Comparison of the Effects of Video Modeling and Clinician Modeling on Naming Deficiency in Aphasic Patients

Authors

  • Shohre Kaviani Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  • Afshin Samaei Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Centre, Department of Internal Medicine, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
  • Ehsan Shahverdi 1 Blood Transfusion Research Center, High Institute for Research and Education in Transfusion Medicine, Tehran, Iran 2 Blood and Cancer Research Center, Mahak Pediatric Cancer Treatment and Research Center, Tehran, Iran
  • Fatemeh Kasbi Neuromuscular Rehabilitation Research Center, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v8i.1158

Keywords:

Aphasia, Video Modeling, Clinician Modeling, Naming Skills

Abstract

Background:  Aphasia is the most frequent disorder that could occur following a stroke. Aphasia has a negative impact on the patient's communication ability through language. One of the common consequences of aphasia is naming deficits that can lead to communication disorders. Therefore, the treatment of aphasia is necessary. The aim of the current study was to investigate the effect of video modeling and clinician modeling on naming skills of patients with chronic aphasia.Materials and Methods: The design of this prospective single subject study was A‑B‑A that performed on four patients with chronic aphasia. participated. This study was administered during three phases including the baseline (three sessions); the intervention (nine sessions); and a follow-up phase (three sessions). The outcome measure was taken in three phases including baseline, intervention, and follow-up. For each patient, the naming score for items modeled by the clinician, the naming score for items modeled video modeling by other, the naming score for self-video modeling, and the reaction time score were recorded.Result: A total of three patients complete the study and one of them refused to continue treatment. The naming score of all modeling types increased in all patients. In the other words, the intervention helped the patients be improved in naming. Also, the results of the reaction time indicated that the video modeling, as well as clinician modeling, could decrease the response time that means the intervention could increase the speed of retrieval processes. Conclusion:In our study, all three types of modeling could improve the naming scores in patients with chronic aphasia. Additionally, the findings demonstrate that the clinician and video modeling might increase mental processing for naming verbally. [GMJ. 2019;8:e1158]

References

Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan; 1997. Bandura A. Social learning theory Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977. Bellini S, Akullian J. A meta-analysis of video modeling and video self-modeling interventions for children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders. Except Child. 2007;73(3):264-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707300301 Moore DW, Anderson A, Treccase F, Deppeler J, Furlonger B, Didden R. A video-based package to teach a child with autism spectrum disorder to write her name. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2013;25(5):493-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-012-9325-x Moore JW, Fisher WW. The effects of videotape modeling on staff acquisition of functional analysis methodology. J Appl Behav Anal. 2007;40(1):197-202. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.24-06PMCid:PMC1868815 Rosales R, Gongola L, Homlitas C. An evaluation of video modeling with embedded instructions to teach implementation of stimulus preference assessments. J Appl Behav Anal. 2015;48(1):209-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.174PMid:25927112 Weldy CR, Rapp JT, Capocasa K. Training staff to implement brief stimulus preference assessments. J Appl Behav Anal. 2014;47(1):214-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.98PMid:24452818 Ergenekon Y. Teaching Basic First-Aid Skills against Home Accidents to Children with Autism through Video Modeling. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice. 2012;12(4):2759-66. Sani-Bozkurt S, Ozen A. Effectiveness and efficiency of peer and adult models used in video modeling in teaching pretend play skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2015;50(1):71. Starek J, McCullagh P. The effect of self-modeling on the performance of beginning swimmers. The Sport Psychologist. 1999;13(3):269-87. https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.13.3.269 Dryer E. Effectiveness of video modeling as an intervention technique for Broca's aphasia: Arkansas State University; 2016. Berthier ML. Poststroke aphasia. Drugs & aging. 2005;22(2):163-82. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200522020-00006PMid:15733022 Khatoonabadi AR, Nakhostin-Ansari N, Piran A, Tahmasian H. Development, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Persian Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test in patients with post-stroke aphasia. Iran J Neurol. 2015;14(2):101. PMid:26056555 PMCid:PMC4449390 Nilipour R. persian aphasia naming Test. Tehran: University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences. 2012. Tahanzadeh B, Soleymani Z, Khoddami SM, Mehri A, Jalaie S. Validity and reliability of oral picture-naming test in aphasic adults. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences. 2012;21(4):84-93. Mokhlesin M, Ahadi H, Bakhtiari J, Ahmadizadeh Z. Persian norms for affective dimensions and lexico semantic features of words. Koomesh. 2015:60-76. Kavian S, Khatoonabadi AR, Ansari NN, Saadati M. A Single–subject Study to Examine the Effects of Constrained–induced Aphasia Therapy on Naming Deficit. Int J Prev Med. 2014;5(6):782. PMid:25013699 PMCid:PMC4085932 Lee CYQ, Anderson A, Moore DW. Using video modeling to toilet train a child with autism. J Dev Phys Disabil. 2014;26(2):123-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-013-9348-y Bray MA, Kehle TJ. Self-modeling as an intervention for stuttering. School Psych Rev. 1996. Harasym J, Langevin M, Kully D. Video self-modeling as a post-treatment fluency recovery strategy for adults. J Fluency Disord. 2015;44:32-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfludis.2015.01.003PMid:25707576 Mechling LC, Pridgen LS, Cronin BA. Computer-based video instruction to teach students with intellectual disabilities to verbally respond to questions and make purchases in fast food restaurants. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2005:47-59. Montgomerie R, Little SG, Akin-Little A. Video Self-Modeling as an Intervention for Oral Reading Fluency. NZ J Psychol. 2014;43(1). Ylvisaker M, Turkstra LS, Coelho C, editors. Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Seminars in speech and language; 2005: Copyright© 2005 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA. Nikopoulos CK, Nikopoulou-Smyrni P, Konstantopoulos K. Effects of video modeling on emerging speech in an adult with traumatic brain injury: Preliminary findings. Brain Inj. 2013;27(11):1256-62. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2013.809550PMid:23909660 Shipley-Benamou R, Lutzker JR, Taubman M. Teaching daily living skills to children with autism through instructional video modeling. J Posit Behav Interv. 2002;4(3):166-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007020040030501 Godecke E. Efficacy of aphasia therapy in the acute setting. Curtin University of Technology.; 2008. Ayres KM, Langone J. Intervention and instruction with video for students with autism: A review of the literature. Educ Train Dev Disabil. 2005:183-96. Delano ME. Video modeling interventions for individuals with autism. Remedial Spec Educ. 2007;28(1):33-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280010401 Mechling L. The effect of instructor-created video programs to teach students with disabilities: A literature review. J Spec Educ Technol. 2005;20(2):25-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/016264340502000203

Published

2019-01-01

Issue

Section

Case Report/Series