Received 2025-01-16

Revised 2025-04-20

Accepted 2025-06-30

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran Until 2032

Golsa Danesh 1, Somayeh Hessam 1, Shaghayegh Vahdat 1, Soad Mahfoozpour 1

1 Department of Health Service Administration, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background: The changes in the role of hospitals in the future require planning for the changes in the structure of hospitals. This study aimed to explore the state of public hospitals in Iran by 2032. Materials and Methods: The participants were 20 hospital management and healthcare experts selected using purposive sampling. Structural interaction analysis and MICMAC software were used for data processing. Results: The findings indicated the growing budgetary constraints in the health sector due to the increasing economic and health burden of non-communicable diseases and emerging diseases caused by environmental changes, the structure of the purchase of drugs, consumables, and medical equipment, the share of the health sector in the national public budget, providing access to capital/loans for the development of hospital activities by the government, the cost-effectiveness ratio of each service, the overcharged tariff set for hospital services, and public health insurance and a shift from employer-based insurance coverage to government-oriented insurance coverage are the key drivers affecting the state of public hospitals in Iran. Conclusion: The identified factors play a vital role in the state of public hospitals in Iran. This can be useful for policymakers and hospital managers to recognize the future developments of hospitals and healthcare centers.

[GMJ.2025;14:e3786] DOI:3786

Keywords: Public Hospitals; Futuristic Studies; Hospital Management

Introduction

The changes in the role of hospitals in the future require long-term and medium-term planning for the necessary changes in the structure of hospitals [1]. Examining and choosing different approaches to make changes in hospitals require extensive investigations in this field and finding the best answer for the conditions and characteristics of a country [2]. Hospital management is a complex and multifaceted process that involves planning, organizing, directing, and controlling resources and activities related to providing healthcare services [3]. The main goal of hospital management is to ensure the provision of high-quality services to patients, improve treatment outcomes [4], and increase organizational efficiency and productivity [5]. This task requires the management of human [6], financial, equipment, and information resources in such a way that all divisions of the hospital, including clinical and administrative departments, work harmoniously and effectively [7]. Hospital managers must have good leadership, decision-making, and problem-solving skills to cope effectively with the numerous and varied challenges of this complex environment [8]. In addition, hospital managers must continuously adapt to rapid changes in medical technology, health laws and regulations, and community needs by carrying out innovations, improving quality and patient safety, managing costs, and creating a positive and sustainable organizational culture. Based on patient and staff feedback and analysis of performance data and indicators [9], hospital managers should be able to make effective strategic and operational decisions [10].

Evaluation of hospitals helps policymakers, doctors, and managers control the performance and accuracy and effectiveness of the payment system [11]. It also creates transparency in the affairs and greater responsibility of people in the organization. It will lead to better performance of the organization, especially in the more important sectors from the perspective of stakeholders and the community [12]. These evaluations play a significant role in achieving both internal and external goals of the organization [13].

Furthermore, evaluations give managers a clear perspective on the efficiency and effectiveness of hospitals and can be useful in clarifying the efficiency and success of the organization as well as the utilization of resources [14]. In general, the discovery and evaluation of organizations, in addition to leading to the promotion and accountability of the organization and public trust in the performance of organizations and efficiency and effectiveness, can significantly contribute to planning and developing goals, to prepare the organization to face complex environmental changes [15].

To this end, using a futures research approach, the present study seeks to predict the most likely indicators related to the state of public hospitals in Iran for the next 10 years and provide some implications for healthcare planners. This study employs a structural analysis approach that addresses the state of the system, the way the drivers affect and are affected, and finally the recognition of the key drivers. Thus, the following questions are addressed in this study:

1. What factors will affect the future of public hospitals in Iran by 2032?

2. Are the factors affecting the state of public hospitals in Iran by 2032 stable or unstable?

3. How will the identified factors affect the state of public hospitals in Iran by 2032?

4. What are the key drivers affecting the state of public hospitals in Iran by 2032?

Materials and Methods

This applied and exploratory study adopted a future research approach. It also used a documentary approach and the Delphi method to identify the most important drivers of the future of public hospitals in Iran.

The Delphi method was chosen due to its effectiveness in gathering expert consensus on future-oriented issues, especially when empirical data is limited or unavailable. This method is widely used in healthcare futures studies to identify and prioritize key drivers.

The members of the Delphi team were selected through (judgmental) purposive sampling based on the selection criteria including theoretical knowledge, practical experience, willingness and ability to participate in the study, and accessibility. The number of experts participating in Delphi rounds is usually less than 50 people and generally 15 to 20 people. Accordingly, 20 academic and research experts were selected as the participants in this study in 2023 (Table-1).

The Delphi process consisted of two rounds. In round one, experts received a summary of literature findings and a structured list of 39 potential drivers. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement on the relevance and impact of each factor. No items were dropped during the process. MICMAC software was then used to analyze the influence relationships among the final set of factors. Data analysis revealed 39 primary drivers divided into 9 categories (economic, efficiency, political, health super trends, effectiveness, legal, technological, financial, and sociocultural factors) as shown in Table-2.

Ethical Approval

This article reported the results of a Ph.D. dissertation approved in 2024. The protocol for this study was approved by the ethics committee code IR.IAU.CTB.REC.1402.009 in the Islamic Azad University of South Tehran Branch. This study was conducted with full compliance with all ethical considerations, including maintaining the confidentiality of the identity information of the participants and obtaining their informed consent.

Results

The structural interaction analysis revealed 39 factors underlying the state of public hospitals in Iran by 2032 that were categorized in the form of a 39×39 matrix with 2 iterations and an 89 percent filling degree. The findings also indicated that the extracted variables have some effect on each other and the system is relatively stable. Of a total of 1355 relationships evaluated in the matrix, 166 relationships were zero, indicating that these factors did not affect each other or were not affected by each other. Moreover, 898 relationships with a value of 1 have a weak impact on each other, and 400 relationships with a value of 2 have a relatively strong impact. Besides, 57 relationships have a value of 3, suggesting that the key variables have a great influence on each other. The matrix developed in this study with 2 rotations based on the extracted factors has 100 percent desirability and optimization, which confirmed the acceptable validity of the data collection instruments. Table-3 displays the drivers affecting the state of public hospitals in Iran based on their direct impact. It should be noted that the impact of the drivers that obtained the highest scores may change.

The Interaction Effects of the Variables

The scatter plot for the distribution of the variables shows the degree of stability or instability of the system. The analysis of the mutual/structural effects of the variables with MICMAC software revealed two types of distribution: stable systems and unstable systems. In the stable system, the variables have an L-shaped distribution. In this system, some variables are affected significantly and some have a great influence. However, unstable systems are more complicated. The variables in this system are scattered around the diagonal axis of the plane, and thus the variables may affect and be affected by each other to a certain degree, which makes it difficult to identify the key variables. A look at the scatter plot of drivers affecting the future of the hospitals shows an unstable system. Most of the variables are scattered around the diagonal axis of the plane. Except for a few variables that have a high impact on the system, the rest of the variables are almost similar to each other in terms of their implications.

Figure-1 shows the distribution pattern of the state of public hospitals in Iran. This scree plot shows an unstable system:

Classification of Factors Affecting the Perspective of Hospitals

Underlying or influential factors: These factors are more influential but less affected by other factors. Thus, the system depends greatly on these variables. These factors are displayed in the northwest part (second quadrant) of the scree plot. The influential factors are the most critical components because system changes depend on them and the degree of control over these factors is very important. These factors are also considered system input variables. Of the 39 factors addressed in this study, some factors were classified as the drivers influencing the research model including economic sanctions, the increased inflation rate, exchange rate change, population aging, the pressure on the health system, and the speed of technological changes. Two-faceted factors: These factors affect other factors and are affected by other factors at the same time. These factors are placed in the northeast part (first quarter) of the scree plot. These factors are associated with instability because every action and change on them results in a reaction and change in other factors. The factors in the first quarter include the structure of tariffs, the structure of the financing system, the structure of the payment system, the provision of the necessary financial resources (from the public budget, donors, etc.) for the production of equipment and services for hospitals, the increased inflation rate in the health sector, the bed occupancy rate, the ratio of personnel payroll costs to total revenue, and operating income. Two-faceted factors are classified into two categories: risk factors and target factors:

Risk factors: These factors are located above the diagonal line of the northeastern part and have a great capacity to become key players in the system. The structure of tariffs and the structure of the financing system are among the risk factors identified in this study.

Target factors: These factors are placed under the northeast diagonal area of the scree plot (under the diagonal area of the first quadrant). The target factors are the evolutionary outcomes of the system and represent possible goals in a system. The system can be developed by manipulating and making changes in these factors. The target factors identified in this study include the components of the structure of the payment system, the provision of necessary financial resources (from the public budget of the government, donors, etc.) for the production of goods and services of hospitals, the increased inflation rate in the health sector, the bed occupancy rate, the ratio of personnel payroll costs to total revenue, and operating income.

Affected factors or outcome drivers: These factors are located in the southeast part of the scree plot and the fourth quadrant. They have less impact but are affected significantly. Hence, they are very sensitive to the development of influential and two-faceted drivers, and thus they are considered output factors. The output factors identified in this study are growing budget constraints in the health sector caused by the increasing economic and health burden of non-communicable diseases and emerging diseases caused by environmental changes, the structure of purchasing drugs, consumables, and medical equipment, the share of the health sector from the national public budget, providing access to capital/loans for the development of hospital activities by the government, the cost-effectiveness ratio of each service, high tariffs set for hospital goods, equipment, and services, universal health insurance and a shift from employer-based insurance coverage to government-oriented (tax-based)insurance coverage, comprehensiveness of treatment, the amount of the information provided the patient about the treatment procedures and outcomes, the ineffective budgeting system of hospitals, the advancements of health information technology, the ratio of the cost of medicines and medical supplies to the total costs, the ratio of the total costs to the active beds, the costs incurred per patient day, the ratio of the drug cost and medical consumables to total private income, ratio of total cost to total income, ratio of total labilities to total assets, and the increased community expectation of the healthcare system. Independent or exceptional factors: These factors have less influence and are less affected by other factors. They are located in the southwestern part of the scree plot and seem to have no connection with the system at all as they neither stop the main factors nor cause their development in the system. The independent factors extracted in this study included changes in bank interest rates, suitability of treatment to patient needs, waiting time in the emergency room, the level of executive managers' attention to satisfaction surveys, waiting time for patient admission, the obligations of hospitals to comply with scientific and local guidelines agreed by the Ministry of Health and insurance organizations, population growth changes, and disease burden pattern changes towards chronic diseases. However, independent factors also fall under two categories of drivers:

Discrete factors: These factors are located near the coordinate origin in the scree plot. The development of these variables has nothing to do with the dynamics of the current system and they can be removed from the system. No discrete factor was identified in this study.

Secondary leverages factors: Despite being completely independent, these drivers influence others rather than being influenced by other factors. They are located in the southwest of the scree plot and above the diagonal line and can be used as measuring points and benchmarks. The secondary leverages identified in this study are bank interest rate change, suitability of treatment to the patient's needs, the obligations of hospitals to comply with scientific and local guidelines agreed by the Ministry of Health and insurance organizations, changes in population growth, and changing the disease burden pattern towards chronic diseases.

Regulating factors: These factors are located near the center of gravity of the scree plot. They can act successively as “secondary leverages”, “weak targets” and “secondary risk drivers”. No regulatory factors were identified in this study.

Figure-2 shows a graphic display of drivers affecting the future of the hospital. The figure shows the direct and indirect influences of the drivers on other drivers of the system.

Four key drivers were selected from the 39 drivers examined in this study. These drivers are the most effective key drivers affecting the future state of public hospitals in Iran as shown in Table-4.

Discussion

Using a futurstic studies framework and the MICMAC approach, this study investigated the perspective of public hospitals in Iran by 2032. MICMAC analysis revealed four categories of factors with economic sanctions and the increased inflation rate being identified as the most influential. Economic sanctions can directly affect imports of medical equipment, drugs, and health technologies. Currency restrictions and reduced access to international resources expose hospitals to serious challenges in providing modern and up-to-date equipment [16]. International sanctions may also increase the cost of importing raw materials and medical products, which in turn can lead to a decrease in the quality of healthcare services and increased costs for patients. In addition, sanctions can reduce the incentive for foreign investment in the Iranian health sector and hence delay the development and improvement of hospital infrastructure [17].

In contrast with other studies, particularly those from Europe and the United States, which emphasize sustainability and technological transformation such as the use of artificial intelligence in hospitals, our study prioritized economic and structural drivers. This reflects the context-specific challenges of Iranian public hospitals but highlights the need for further research on environmental and technological dimensions of futurology.

Artificial intelligence has great potential to improve medical decision-making in the future, but the successful implementation of such systems in medicine requires other things in addition to paying attention to the principles required for any other information system, including organizational, behavioral, cultural, managerial, economic, educational, and technical factors[18].

High inflation rates can dramatically increase hospital operating costs. Rising prices for medicines, medical equipment, and human resources costs make managing the budget and resources of hospitals a big challenge. High inflation rates can also reduce people's purchasing power, consequently affecting the demand for healthcare services and reducing access to health services for vulnerable groups in the community [19].

Moreover, inflation can negatively affect the motivation and satisfaction of hospital staff, because the increased cost of living makes the level of salaries and wages insufficient, which in turn can cause a decrease in the quality of healthcare services provided [20].

Generally, the economic sanctions and growing inflation rates can both simultaneously and mutually affect each other and create many challenges for the management of Iranian hospitals in the future. Managing these challenges requires careful planning, effective policy-making, and efforts to improve efficiency and productivity in the use of limited available resources.

Exchange rate changes can have major effects on the costs and resource management of hospitals. A rise in exchange rates usually raises the cost of importing medical equipment, drugs, and consumables, which can increase hospital operating costs. Exchange rate changes can also lead to a decrease in the ability of hospitals to provide advanced and necessary equipment, a decrease in the quality of healthcare services, and an increase in treatment costs for patients [21].

Furthermore, exchange rate fluctuations can make the financial planning of hospitals more difficult, and thus hospitals require more complex financial and risk management strategies. Population aging is also one of the biggest challenges for Iran's health system in the future [22].

Older adults are more likely to suffer from chronic diseases and long-term care needs, which creates a financial burden and additional pressure on hospitals and the health system. Hospitals need to adapt to these demographic changes through the development of specialized departments such as long-term care, rehabilitation, and social support services. Moreover, there is a growing need for education and training of medical staff specializing in the care of older adults [23].

The speed of technological changes in the field of healthcare has increased dramatically, and hospitals must be able to keep up with these developments. New technologies such as telemedicine, artificial intelligence, data mining, and robotics can help improve service quality, increase efficiency, and reduce costs [24].

However, the adoption and implementation of these technologies require significant investment. Besides, the training of the medical staff is necessary for the effective use of new technologies. Hospitals should also take serious measures in the field of information security and privacy of patients, because new technologies may create privacy and security risks [25].

Conclusion

The factors identified in this study play a vital role in the state of public hospitals in Iran in different sectors. These findings can be useful for policymakers and hospital managers to recognize the future developments of hospitals and healthcare centers and not be surprised when facing the future.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to all the participants in this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

GMJ

Copyright© 2025, Galen Medical Journal.

This is an open-access article distributed

under the terms of the Creative Commons

Attribution 4.0 International License

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Email:gmj@salviapub.com

Correspondence to:

Somayeh Hessam, Department of Health Service Administration, ST.C., Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Telephone Number: +989122268534

Email Address: Shessam@iau.ac.ir

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.salviapub.com

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

2

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

Table 1. The Participants’ Demographic

Characteristics

Variables

Categories

Frequency

Percentage

Education

Master’s degree

8

40

Ph.D.

12

60

Job experience

<10 years

7

35

11-20 year

8

40

>20 years

5

25

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

Danesh G, et al.

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

3

Table 2. Factors Affecting the State of Public Hospitals in Iran

Main factors

Categories

Economic

Tariff structure

C1

The structure of the financing system

C2

The structure of the payment system (strategic service purchase by insurance organizations based on quality and price, and public payment for the price of healthcare services)

C3

The growing budget constraints in the health sector caused by the increasing economic and health burden of non-communicable diseases and emerging diseases caused by environmental changes

C4

Providing necessary financial resources (from the public budget, donors, etc.) for the production of hospital goods and services

C5

The structure of purchasing medicines, consumables, and medical equipment

C6

Economic sanctions

C7

The growing inflation rate in the health sector

C8

The growing inflation rate

C9

Exchange rate change

C10

The share of the health sector from the national public budget

C11

Bank interest rate change

C12

Providing access to capital/loans for the development of hospital activities by the government

C13

Efficiency

Cost-effectiveness ratio of each service

C14

Bed occupancy ratio

C15

Political

The inappropriateness of the set tariff for hospital goods, equipment, and services

C16

Health super trends

Universal health insurance and a shift from employer-based insurance coverage to government-oriented (tax-based) insurance coverage

C17

Population aging and the elasticity on the health system

C18

Effectiveness

Suitability of treatment to the patient’s needs

C19

Waiting time in the emergency room (for triage or patient assignment for admission, discharge, or operating room)

C20

Comprehensiveness of treatment (attention to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation)

C21

The amount of information provided to the patient about treatment techniques and outcomes

C22

The level of executive managers’ attention to satisfaction surveys

C23

Waiting time for patient admission (inpatient ward or operating room)

C24

Legal

Ineffective hospital budgeting system (public budget, linear budget, and ownership of the budget resulting from savings)

C25

The obligations of hospitals to comply with scientific and local guidelines agreed by the Ministry of Health and insurance organizations

C26

Technological

Advancement of health information technology (home care, telemedicine, distance education, electronic health records, and electronic prescribing)

C27

The speed of technology changes

C28

Financial

The ratio of personnel payroll costs to total revenue

C29

The ratio of the cost of medicine and medical consumables to the total costs

C30

The ratio of total cost to active beds

C31

Costs incurred per patient day

C32

The ratio of the cost of medicine and medical consumables to the total private income

C33

The ratio of total costs to total revenues

C34

The ratio of total debts to total assets

C35

Operating income

C36

Sociocultural

Increased public expectations of the healthcare system

C37

Changes in population growth

C38

Changing the disease burden pattern toward chronic diseases

C39

Continue is in the next page.

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

4

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

Continue of Table 2. Factors Affecting the State of Public Hospitals in Iran

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

Danesh G, et al.

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

5

Figure 1. The scree plot for the factors affecting the state of hospitals

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

6

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

Table 3. The Degree of the Direct Effects of the Factors on Each Other

Row

Factors Affecting Hospital Performance

Total row score (level of influencing)

Total column score (level of influence)

1

Tariff structure

62

49

2

The financing system

66

50

3

The structure of the financing system

55

61

4

The structure of the payment system (strategic service purchase by insurance organizations based on quality and price, and public payment for the price of healthcare services)

46

51

5

The growing budget constraints in the health sector caused by the increasing economic and health burden of non-communicable diseases and emerging diseases caused by environmental changes

59

53

6

Providing necessary financial resources (from the public budget, donors, etc.) for the production of hospital goods and services

45

50

7

The structure of purchasing medicines, consumables, and medical equipment

67

21

8

Economic sanctions

58

51

9

The growing inflation rate in the health sector

71

38

10

The growing inflation rate

60

20

11

Exchange rate change

51

63

12

The share of the health sector from the national public budget

42

26

13

Bank interest rate change

49

59

14

Providing access to capital/loans for the development of hospital activities by the government

41

56

15

Cost-effectiveness ratio of each service

54

54

16

Bed occupancy ratio

50

49

17

The high tariff set for hospital goods, equipment, and services

38

49

18

Universal health insurance and a shift from employer-based insurance coverage to government-oriented (tax-based) insurance coverage

56

39

19

Population aging and the pressure on the health system

49

40

20

Suitability of treatment to the patient’s needs

35

40

21

Waiting time in the emergency room (for triage or patient assignment for admission, discharge, or operating room)

40

51

22

Comprehensiveness of treatment (attention to prevention, treatment, and rehabilitation)

32

46

23

The amount of information provided to the patient about treatment techniques and outcomes

32

38

24

The level of executive managers’ attention to satisfaction surveys

34

45

25

Waiting time for patient admission (inpatient department or operating room)

38

53

26

Ineffective hospital budgeting system (public budget, linear budget, and ownership of the budget resulting from savings)

48

42

27

The obligations of hospitals to comply with scientific and local guidelines agreed by the Ministry of Health and insurance organizations

45

51

28

Advancement of health information technology (home care, telemedicine, distance education, electronic health records, and electronic prescribing)

56

45

29

The speed of technology changes

54

53

30

The ratio of personnel payroll costs to total revenue

42

51

31

The ratio of the cost of medicine and medical consumables to the total costs

41

49

32

The ratio of total cost to active beds

41

60

33

Costs incurred per patient day

42

50

34

The ratio of the cost of medicine and medical consumables to the total private income

42

57

35

The ratio of total costs to total revenues

42

53

36

The ratio of total debts to total assets

57

72

37

Operating income

37

67

38

Increased public expectations of the healthcare system

43

30

39

Changes in population growth

49

30

Total

Changing the disease burden pattern toward chronic diseases

1869

1869

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

Danesh G, et al.

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

7

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

8

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

Table 4. Variables Affecting the Future State of Public Hospitals in Iran

Factors indirectly influenced

Symbol

Factors influencing indirectly

Symbol

Factors directly influenced

Symbol

Factors influencing directly

Symbol

Rank

376

C36

392

C9

385

C36

379

C9

1

354

C37

370

C7

358

C37

358

C7

2

336

C11

355

C2

337

C11

353

C2

3

318

C3

340

C1

326

C3

331

C1

4

316

C32

337

C10

321

C32

321

C10

5

303

C34

318

C5

304

C34

315

C5

6

302

C14

313

C8

299

C13

310

C8

7

299

C13

302

C36

299

C14

304

C36

8

288

C29

294

C3

288

C15

299

C18

9

287

C15

294

C29

283

C5

299

C28

10

287

C5

293

C28

283

C25

294

C3

11

281

C35

287

C18

283

C29

288

C15

12

279

C25

279

C15

283

C35

288

C29

13

276

C21

277

C11

272

C4

272

C11

14

273

C27

268

C16

272

C8

267

C16

15

269

C4

256

C19

272

C21

262

C13

16

269

C30

256

C39

272

C27

262

C19

17

268

C8

255

C13

272

C30

262

C39

18

267

C6

251

C26

267

C2

256

C26

19

266

C2

248

C4

267

C6

246

C4

20

265

C16

241

C6

267

C33

240

C6

21

263

C31

240

C27

262

C1

240

C27

22

263

C17

233

C12

262

C16

230

C38

23

261

C33

228

C38

262

C17

224

C12

24

257

C1

222

C34

262

C31

224

C30

25

254

C22

222

C35

246

C22

224

C33

26

249

C24

221

C31

240

C24

224

C34

27

238

C28

221

C32

240

C28

224

C35

28

225

C26

220

C30

224

C26

219

C14

29

221

C19

220

C33

214

C19

219

C31

30

220

C20

219

C14

214

C20

219

C32

31

217

C38

210

C17

214

C38

214

C21

32

209

C18

207

C21

208

C18

203

C17

33

208

C23

203

C25

203

C9

203

C25

34

198

C9

197

C37

203

C23

197

C37

35

164

C39

180

C20

160

C39

187

C20

36

138

C12

174

C24

139

C12

181

C24

37

109

C7

169

C22

112

C7

171

C22

38

103

C10

167

C23

107

C10

171

C23

39

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

Danesh G, et al.

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

9

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

10

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

Figure 2. The direct (strongest) influences of the factors

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

Danesh G, et al.

, et al.

Running title

8

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir

11

  1. Khademi Jolgehnejad A, Ahmadi Kahnali R, Heyrani A. Futures studies of hospital resilience supply chain with the intuitive logics scenario planning. Hospital. 2020;19(3):9-19.
  2. Amin E, Ghasemi E, Haghdoost AA, Hashemian F, Sabermahani A. The Hospital Wards of the Future Framework. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2016;15(7):607-20.
  3. Heidari OP, VAHDAT S, Soltani H. Presentation of Health Financing System Model with Emphasis on Structural, Contextual, Instrumental and Content Factors. Journal of Healthcare Management Research. 2020;11(1):87-99.
  4. Mekuria GA, Ali EE. The financial burden of out of pocket payments on medicines among households in Ethiopia: analysis of trends and contributing factors. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):808.
  5. Sarwal R, Prasad U, Gopal KM, Kalal S, Kaur D, Kumar A et al. Investment opportunities in India's healthcare sector. NITI Aayog: Book; 2021.
  6. Eisavi M, Moayedfard A. Budget Trends and Financing Methods of the Health Sector in Iran: an Operational Proposal. Journal of Health Administration. 2022;24(4):71-83.
  7. Mustafa Ö. Socioeconomic Determinants of Out-Of-Pocket Health Care Expenditures in Turkey. Fiscaoeconomia. 2023; 7(2):1196-211.
  8. Jani K, Chaudhary B. Importance of Hospital Management. A Guide to Hospital Administration and Planning: Springer; 2023.
  9. Mackillop WJ, Hanna TP, Brundage MD. Health services research in radiation oncology: toward achieving the achievable for patients with cancer Clinical radiation oncology. Elsevier. 2016; 2: 217-38
  10. Jazieh AR, Kozlakidis Z. Healthcare transformation in the post-coronavirus pandemic era. Frontiers in Medicine. 2020;7:429.
  11. Agarwal V. The future of healthcare post covid. The: Economic Times; 2021.
  12. GWG B. Role of analytical tools in airline. flight safety management systems: Global Aviation Information Network; 2004.
  13. Beleya P, Veerappan G, Ding WJ, Tan J. Challenges in attaining sustainable development goals in port Klang: Port management perspective. International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2020;9(1):349-55.
  14. Pro DD, Con BM. Should key performance indicators for clinical services be mandatory? Canadian journal of Hospital Pharmacy. 2011;64(1): 989.
  15. Rodriguez M, Hilderink H. Scenario Development. Using: Foresight Studies; 2023.
  16. Rahmanian E, Nekoei M, Mardani M. Factors affecting futures Studies in hospitals: A Qualitative Study. Journal of Qualitative Research in Health Sciences. 2019;7(4):361-71.
  17. Pizzini MJ. The relation between cost-system design, managers’ evaluations of the relevance and usefulness of cost data, and financial performance: an empirical study of US hospitals. Accounting, organizations and society. 2006;31(2):179-210.
  18. Stone P, Brooks R, Brynjolfsson E, Calo R, Etzioni O, Hager G, et al. Artificial intelligence and life in 2030: the one hundred year study on artificial intelligence. arXiv preprint arXiv. 2022; :221106318.
  19. Pink GH, Daniel I, Hall L, McKILLOP I. Selection of key financial indicators: a literature, panel and survey approach. Healthcare quarterly (Toronto, Ont). 2007;10(1):87-96.
  20. Amiri MM, Tavana AM. Successful implementation of General Health Policies in the Islamic Republic of Iran: barriers and mechanisms. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal. 2018;24(12):1127-34.
  21. Janati A, Valizadeh S, Asghari-Jafarabadi M. Development of financial indicators of hospital performance. Journal of Clinical Research & Governance. 2014;3(2):92-8.
  22. Roudi F, Azadi P, Mesgaran M. Iran’s population dynamics and demographic. window of opportunity: Domestic Economy; 2017.
  23. Yazdani A, Fekrazad H, Sajadi H, Salehi M. Relationship between social participation and general health among the elderly. Journal of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. 2015;18(10): 2298.
  24. Rahimi H, Kavosi Z, Shojaei P, Kharazmi E. Key performance indicators in hospital based on balanced scorecard model. Health Management & Information Science. 2017;4(1):17-24.
  25. Retèl VP, Joore MA, Linn SC, Rutgers EJ, van Harten WH. Scenario drafting to anticipate future developments in technology assessment. BMC research notes. 2012;5:1-12.

References

Danesh G, et al.

Futurology of the Situation of Public Hospitals in Iran until 2032

12

GMJ.2025;14:e3786

www.gmj.ir