no lung sequel (52.94% versus 22.4%;
P=0.0007), as shown in table 1.
There was a statistically signicant increasing
trend of SPO2% (P<0.001) overall and a sta-
tistically signicant decreasing trend of CRP
levels (P<0.001). The type of sequalaes was
Reticular in 4 subjects, Septal in 4, Cystic in
4GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
Abiri S, et al. Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels
6, and brosis in 3 subjects.
Multivariable analysis considering the 12-
week sequalae as the outcome was performed
based on the Cox regression. Figure-1 is
showing the HR of each variable for 12-week
sequalae. Lower SPO2% in 6th week was
statistically signicantly associated with a
higher rate of 12-week sequalae (HR=0.753
[CI95%, 0.684 to 0.828], P<0.001) versus
the baseline and 12th week SPO2% (P>0.05).
CRP levels in none of the evaluated timelines
were predictive of lung sequels (P>0.05).
Also, patients having CT scan scores in quar-
tile 2 (HR=0.110 [CI95%, 0.020 to 0.618],
P=0.012) and 4 (HR= 0.0.102 [CI95%, 0.11
to 0.902], P=0.040) had a higher chance of
experiencing lung sequalae than quartile 1, as
shown in Figure-1.
Having ICU admission history was associated
with an increased chance of experiencing lung
sequalae (HR=0.158 [CI95%, 0.429 to 0.058],
P<0.001).
Based on Figure-2, the amount of SPO2%
increase after 6 weeks was lower in partici-
pants with lung sequels than fully improved
ones (P=0.002) and as well as the total 12-
week change in the SPO2% (P=0.001); while
between the 6th and 12th week after disease,
SPO2% does not change dierently among
Figure 1. Forest plot of Cox regression for 12th week lung sequelae
NE: not estimated; Q: quartile; PMHx: past medical history; PHE: physical examination.
The plot was visualized by GraphPad Prism 8.
GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
5
Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels Abiri S, et al.
study groups (P=0.783). CRP changes in none
of evaluated periods were dierent among
study groups (P>0.05).
Discussion
Our study was a relatively large sampled-sized
cohort of COVID-19 survivors for a Medi-
um-term follow-up period. We found critical
COVID-19 patients to be at risk of higher
chance of remaining lung radiologic patholo-
gy than mild and moderate patients after about
3 months; while none of clinical factors relat-
ed to pre-existing medical conditions or man-
ifestations at arrival for hospitalization were
related. This nding is logically conrmed by
many research papers [7].
But the most important nding of this study
is the incidence of lung sequalaes in non-
ICU admitted patients or mild and moderate
COVID-19 patients among 17 patients with
lung sequalaes in our study, 8 had not expe-
rienced a complicated course of COVID-19.
Even patients having baseline lung involve-
ment of lower 40% were also at risk of expe-
riencing lung sequalaes .
This might bring a clinical challenge in pre-
dicting and preventing lung sequalaes in
COVID-19 patients.
Available tools being used for long-term re-
spiratory follow-up of COVID-19 patients
are pulmonary function tests, chest CT scans,
and biomarkers [11]; but none are evaluated
as monitoring tools. To this aim, after validat-
Baseline to 6th week 6th week to 12th week total
0
5
10
15
20
25
Changes in SPO2 %
Sequeled
Improved
ns
Baseline to 6th week 6th week to 12th week total
-150
-100
-50
0
50
Changes in CRP levels
Sequeled
Improved
ns
ns
ns
Figure 2. changes in SPO2% and CRP levels in di󰀨erent timelines of (i) baseline to 6th week; (ii) 6th to 12th
week; (iii) total, baseline to 12th week; ns: not signicant; *: statistical di󰀨erence.
6GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
Abiri S, et al. Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels
As COVID-19 pandemic is getting less in-
tense with the help of broad vaccinations
worldwide, cases have tended to manifest
with less severity and less need for hospital-
ization [19, 20], management and follow-up
of outpatient COVID-19 have earned more
respect in 2022, and health systems are trying
to get changed to pre-COVID-19 era [21] for
utilization of the medical resources as well as
the application of the HRCTs for non-COVID
patients.
So having available, low-cost, and accurate
tools for monitoring COVID-19 outpatients
to prevent lung damage is important and we
propose following the O2 saturation before
conducting early CT scans.
Strengths and Limitations of study
This study, having a good sample size, was
restricted to some methodological and re-
source shortage issues. We were just able to
radiologically follow the respiratory function
of the participants and no pulmonary func-
tion tests were available. Our data might have
been aected by the eect of the independent
radiologists reviewing the HRCT results. Ra-
diologists were not blinded to the primary CT
scan record of the patients which might be a
source of bias.
Conclusion
The prevalence of lung sequalaes in patients
who were not admitted to the intensive care
unit is one of the study’s most signicant
ndings.
Even patients whose baseline lung
involvement is less than 40% are susceptible
to lung sequalaes.The clinical problem of
anticipating and preventing lung sequalaes
in COVID-19 patients may result from this.
We discovered that it is possible to anticipate
lung sequalaes using SPO2 uctuations that
are statistically distinct among participants
with varying degrees of lung involvement.
In almost all patients in our study, CRP levels
fell statistically signicantly throughout the
course of the 12 weeks; however, there was
no statistically signicant dierence in CRP
levels between individuals with long-term
respiratory sequalaes and the other patients.
ing adjusted time-varying potential predictors
of lung squeal, we evaluated the amount of
change in predictors to forecast the incidence
of parenchymal lung injury.
The clinical characteristics of patients evalu-
ated in this study are similar to previous re-
ports of COVID-19 patients in Jahrom city
[12] and our most evaluated patients were se-
lected within the infected population of city
during the 5th wave of disease in the city [13].
In this way, we found that SPO2 changes that
are statistically dierent among the subjects
with dierent severity of lung involvement
can be utilized to predict lung sequalaes.
SPO2 is also being used as a non-invasive
prognostic marker for critically ill patients of
COVID-19 [14].
In our study, it was revealed that the amount
of improvement of the SPO2 at 6 weeks after
discharge can be lower in participants with
lung sequels.
Other reports have also suggested that oxygen
saturation level can be utilized for follow-up
of both severe and mild/moderate COVID-19
cases along with a walk meter test [15]; while
as we had not any baseline physical evalu-
ation of the walk meter, we did not include
these factors.
We also found that age, need for ICU ad-
mission, and symptoms of dyspnea at arrival
could aect the SPO2 trend of change during
the time. But, the overall decrease of satu-
ration of oxygen after 6 weeks of discharge
compared with the baseline admission oxygen
saturation is an indication for further investi-
gations, based on our results.
Our study showed a statistically signicant
decrease in CRP levels during the 12 weeks
in almost all patients; while CRP levels were
not statistically dierent between the patients
with a long-term respiratory squeal and oth-
ers, research suggests that its raise is associ-
ated with the severity of COVID-19 during
the hospitalization [16] and in contrast to our
study, some report persistent high CRP levels
after 6 weeks of discharge [17].
Another study suggests that physicians should
not be awaiting early normalization of labora-
tory and clinical ndings of COVID-19 soon
after discharge [18], but no denitive change
range is proposed for none of the factors in
literature.
GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
7
Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels Abiri S, et al.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the Clinical Research
Development Unit of Peymaniyeh Educational
and Research and Therapeutic Center of
Jahrom University of Medical Sciences for
providing facilities for this work.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts
of interest.
References
1. Afsahi A, Lombardi A, Valizadeh S, Ghol-
amrezanezhad A, Behera B, Azhar A, et al.
WJCID. World. 2021;11(1):1-34.
2. Park WB, Jun KI, Kim G, Choi J-P, Rhee J-Y,
Cheon S, et al. Correlation between pneumo-
nia severity and pulmonary complications in
Middle East respiratory syndrome. J Korea
Med Sci. 2018;33(24):1-5.
3. Cao J, Zheng X, Wei W, Chu X, Chen X,
Wang Y, et al. Three-month outcomes of
recovered COVID-19 patients: prospective
observational study. Therap Advn Resp Dis.
2021;15:17534666211009410.
4. Zou J-N, Sun L, Wang B-R, Zou Y, Xu S,
Ding Y-J, et al. The characteristics and evolu-
tion of pulmonary brosis in COVID-19 pa-
tients as assessed by AI-assisted chest HRCT.
PloS one. 2021;16(3):e0248957.
5. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren
L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of
COVID-19 in patients discharged from
hospital: a cohort study. The Lancet.
2021;397(10270):220-32.
6. Huntley CC, Patel K, Mobeen F, Armitage
MN, Pye A, Knight CB, et al. Pulmonary
function test and computed tomography
features during follow-up after SARS, MERS
and COVID-19: a systematic review and me-
ta-analysis. ERJ Opn Res. 2022;8(2):00056-
2022.
7. Salem AM, Al Khathlan N, Alharbi AF, Al-
ghamdi T, AlDuilej S, Alghamdi M, et al. The
long-term impact of COVID-19 pneumonia
on the pulmonary function of survivors. Int J
Genr Med. 2021;14:3271.
8. Musat C, Hadzhiivanov M, Durkowski V,
Banerjee A, Chiphang A, Diwan M, et al. Ob-
servational study of clinico-radiological fol-
low-up of COVID-19 pneumonia: a district
general hospital experience in the UK. BMC
Infc Dis. 2021;21(1):1-8.
9. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics
(The 7th edition). Boston, MA: Brooks/Cole;
2011.
10. Pan F, Ye T, Sun P, Gui S, Liang B, Li L, et
al. Time course of lung changes at chest CT
during recovery from coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19). Radiol. 2020;295(3):715-
21.
11. Shah AS, Wong AW, Hague CJ, Murphy DT,
Johnston JC, Ryerson CJ, et al. A prospective
study of 12-week respiratory outcomes in
COVID-19-related hospitalisations. Thorax.
2021;76(4):402-4.
12. Sahraeai R, Sarikhani Y, Kalani N, Hatami
N, Abiri AA, Eftekharian F. Prevalence of
Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Patients with
COVID-19 in Jahrom County, Fras Prov-
ince, Southwest of Iran. J Med Chem Sci.
2022;5(4):483-90.
13. Sanie Jahromi MS, Aghaei K, Taheri L,
Kalani N, Hatami N, Rahmanian Z. Intensive
Care Unit of COVID-19 during the Dierent
Waves of Outbreaks in Jahrom, South of Iran.
J Med Chem Sci. 2022;5(5):734-42.
14. Lu X, Jiang L, Chen T, Wang Y, Zhang B,
Hong Y, et al. Continuously available ratio of
SpO 2/FiO 2 serves as a noninvasive prog-
nostic marker for intensive care patients with
COVID-19. Resp Res. 2020;21(1):1-4.
15. George PM, Barratt SL, Condlie R, Desai
SR, Devaraj A, Forrest I, et al. Respiratory
follow-up of patients with COVID-19 pneu-
monia. Thorax. 2020;75(11):1009-16.
16. Mueller AA, Tamura T, Crowley CP, DeGra-
do JR, Haider H, Jezmir JL, et al. Inam-
matory biomarker trends predict respiratory
decline in COVID-19 patients. Cel Rep Med.
2020;1(8):100144.
17. Mandal S, Barnett J, Brill SE, Brown JS,
Denneny EK, Hare SS, et al. ‘Long-COVID’:
a cross-sectional study of persisting symp-
toms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities
following hospitalisation for COVID-19.
Thorax. 2021;76(4):396-8.
18. Saab FG, Chiang JN, Brook R, Adamson
PC, Fulcher JA, Halperin E, et al. Discharge
clinical characteristics and post-discharge
events in patients with severe COVID-19:
a descriptive case series. J Genr Inter Med.
8GMJ.2023;12:e2695
www.gmj.ir
Abiri S, et al. Oxygen Saturation and CRP and COVID-19 Lung Sequels
2021;36(4):1017-22.
19. Abdullah F, Myers J, Basu D, Tintinger G,
Ueckermann V, Mathebula M, et al. De-
creased severity of disease during the rst
global omicron variant covid-19 outbreak in
a large hospital in tshwane, south africa. Int J
Inf Dis. 2022;116:38-42.
20. Christensen PA, Olsen RJ, Long SW, Snehal
R, Davis JJ, Saavedra MO, et al. Signals of
signicantly increased vaccine breakthrough,
decreased hospitalization rates, and less
severe disease in patients with Coronavirus
disease 2019 caused by the Omicron variant
of severe acute respiratory syndrome Coro-
navirus 2 in Houston, Texas. The Amerc J
Patol. 2022;192(4):642-52.
21. Mogharab V, Ostovar M, Ruszkowski J,
Hussain SZM, Shrestha R, Yaqoob U, et
al. Global burden of the COVID-19 asso-
ciated patient-related delay in emergency
healthcare: a panel of systematic review and
meta-analyses. Glob Helt. 2022;18(1):1-18.