In Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Silanizing on the Repaired Bond Strength of Short-Fiber Composites Subjected to Surface Treatment with an Er;Cr:YSGG Laser, Sandblasting, or Bur

Effectiveness of silanizing on the repaired bond strength of Short-fiber composite

Authors

  • Faramarz Zakavi Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • Nasrin Mohamadi Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran
  • Azita Kaviani Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry. Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13iSP1.3646

Keywords:

Microshear Bond Strength; Short Fiber-Reinforced Composite; Surface Treatment; Laser Treatment; Silanization

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of various interfacial surface treatments on the repair micro shear bond strength (μSBS) of aged short fiber-reinforced composite (SFRC). Methods and Materials: The substrate and repair composite material used in the fabrication of eighty samples were SFRC (Ever-X posterior, GC). Based on the mechanical roughening method, the samples were divided into four categories: diamond bur, sandblasting, laser treatment, and a control group. Then, they were split into two groups using the chemical conditioning method: those using a universal glue that contains silane and those using a separate silane step before the universal adhesive that contains silane. After 40 days of immersion in distilled water at 37°C, the specimens were removed. Universal testing equipment was used to implement SBS testing. Using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), the surface topography of the composite material was examined after the roughening procedures. Results: Although the laser group had the highest μSBS value, there was no statistically significant difference in μSBS across the groups (P > 0.05). The results for μSBS were also not significantly different when using universal adhesive with or without an extra silanizing step (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Based on the results, the other groups' μSBS values were lower than those of the laser group. Incorporating a distinct silanization process before applying the universal adhesive that contained silane did not improve the μSBS either.

References

Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, MORAES RR, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?. Braz. Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31:e56.

https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2017.vol31.0056

Demarco FF, Collares K, Coelho-de-Souza FH, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Anterior composite restorations: A systematic review on long-term survival and reasons for failure. Dent. Mater. J. 2015 Oct 1;31(10):1214-24.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.07.005

PMid:26303655

Opdam NJ, Van De Sande FH, Bronkhorst E, Cenci MS, Bottenberg P, Pallesen U, Gaengler P, Lindberg A, Huysmans MC, Van Dijken JW. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. Res. 2014 Oct;93(10):943-9.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034514544217

PMid:25048250 PMCid:PMC4293707

Oskoee PA, Oskoee SS, Rikhtegaran S, Pournaghi-Azar F, Gholizadeh S, Aleyasin Y, Kasrae S. Effect of various laser surface treatments on repair shear bond strength of aged silorane-based composite. JLMS. 2017;8(4):186.

https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.34

PMid:29071025 PMCid:PMC5642167

Fernández E, Martin J, Vildósola P, Junior OO, Gordan V, Mjor I, Bersezio C, Estay J, De Andrade MF, Moncada G. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. J. Dent. 2015 Feb 1;43(2):279-86.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.015

PMid:24907560

Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Giuseppetti AA, Eichmiller FC. Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. Dent. Mater. J. 2003 Jul 1;19(5):359-67.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00078-7

PMid:12742430

Garoushi S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. Dent. Mater. J. 2007 Nov 1;23(11):1356-62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.11.017

PMid:17204319

Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent. Mater. J. 2006 Apr 1;22(4):382-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.04.027

PMid:16055180

Garoushi S, Säilynoja E, Vallittu PK, Lassila L. Physical properties and depth of cure of a new short fiber reinforced composite. Dent. Mater. J. 2013 Aug 1;29(8):835-41.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.016

PMid:23726127

Garoushi SK, Hatem M, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. The effect of short fiber composite base on microleakage and load-bearing capacity of posterior restorations. Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand.2015 Jan 1;1(1):6-12.

https://doi.org/10.3109/23337931.2015.1017576

PMid:28642894 PMCid:PMC5433219

Keulemans F, Garoushi S, Lassila L. Fillings and core build-ups. InA clinical guide to fibre reinforced composites (FRCs) in dentistry. Woodhead Publishing. 2017. 131-163.

https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100607-8.00009-5

Molnár, J., et al. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars restored with different dentin replacement materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2022; 38(4):83-93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.007

PMid:35227528

Kirsch J, Tchorz J, Hellwig E, Tauböck TT, Attin T, Hannig C. Decision criteria for replacement of fillings: a retrospective study. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2016 Nov;2(2):121-8.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.30

PMid:29744158 PMCid:PMC5839197

Casagrande L, Laske M, Bronkhorst EM, Huysmans MC, Opdam NJ. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations-A practice based study. J. Dent. 2017 Sep 1;64:30-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.002

PMid:28602850

Molnár J, Fráter M, Sáry T, Braunitzer G, Vallittu PK, Lassila L, Garoushi S. Fatigue performance of endodontically treated molars restored with different dentin replacement materials. Dent. Mater. J. 2022 Apr 1;38(4):e83-93.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.02.007

PMid:35227528

Altinci P, Mutluay M, Tezvergil-Mutluay A. Repair bond strength of nanohybrid composite resins with a universal adhesive. Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):10-9.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1412262

PMid:29250576 PMCid:PMC5727432

Ahmadizenouz G, Esmaeili B, Taghvaei A, Jamali Z, Jafari T, Daneshvar FA, Khafri S. Effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects. 2016;10(1):9.

https://doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2016.002

PMid:27092209 PMCid:PMC4831615

Rossato DM, Bandeca MC, Saade EG, Lizarelli RF, Bagnato VS, Saad JR. Influence of Er: YAG laser on surface treatment of aged composite resin to repair restoration. Laser Phys. 2009 Nov;19:2144-9.

https://doi.org/10.1134/S1054660X09210105

Ritter AV, Sulaiman TA, Altitinchi A, Bair E, Baratto-Filho F, Gonzaga CC, Correr GM. Composite-composite adhesion as a function of adhesive-composite material and surface treatment. Oper. Dent. 2019 Jul 1;44(4):348-54.

https://doi.org/10.2341/18-037-L

PMid:30444693

Cuevas-Suarez CE, de Oliveira da Rosa WL, Lund RG, da Silva AF, Piva E. Bonding performance of universal adhesives: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2019 Jan 1;21(1).

Valente LL, Sarkis-Onofre R, Goncalves AP, Fernandez E, Loomans B, Moraes RR. Repair bond strength of dental composites: systematic review and meta-analysis. IJAA. 2016 Sep 1;69:15-26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.020

Loomans BA, Özcan M. Intraoral repair of direct and indirect restorations: procedures and guidelines. Oper. Dent. 2016 Sep 1;41(S7):S68-78.

https://doi.org/10.2341/15-269-LIT

PMid:26918932

Kiomarsi N, Saburian P, Chiniforush N, Karazifard MJ, Hashemikamangar SS. Effect of thermocycling and surface treatment on repair bond strength of composite. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Aug;9(8):e945.

https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.53721

PMid:28936282 PMCid:PMC5601109

Martos R, Hegedüs V, Szalóki M, Blum IR, Lynch CD, Hegedüs C. A randomised controlled study on the effects of different surface treatments and adhesive self-etch functional monomers on the immediate repair bond strength and integrity of the repaired resin composite interface. J. Dent. 2019 Jun 1;85:57-63.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.04.012

PMid:31054292

Aquino, C., et al. Repair bond strength and leakage of non-aged and aged bulk-fill composite. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020; 18(1):783-91.

Marx I, Op't Hof J. The Er, Cr: YSGG hydrokinetic laser system for dentistry--clinical applications. SADJ. 2002 Aug 1;57(8):323-6.

Soares Machado P, Cadore Rodrigues AC, Trota Chaves E, Henrique Susin A, Felipe Valandro L, Rocha Pereira GK, Pivetta Rippe M. Surface Treatments and Adhesives Used to Increase the Bond Strength Between Polyetheretherketone and Resin-based Dental Materials: A Scoping Review. J Adhes Dent. 2022 Jan 1;24(1).

Bayraktar Y, Demirtağ Z, Çelik Ç. Effect of Er: YAG laser pulse duration on repair bond strength of resin-based and hybrid CAD/CAM restorative materials. JAST. 2022 Mar 19;36(6):606-19.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1932301

Da Rosa WL, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Dent. 2015 Jul 1;43(7):765-76.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.04.003

PMid:25882585

Teixeira Mendes L, Loomans BA, Opdam NJ, Lopes da Silva C, Casagrande L, Larissa Lenzi T. Silane Coupling Agents are Beneficial for Resin Composite Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of In Vitro Studies. J Adhes Dent. 2020 Sep 1;22(5).

Matinlinna JP, Lung CY, Tsoi JK. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dent. Mater. J. 2018 Jan 1;34(1):13-28.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.002

PMid:28969848

Silva CL, Scherer MM, Mendes LT, Casagrande L, Leitune VC, Lenzi TL. Does use of silane-containing universal adhesive eliminate the need for silane application in direct composite repair?. Braz. Oral Res. 2020 May 8;34:e045.

https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0045

PMid:32401935

Ayar MK, Guven ME, Burduroglu HD, Erdemir F. Repair of aged bulk‐fill composite with posterior composite: Effect of different surface treatments. JERD. 2019 May;31(3):246-52.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12391

PMid:30194910

Atalay C, Yazici AR, Ozgunaltay G. Bond strengths of bulk-fill resin composite repairs: effect of different surface treatment protocols in vitro. JAST. 2018 May 3;32(9):921-30.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2017.1395162

Lizarelli RD, Moriyama LT, Bagnato VS. Ablation of composite resins using Er: YAG laser-comparison with enamel and dentin. LSM. 2003 Aug;33(2):132-9.

https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.10196

PMid:12913886

Duran I, Ural Ç, Yilmaz B, Tatar N. Effects of Er: YAG laser pretreatment with different energy levels on bond strength of repairing composite materials. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Jun 1;33(6):320-5.

https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2014.3859

PMid:26067940

Murray AK, Attrill DC, Dickinson MR. The effects of XeCl laser etching of Ni-Cr alloy on bond strengths to composite resin: a comparison with sandblasting procedures. Dent. Mater. J. 2005 Jun 1;21(6):538-44.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.021

PMid:15904696

Cho SD, Rajitrangson P, Matis BA, Platt JA. Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser, air abrasion, and silane application on repaired shear bond strength of composites. Oper. Dent. 2013 Apr 1;38(3):E58-66.

https://doi.org/10.2341/11-054-L

PMid:23131133

Etemadi A, Shahabi S, Chiniforush N, Pordel E, Azarbayejani Z, Heidari S. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) evaluation of composite surface irradiated by different powers of Er: YAG laser. JLMS. 2015;6(2):80.

Gökçe B, Özpinar B, Dündar M, Cömlekoglu E, Sen BH, Güngör MA. Bond strengths of all-ceramics: acid vs laser etching. Oper. Dent. 2007 Mar 1;32(2):173-8.

https://doi.org/10.2341/06-52

PMid:17427827

Bektas ÖÖ, Eren D, Siso SH, Akin GE. Effect of thermocycling on the bond strength of composite resin to bur and laser treated composite resin. LIMS. 2012 Jul 1;27(4):723.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-011-0958-2

PMid:21833556

Kimyai S, Mohammadi N, Navimipour EJ, Rikhtegaran S. Comparison of the effect of three mechanical surface treatments on the repair bond strength of a laboratory composite. Photomed Laser Surg. 2010 Oct 1;28(S2):S-25.

https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2009.2598

PMid:20950189

Oskoee PA, Mohammadi N, Chaharom ME, Kimyai S, Azar FP, Rikhtegaran S, Shojaeei M. Effect of surface treatment with Er; Cr: YSSG, Nd: YAG, and CO2 lasers on repair shear bond strength of a silorane-based composite resin. Journal of dental research, dental clinics, dental prospects. 2013;7(2):61.

Dursun MN, Ergin E, Ozgunaltay G. The effect of different surface preparation methods and various aging periods on microtensile bond strength for composite resin repair. Niger. J. Clin. Pract. 2021 Feb 1;24(2):282-91.

https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_83_20

PMid:33605921

Bijelic‐Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition layer of composite resins: effects of layer thickness and surface layer treatment on the interlayer bond strength. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2015 Feb;123(1):53-60.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12167

PMid:25556290

AlJehani YA, Baskaradoss JK, Geevarghese A, AlShehry MA, Vallittu PK. Shear bond strength between fiber‐reinforced composite and veneering resin composites with various adhesive resin systems. J. Prosthodont. 2016 Jul;25(5):392-401.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12315

PMid:26215932

Omran TA, Garoushi S, Lassila L, Shinya A, Vallittu PK. Bonding interface affects the load-bearing capacity of bilayered composites. Dent. Mater. J. 2019 Nov 26;38(6):1002-11.

https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-304

PMid:31666485

Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition of autopolymerization of polymethylmethacrylate-glass fibre composite. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Med. 1997 Aug;8(8):489-92.

Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Watanabe H, Johnson WW, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Relationship between mechanical properties and bond durability of short fiber‐reinforced resin composite with universal adhesive. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2016 Oct;124(5):480-9.

https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12291

PMid:27696555

Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LV, Keulemans F, Vallittu PK. Mechanical and structural characterization of discontinuous fiber-reinforced dental resin composite. J. Dent. 2016 Sep 1;52:70-8.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.009

PMid:27449703

Fornazari IA, Wille I, Meda EM, Brum RT, Souza EM. Effect of surface treatment, silane, and universal adhesive on microshear bond strength of nanofilled composite repairs. Oper. Dent. 2017 Jul 1;42(4):367-74.

https://doi.org/10.2341/16-259-L

PMid:28402733

Çakir NN, Demirbuga S, Balkaya H, Karadaş M. Bonding performance of universal adhesives on composite repairs, with or without silane application. JCD. 2018 May 1;21(3):263-8.

https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_11_18

PMid:29899627 PMCid:PMC5977773

Loomans BA, Cardoso MV, Roeters FJ, Opdam NJ, De Munck J, Huysmans MC, Van Meerbeek B. Is there one optimal repair technique for all composites?. Dent. Mater. J. 2011 Jul 1;27(7):701-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.03.013

PMid:21571359

Eliasson ST, Dahl JE. Effect of curing and silanizing on composite repair bond strength using an improved micro-tensile test method. Acta Biomater. Odontol. Scand. 2017 Jan 1;3(1):21-9.

https://doi.org/10.1080/23337931.2017.1301211

PMid:28642928 PMCid:PMC5463344

Dogan E, Cevval Ozkocak BB. The efficacy of Er, Cr: YSGG laser and contemporary universal adhesive systems on composite resin repair bond strength: an in vitro study. Odontology. 2024 Apr 3:1-2.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-024-00932-2

PMid:38568323

Ding Y, Tang H, Shi W, He Q, Zhai Z. Enhancement of interfacial strength of overmolded hybrid structures of short fiber reinforced polyamide 6 on continuous fiber reinforced epoxy composites under various surface pretreatments. Polym. Compos. 2022 Feb;43(2):1038-47.

https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.26432

Shagor RM, Abedin F, Asmatulu R. Mechanical and thermal properties of carbon fiber reinforced composite with silanized graphene as nano-inclusions. J. Compos. Mater. 2021 Mar;55(5):597-608.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0021998320953183

Lassila L, Tuokko J, Suni A, Garoushi S, Vallittu PK. Effect of interfacial surface treatment on bond strength of particulate-filled composite to short fiber-reinforced composite. Biomater. investig. dent. 2022 Dec 31;9(1):33-40.

https://doi.org/10.1080/26415275.2022.2070489

PMid:35559270 PMCid:PMC9090340

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Zakavi, F., Mohamadi, N., & Kaviani, A. (2024). In Vitro Investigation of the Effect of Silanizing on the Repaired Bond Strength of Short-Fiber Composites Subjected to Surface Treatment with an Er;Cr:YSGG Laser, Sandblasting, or Bur: Effectiveness of silanizing on the repaired bond strength of Short-fiber composite . Galen Medical Journal, 13(SP1), e3646. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13iSP1.3646