Evaluation of Impacts of Cellular Metabolism on the Migration of Ovarian Cancer Cells by Two in Vitro Assays: A Method Comparison Study

Authors

  • Siamak Salami 1. Clinical Biochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  • Hossein Ghahremani 1. Clinical Biochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  • Majid Sirati-Sabet 1. Clinical Biochemistry Department, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i.1831

Keywords:

Ovarian Neoplasms; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Metabolism; Cell Migration; In Vitro Techniques

Abstract

Background: Alteration of metabolic pathways in cancer cells can intensely modulate their migration as an important step in invasion and metastasis. Ketogenic diet showed some contradictory results in cancer patients. In this study the impact of metabolic reprogramming of A2780CP as a model of ovarian cancer stem-like cells on cell migration by two in vitro methods: wound healing and soft agar colony-forming assays. Materials and Methods: short term and long term metabolic reprogramming were done by restriction of glucose to 250mg/L with or without enrichment with beta-hydroxybutyrate (5 milimolar) for 48 hours and 30 days, respectively. Wound healing assay was done and the wound ratio was calculated for 24 and 48 hours. Soft agar colony formation assay was also done in treated and control cells. For method comparison, ten biological replicates were analyzed in triplicate. Results: Migration of A2780CP ovarian cancer stem-like cells were significantly alleviated by long term glucose restriction but no significant changes were observed in short term study. Beta-hydroxybutyrate enrichment did not produce significant impacts on glucose restriction in short or long term studies. Conclusion: The results of colony formation in soft agar and wound or scratch healing assay were in good correlation and convergence which could be used interchangeably in the investigation of metabolic reprogramming in cancer cells. [GMJ.2020;9:e1831]

References

Pijuan J, Barcelo C, Moreno DF, Maiques O, Siso P, Marti RM et al. In vitro Cell Migration, Invasion, and Adhesion Assays: From Cell Imaging to Data Analysis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019;7:107. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2019.00107PMid:31259172 PMCid:PMC6587234 Cappiello F, Casciaro B, Mangoni ML. A Novel In Vitro Wound Healing Assay to Evaluate Cell Migration. J Vis Exp. 2018(133). https://doi.org/10.3791/56825PMid:29608162 PMCid:PMC5931780 Grada A, Otero-Vinas M, Prieto-Castrillo F, Obagi Z, Falanga V. Research Techniques Made Simple: Analysis of Collective Cell Migration Using the Wound Healing Assay. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(2):e11-e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2016.11.020PMid:28110712 Martinotti S, Ranzato E. Scratch Wound Healing Assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/7651_2019_259PMid:31414347 Borowicz S, Van Scoyk M, Avasarala S, Karuppusamy Rathinam MK, Tauler J, Bikkavilli RK et al. The soft agar colony formation assay. J Vis Exp. 2014(92):e51998. https://doi.org/10.3791/51998PMCid:PMC4353381 Horibata S, Vo TV, Subramanian V, Thompson PR, Coonrod SA. Utilization of the Soft Agar Colony Formation Assay to Identify Inhibitors of Tumorigenicity in Breast Cancer Cells. J Vis Exp. 2015(99):e52727. https://doi.org/10.3791/52727PMid:26067809 PMCid:PMC4542786 Finley LWS. Metabolic signal curbs cancer-cell migration. Nature. 2019;571(7763):39-40. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01934-9PMid:31263261 Magee BA, Potezny N, Rofe AM, Conyers RA. The inhibition of malignant cell growth by ketone bodies. Australian Journal of Experimental Biology and Medical Science. 1979;57(5):529-39. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.1979.54PMid:548019 Seyfried TN, Flores RE, Poff AM, D'Agostino DP. Cancer as a metabolic disease: implications for novel therapeutics. Carcinogenesis. 2013;35(3):515-27. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgt480PMid:24343361 PMCid:PMC3941741 Woolf EC, Curley KL, Liu Q, Turner GH, Charlton JA, Preul MC et al. The ketogenic diet alters the hypoxic response and affects expression of proteins associated with angiogenesis, invasive potential and vascular permeability in a mouse glioma model. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0130357. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130357PMid:26083629 PMCid:PMC4470583 Tseng P-L, Chen C-W, Hu K-H, Cheng H-C, Lin Y-H, Tsai W-H et al. The decrease of glycolytic enzyme hexokinase 1 accelerates tumor malignancy via deregulating energy metabolism but sensitizes cancer cells to 2-deoxyglucose inhibition. Oncotarget. 2018;9(27):18949-69. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.24855PMid:29721175 PMCid:PMC5922369 O'Flanagan CH, Smith LA, McDonell SB, Hursting SD. When less may be more: calorie restriction and response to cancer therapy. BMC medicine. 2017;15(1):106. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0873-xPMid:28539118 PMCid:PMC5442682 Chung H-Y, Park YK. Rationale, feasibility and acceptability of ketogenic diet for cancer treatment. Journal of cancer prevention. 2017;22(3):127. https://doi.org/10.15430/JCP.2017.22.3.127PMid:29018777 PMCid:PMC5624453 Karakuş F, Eyol E, Yılmaz K, Ünüvar S. Inhibition of cell proliferation, migration and colony formation of LS174T Cells by carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Afr Health Sci. 2018;18(4):1303-10. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v18i4.51PMid:30766596 PMCid:PMC6354875 Gupta R, Yang Q, Dogra SK, Wajapeyee N. Serine hydroxymethyl transferase 1 stimulates pro-oncogenic cytokine expression through sialic acid to promote ovarian cancer tumor growth and progression. Oncogene. 2017;36(28):4014-24. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.37PMid:28288142 PMCid:PMC5509519 Saha S, Ghosh M, Dutta SK. The dual-hit metabolic modulator LDCA synergistically potentiates doxorubicin to selectively combat cancer-associated hallmarks. RSC advances. 2017;7(84):53322-33. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA08625C

Published

2020-08-16

How to Cite

Salami, S., Ghahremani, H., & Sirati-Sabet, M. (2020). Evaluation of Impacts of Cellular Metabolism on the Migration of Ovarian Cancer Cells by Two in Vitro Assays: A Method Comparison Study: . Galen Medical Journal, 9, e1831. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v9i.1831

Issue

Section

Original Article