Determining Core Components in Accreditation of Limited Surgery Facilities in Iran

Authors

  • Nader Asgari 1. Department of Health Services Administration, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • Somayeh Hessam 1. Department of Health Services Administration, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
  • Irvan Masoudi Asl 2. Department of Health Services Management, School of Management and Information, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Shaghayegh Vahdat 1. Department of Health Services Administration, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i.1729

Keywords:

Day Care Centers; Accreditation; Comparative Study

Abstract

Background: Limited surgery facilities, or day-care centers, have been expanding in recent years with the approach of reducing the number of patients referred to hospitals for treatment in relation to limited and ambulatory surgeries. This study was conducted to perform a comparative review of accreditation models for limited surgery facilities of selected countries and to obtain expert opinions in the field of policymaking and accreditation in Iran. Materials and Methods: This applied and qualitative study was carried out by a comparative method in 2019. The accreditation standards of limited surgery facilities in nine selected countries/states were assessed. Semi-structured interviews were then held with 25 Iranian experts in policymaking as well as accreditation authorities. Results: Evaluation of the core components of accreditation standards for limited surgery facilities in selected countries showed that the main concepts of care and treatment, human resource management, patient safety, drug management, patient education, health information management, quality improvement, service recipient rights, infection prevention and control, physical structure, management and leadership, and general facilities were among the key recurring concepts in all models. In the study of factors affecting the accreditation model of limited surgery facilities in Iran, 5 main topics and 43 subtopics were identified. Conclusion: Although the current assessment model of limited surgery facilities is an appropriate tool for evaluation, it still needs to be improved because of the uncertainty of evaluation model, training of accreditors and the content of standards. [GMJ.2020;9:e1729]

 

References

Shams A, Yarmohammadian M, Hassanzadeh A, Hayati Abbarik H. Determining the Criteria of Customer-Orientation in Education: Viewpoints of Students at Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. HIMJ. 2011;8(22):1086-96. Vanoli M, Traisci G, Franchini A, Benetti G, Serra P, Monti MA. A program of professional accreditation of hospital wards by the Italian Society of Internal Medicine (SIMI): self-versus peer-evaluation. Intern Emerg Med. 2012;7(1):27-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-011-0684-6PMid:21833771 Sekimoto M, Imanaka Y, Kobayashi H, Okubo T, Kizu J, Kobuse H, et al. Impact of hospital accreditation on infection control programs in teaching hospitals in Japan. AJIC. 2008;36(3):212-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.04.276PMid:18371518 Shaw C, Bruneau C, Kutryba B, De Jongh G, Suñol R. Towards hospital standardization in Europe. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010;22(4):244-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzq030PMid:20576789 Rafizada A, editor. Comparative analysis of models in terms of performance objectives. Principles results and achievements. The second national conference on performance management; 2003. A. s. Hospital Organization and Management. Tehran: Jahan raeana Publishing; 2001. Ansari H afF. Hospital Management and Planning. Tehtan: Asharat Publishing; 2008. Emami Razavi H, Mohaghegh M, Korani H, M. M. A Look at Hospital Accreditation Standards. MOHME. 2010. Tabrizi J, Gharibi F, Ramezani M. Development of a national accreditation model in specialized clinics of hospitals. Hakim Res J. 2012;15(3):229-37. Teichler U, Arimoto A, Cummings WK. The design and methods of the comparative study. The Changing Academic Profession: Springer; 2013. p. 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6155-1_2 Arredondo A, Orozco E. Equity, governance and financing after health care reform: lessons from Mexico. INT J HEALTH PLAN M. 2008;23(1):37-49. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.913PMid:18000949 Barrowman L. Review of the implementation of the nurse prescribing role. On behalf for the Trust Nurses Association in Northern Ireland. NIPEC. 2007. Lacey A, Luff D. Qualitative data analysis: Trent Focus Sheffield; 2001. Rashidian A, Eccles M, Russell I. Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines' prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health policy. 2008;85(2):148-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.011PMid:17767976 Bryman A, Burgess B. Analyzing qualitative data: Routledge; 2002. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203413081 Shaw C. The external assessment of health services. WHHS Journal 2004;40(1):24-7. De Walcque C, Seuntjens B, Vermeyen K, Peeters G, Vinck I. Comparative study of hospital accreditation programs in Europe. HSR Journal. 2008. Jovanovic B. Hospital accreditation as method for assessing quality in health care. Archive of Oncology. 2005;13(3/4):156. AlKhenizan A, Shaw C. Assessment of the accreditation standards of the Central Board for Accreditation of Healthcare Institutions in Saudi Arabia against the principles of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua). ANN SAUDI MED. 2010;30(5):386-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.67082PMid:20697166 PMCid:PMC2941252 Pomey M-P, Lemieux-Charles L, Champagne F, Angus D, Shabah A, Contandriopoulos A-P. Does accreditation stimulate change? A study of the impact of the accreditation process on Canadian healthcare organizations. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-31PMid:20420685 PMCid:PMC2882897 Alkhenizan A, Shaw C. Impact of accreditation on the quality of healthcare services: a systematic review of the literature. ANN SAUDI MED. 2011;31(4):407-16. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.83204PMid:21808119 PMCid:PMC3156520 Ng K, Leung GK, Johnston JM, Cowling BJ. Factors affecting implementation of accreditation programmes and the impact of the accreditation process on quality improvement in hospitals: a SWOT analysis. HONG KONG MED J. 2013. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj134063PMid:24088588 Giovanelli L, Marinò L, Rotondo F, Fadda N, Ezza A, Amadori M. Developing a performance evaluation system for the Italian public healthcare sector. Public Money Manag. 2015;35(4):297-302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1047274 Telem DA, Talamini M, Altieri M, Yang J, Zhang Q, Pryor AD. The effect of national hospital accreditation in bariatric surgery on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. SURG OBES RELAT DIS. 2015;11(4):749-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.05.012PMid:26001555 Chagheri M, Amerion A. Challenges of the Hospital Accreditation Process in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Third Conference of hospital Chiefs and Managers; 2013. Ameryon A, Chaghery M, Tofighi S. The study of hospital accreditation procedure in selected countries and presentation of guidelines for IRAN: Teb va Tazkiyeh; 2013. Karimi S, Gholipour K, Kordi A, Bahmanziari N, Shokri A. Impact Of Hospitals Accreditation On Service Delivery From The Perspective Views Of Experts: A Qualitative Study. Payavard Salamat. [Research]. 2013;7(4):337-53. JCI. Joint Commission International. Accreditation Standards for Ambulatory Care. 3RD Edition, Standards-only version America; 2015. 2015. Mississippi. Department of Health in Mississippi State. Minimum Standard of Operation for Ambulatory Surgical Facilities. Jackson (Mississippi). 2016. AAAASF. American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities, Inc. Regular Standards and Checklist for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities Version 145 (March 2017) AAAASF Group. 2017. ACI. Accreditation Canada International (ACI). Independent Medical/Surgical Facilities Standards. Canada: Accreditation Canada. 2016. Alberta. College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. Non-Hospital Surgical Facility, Standards & Guidelines. v23 (March 2016) Alberta (Canada): ASCRS and ESCRS Published by Elsevier Inc. 2016. Dubai. Dubai Healthcare City Authority. Standards for Day Surgery. Dubai: Government of Dubai. 2018. Australia. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Day Procedure Services Accreditation Workbook. Sydney: ACSQHC. 2012. Madrid. Ministry of Health and Consumer Affairs. Day Surgery Unit Guide Standards and Recommendations. Madrid: Catálogo general de publicaciones oficiales. 2008. http://www.who.int/csr/don

Published

2020-06-25

Issue

Section

Original Article