The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i.1663Keywords:
Adolescent; Validation; Neglect; Child AbuseAbstract
Background: The present study aimed to determine the psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q), a tool based on a retrospective interview with the child. Materials and Methods: To this aim, 251 adolescents from four regions of Tehran megacity completed the questionnaire. The reliability of the questionnaire was examined, along with the face and content validity. In addition, the construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: EFA and CFA supported a 4-factor solution including mother’s role scale items, father’s role scale items, maternal behavior scale items, and paternal behavior scale items. The total variance extracted in EFA ranged from 33.9 to 60.7. The internal consistency for mother’s role, father’s role, maternal behavior, and paternal behavior was 0.61, 0.65, 0.86, and 0.9 respectively. Thus, the questionnaire had a suitable fit, as well as reasonable reliability and validity. Conclusion: The Persian version of the CECA.Q had adequate reliability and validity as a self-report measurement for childhood experience of care and abuse. [GMJ.2020;9:e1663]
References
Parker G, Roussos J, HadziPavlovic D, Mitchell P, Wilhelm K, Austin MP. The development of a refined measure of dysfunctional parenting and assessment of its relevance in patients with affective disorders. Psychol Med. 1997;27(5):1193-203. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329179700545XPMid:9300523 Mackinnon A, Henderson A, Andrews G. Parental 'affectionless control'as an antecedent to adult depression: a risk factor refined. Psychol Med. 1993;23(1):135-41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291700038927PMid:8475201 Harris T, Brown GW, Bifulco A. Loss of parent in childhood and adult psychiatric disorder: A tentative overall model. Dev Psychopathol. 1990;2(3):311-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400000791 Cummings EM, Davies PT. Effects of marital conflict on children: Recent advances and emerging themes in process-oriented research. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2002;43(1):31-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00003PMid:11848336 Lee MA, Song RR. Childhood abuse, personality traits, and depressive symptoms in adulthood. Child Abuse Negl. 2017;65:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.009PMid:28189957 Comijs HC, van Exel E, van der Mast RC, Paauw A, Voshaar RO, Stek ML. Childhood abuse in late-life depression. J Affect Disord. 2013;147(1-3):241-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2012.11.010PMid:23196199 Brewin CR, Andrews B, Gotlib IH. Psychopathology and Early Experience - a Reappraisal of Retrospective Reports. Psychol Bull. 1993;113(1):82-98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.113.1.82PMid:8426875 Bifulco A, Brown GW, Lillie A, Jarvis J. Memories of childhood neglect and abuse: Corroboration in a series of sisters. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(3):365-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01520.xPMid:9232482 Bifulco A, Moran P. Wednesday's child: Research into women's experience of neglect and abuse in childhood and adult depression. Routledge; 2002. Bifulco A, Bernazzani O, Moran RM, Jacobs C. The childhood experience of care and abuse questionnaire (CECA.Q): Validation in a community series. Br J Clin Psychol. 2005;44(4):563-81. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466505X35344PMid:16368034 Smith N, Lam D, Bifulco A, Checkley S. Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q) - Validation of a screening instrument for childhood adversity in clinical populations. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002;37(12):572-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-002-0589-9PMid:12545234 Tinsley HE, Brown SD. Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling. Academic Press; 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50002-1 Bentler PM, Bonett DG. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 1980;88(3):588. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588