Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in an Iranian Population
Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients
Keywords:
Composite Resins; Dental Restoration Failure; Dental CariesAbstract
Background: This study aimed to assess the reasons for composite restoration replacement in patients in Ahwaz, Iran. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 231 patients presenting to the dental clinic of the School of Dentistry, Ahwaz Jundishapour University in 2017-2018 who required composite restoration replacement. A senior dental student performed a clinical dental examination of patients using a dental explorer, a dental mirror, and dental floss, and the decayed, missed, and filled (DMF) index of the patients was recorded. The patients also underwent radiography. The reason for composite restoration replacement was recorded. Data were analyzed by independent t-test, Chi-square test, one-way ANOVA, and LSD test (alpha=0.05). Results: Of 231 patients, 104 (45%) were males and 127 (55%) were females. The majority of the patients (27.3%) were between 40-50 years and had Class II malocclusion (62%). The mean DMF of patients was 3.48±1.36. Maxillary anterior teeth comprised the majority of the teeth that required restoration replacement. Secondary caries was the most common cause of restoration replacement (23.4%), followed by a combination of secondary caries and pain or dentin hypersensitivity (15.1%). The reason for restoration replacement had a significant association with age with primary caries being most prevalent in the 41-50 age group (P<0.05) but had no significant association with gender or class of occlusion (P>0.05). Patients requiring restoration replacement due to primary and secondary caries, and broken or cracked restorations had significantly higher mean DMF values compared to those with other reasons (P=0.031). Conclusion: Secondary caries was the most common reason for composite restoration replacement in the study population, and the reason for restoration replacement had a significant association with age and DMF of patients.
References
Ernst CP, Martin M, Stuff S, Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clinical oral investigations. 2001 Sep;5(3):148-55.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s007840100117
PMid:11642558
Demarco FF, Corrêa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dental materials: official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2012 Jan;28(1):87-101.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.003
PMid:22192253
Miyazaki M, Onose H, Moore BK. Effect of operator variability on dentin bond strength of two-step bonding systems. American journal of dentistry. 2000 Apr;13(2):101-4.
McCracken MS, Gordan VV, Litaker MS, Funkhouser E, Fellows JL, Shamp DG, Qvist V, Meral JS, Gilbert GH, National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Collaborative Group. A 24-month evaluation of amalgam and resin-based composite restorations: Findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2013 Jun;144(6):583-93.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0169
PMid:23729455 PMCid:PMC3694730
Yang JN, Raj JD, Sherlin H. Effects of Preheated Composite on Micro leakage-An in-vitro Study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016 Jun;10(6):ZC36-8.
https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/18084.7980
PMid:27504407 PMCid:PMC4963767
Mjör IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 2000 Jun;58(3):97-101.
https://doi.org/10.1080/000163500429208
PMid:10933556
Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Overton DA, Gordon MK. Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2004 Aug;135(8):1127-65.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2004.0371
PMid:15387051
Lucarotti PS, Holder RL, Burke FJ. Outcome of direct restorations placed within the general dental services in England and Wales (Part 1): variation by type of restoration and re-intervention. Journal of dentistry. 2005 Nov;33(10):805-15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.03.008
PMid:16221519
Vieira AR, Silva MB, Souza KK, Arnôldo Filho VA, Rosenblatt A, Modesto A. A Pragmatic Study Shows Failure of Dental Composite Fillings Is Genetically Determined: A Contribution to the Discussion on Dental Amalgams. Frontiers in medicine. 2017 Nov 6;4:186.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2017.00186
PMid:29164121 PMCid:PMC5681741
Brunthaler A, König F, Lucas T, Sperr W, Schedle A. Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth. Clinical Oral Investigations. 2003 May 27;7(2):63-70.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0206-7
PMid:12768463
Kermanshah H, Khorsandian H. Comparison of microleakage of Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive with methacrylate resin in Class V restorations by two methods: Swept source optical coherence tomography and dye penetration. Dental Research Journal. 2017 Jul 1;14(4):272-81.
https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.211651
PMid:28928782 PMCid:PMC5553256
Sadeghi M, Lynch C. The viewpoints of restorative dentistry specialists towards the teaching of repair versus replacement of defective direct composite restorations in Iranian . Dental Schools. 2011;10:79-90.
Maryniuk GA, Kaplan SH. Longevity of restorations: survey results of dentists' estimates and attitudes. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 1986 Jan;112(1):39-45.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0012
PMid:3484758
Qvist J, Qvist V, Mjör IA. Placement and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark. Acta odontologica Scandinavica. 1990 Oct;48(5):297-303.
https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359009033620
PMid:2251918
Soares AC, Cavalheiro A. A review of amalgam and composite longevity of posterior restorations. Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentaria e Cirurgia Maxilofacial. 2010 Jul 1;51(3):155-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1646-2890(10)70005-4
Chrysanthakopoulos NA. Reasons for Placement and Replacement of Resin-based Composite Restorations in Greece. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects. 2011;5(3):87-93.
Abolghasemzade F, Alaghehmand H, Judi R. The Reasons for Composite Restoration Replacement in Patients of the Restorative Department of Babol Dental School. Jentashapir Journal of Health Research. 2015 Dec 1;31:11-8.
https://doi.org/10.17795/jjhr-25600
Braga SR, Vasconcelos BT, de Paula Macedo MR, Martins VR, Sobral MA. Reasons for placement and replacement of direct restorative materials in Brazil. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985). 2007 Apr;38(4):e189-94.
Frost PM. An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice. Primary dental care: journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK). 2002 Jan;9(1):31-6.
https://doi.org/10.1308/135576102322547548
PMid:11901789
Mahmood S, Chohan AN, Al-Jannakh M, Al-Baker H, Smales RJ. Placement and replacement of dental restorations. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP. 2004 Oct;14(10):589-92.
Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Operative dentistry. 2004;29(5):481-508.
Tyas MJ. Placement and replacement of restorations by selected practitioners. Australian dental journal. 2005 Jun;50(2):81-127.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2005.tb00345.x
PMid:16050086
Asghar S, Ali A, Rashid S, Hussain T. Replacement of resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth. Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan: JCPSP. 2010 Oct;20(10):639-43.
Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K, van Dijken JW, Funegård U, Lindberg A, Nilsson M. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Journal of dentistry. 2009 Sep;37(9):673-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.04.010
PMid:19477572
Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. Journal of Dentistry. 2004 Jul 1;32(5):379-83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.02.005
PMid:15193786
Deligeorgi V, Mjör IA, Wilson NH. An overview of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations. Primary dental care: journal of the Faculty of General Dental Practitioners (UK). 2001 Jan;8(1):5-11.
https://doi.org/10.1308/135576101771799335
PMid:11405031
Opdam NJ, Bronkhorst EM, Roeters JM, Loomans BA. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Dental Materials: Official Publication of the Academy of Dental Materials. 2006 Jan 18;23(1):2-8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.036
PMid:16417916
Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, Leroux BG, Rue T, Leitão J, DeRouen TA. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939). 2007 Jun 1;138(6):775-83.
https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0265
PMid:17545266
Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Cheung SW, Mjör IA. Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. Journal of dentistry. 2001 Jul;29(5):317-24.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00022-7
PMid:11472803
Svanberg M, Mjör IA, Orstavik D. Mutans streptococci in plaque from margins of amalgam, composite, and glass-ionomer restorations. Journal of dental research. 1990 Mar;69(3):861-4.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690030601
PMid:2109000
Page J, Welbury RR. Operative treatment of dental caries. In: Welbury RR, ed Paediatric Dentistry, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1999:121-3.
Mjör IA, Jokstad A. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials. Journal of dentistry. 1993 Dec;21(6):338-43.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90006-C
PMid:8258583
Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Operative dentistry. 1995;20(1):34-8.
Kidd EA, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. Journal of dental research. 1995 May;74(5):1206-11.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740051001
PMid:7540634
Pimenta LA, Navarro MF, Consolaro A. Secondary caries around amalgam restorations. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1995 Sep;74(3):219-22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80126-X
PMid:7473273
Gaengler P, Hoyer I, Montag R. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: the 10-year report. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2001;3(2):185-94.
Raskin A, Michotte-Theall B, Vreven J, Wilson NH. Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. Journal of dentistry. 1999 Jan;27(1):13-9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00026-8
PMid:9922607
Mair LH. Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany: 1985). 1998 Aug;29(8):483-90.
Forss H, Widstrom E. Reasons for restorative therapy and the longevity of restorations in adults. Acta Odontol Scand. 2004;62:82-6.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310008733
PMid:15198387
Mjör IA, Gordan VV. Failure, repair, refurbishing and longevity of restorations. Operative dentistry. 2002;27(5):528-34.
Nikaido T, Takada T, Kitasako Y, Ogata M, Shimada Y, Yoshikawa T, Nakajima M, Otsuki M, Tagami J, Burrow MF. Retrospective study of five-year clinical performance of direct composite restorations using a self-etching primer adhesive system. Dental materials journal. 2006 Sep;25(3):611-5.
https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.611
PMid:17076335
Brukiene V, Aleksejuniene J, Balciuniene I. Dental restorations quality in Lithuanian adolescents. Stomatologija. 2005 Jan 1;7(4):103-9.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Galen Medical Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
