Arezaei H, et al. The Place of Medical Ethics in the Canon of Medicine
2GMJ.2023;12:e2794
www.gmj.ir
The Medical Ethics in the Canon of Medicine
The Canon of Medicine consists of ve vol-
umes. Its rst volume is called al-Kullīyyāt,
which contains principles of medicine, in-
cluding general anatomy, physiology, etiol-
ogy and health, and symptomology [2, 5].
Although Ibn Sīnā (also known as Avicenna)
presented a chapter called “waṣīyyah” at the
end of the rst volume, he did not dedicate
any specic chapter to the medical ethics. The
word “waṣīyyah” can mean both moral advice
and professional teachings. According to the
content of this part in the Canon of Medicine,
Ibn Sīnā used the word in the second mean-
ing [2]. Therefore, Quṭb al-Dīn used this op-
portunity and explained his personal opinions
along with the viewpoints of his predecessors
on the ethical issues under this title as a com-
mentator.
About the Fī Bayān al-Ḥājah ila al-Ṭibb wa
al-Aṭibbā wa Waṣāyāhum
In the dierent parts of the al-Tuḥfa al-
Saʿdīya, the medical ethics issues are dis-
cussed in the form of various topics, such as
professional recommendations, talking about
death, teaching methods of medical knowl-
edge, etc. [6-8]. Contrary to the opinion of the
authors [1], Quṭb al-Dīn did not have a dis-
tinct book or treatise in the eld of medical
ethics. The bibliographic evaluation of the
manuscripts indicates that in order to provide
a separate book on the medical ethics, some
scholars interested in ethical issues who lived
after Quṭb al-Dīn tried to collect these pages
related to medical ethics. They have selected
and transcribed relevant parts of the al-Tuḥfa
al-Saʿdīya just to teach their students in the
form of a single book named Fī Bayān al-Ḥā-
jah ila al-Ṭibb wa al-Aṭibbā wa Waṣāyāhum.
Therefore, these contents were not compiled
by Quṭb al-Dīn himself in the form of a spe-
cic book on medical ethics. This can be seen
in the few remaining manuscripts of the med-
ical ethics based on the al-Tuḥfa al-Saʿdīya,
edited by al-Dhākirī and al-Mizyadī [9,10].
Reviewing and comparing the expressions
used in dierent parts of these manuscripts
with the original versions of the al-Tuḥfa al-
Saʿdīya, clearly proves that the main content
is related to the al-Tuḥfa al-Saʿdīya by Quṭb
al-Dīn [6-10].
Although Muslim scholars were concerned
with medical ethics, its separation from the
discipline of medicine as a distinct branch of
science happened later. Ibn Sīnā considered
the medical ethics to be outside the scope of
medicine, therefore, even though he authored
some contents on ethics, he did not dedicate
any specic chapter to medical ethics in the
Canon of Medicine. In the commentary of the
rst volume of the Canon, Quṭb al-Dīn devot-
ed scattered parts of the al-Tuḥfa al-Saʿdīya to
the topics of medical ethics. In order to high-
light medical ethics as a specic eld and to
make the medical community of their time pay
attention to ethical issues, the scholars who
lived after Quṭb al-Dīn created works from the
scattered writings of the predecessors’ books
to ll the void of independent books in the
eld of medical ethics.
[GMJ.2023;12:e2794]DOI:10.31661/gmj.
v12i0.2794
Conict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conict
of interest.
Keywords: Medical Ethics; History of Medi-
cine; Avicenna; Quṭb al-Din
References
1. Azmand S, Heydari M. Medical ethics
according to Avicenna's stance: A synopsis.
Galen Med J. 2017;6(4): 261-267.
2. Ibn Sīnā AAH (Avicenna). Al-Qānūn fī al-
Tibb (Canon of Medicine). Beirut: Dar Ihya
al-Turath al-Arabi; 2005.
3. Arezaei H, Zargaran A. Autobiography of
Quṭb al-Din Shīrāzī (a Persian physician
in 14th century AD) in his manuscript,
al-Tuḥfa al-Saʿdīya. Acta Med Hist Adriat.
2021;19(1):113–124.
4. Nadim M, Farjam M. Quṭb al-Dīn Shīrāzī
(1236-1311), Persian polymath physi-
cian in the medieval period. J Med Biogr.
2016;24(3):360–362.
5. Mimura T. Quṭb al-Dīn Shīrāzī’s medical
work, al-Tuḥfa al-Saʿdīya (Commentary on
volume 1 of Ibn Sīnā’s al-Qānūn fī al- Ṭibb)