Factors Affecting the Variation in Sexual Activity and Response before and During Pregnancy among Pregnant Women in Rasht City, Northern Iran

Authors

  • Shiva Alizadeh Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • hedyeh Riazi Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Hamid Alavi Majd Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Hamid Alavi Majd Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  • Giti Ozgoli Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v8i.1531

Keywords:

Sexual Activity, Sexual Function, Pregnancy

Abstract

Background: Pregnancy is one of the most sensitive periods in a woman’s life, which sexual activity and intercourse are affected by the variations in physical, hormonal, and mental conditions. This study aimed to investigate the factors affecting the variations in sexual response before and during pregnancy. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on pregnant women at Rasht city (northern Iran), 2018. The data were collected using the pregnancy sexual response inventory (PSRI). Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive and inferential tests by SPSS 25 at a significance level of P<0.05. Results: The mean total score of sexual activity and response of the subjects before and during pregnancy were 73.04 ± 14.81 and 46.88 ± 16.51, respectively. The variations in the total score of sexual activity and response during pregnancy decreased by 26.16 points during pregnancy compared to before pregnancy. There was a positive correlation between the number of children and the score of the variations in sexual activity and response before and during pregnancy (r=0.143). Conclusion: Couples with a higher level of education and a lower number of children had fewer variations in their sexual response. Therefore, it is possible to enhance the couples’ sexual health through encouraging them to appropriately plan for childbearing, to share the responsibilities of taking care of their children, and to continue their education at higher levels. [GMJ.2019;8:e1531]

References

Jamali, S. and L. Mosalanejad, Sexual dysfnction in Iranian pregnant women. Iran J Reprod Med. 2013. 11(6): p. 479-486.

Johnson, C.E., Sexual health during pregnancy and the postpartum (CME). J Sex Med. 2011. 8(5): p. 1267-1284.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02223.x

PMid:21521481

Navidian, A., et al., The effect of sex education on the marital relationship quality of pregnant women. Hayat. 2016. 22(2): p. 115-127.

Sossah, L., Sexual behavior during pregnancy: a descriptive correlational study among pregnant women. Eur J Adv Res Biol Life Sci. 2014. 2(1): p. 16-27.

Ahmadi Z, et al., Sexual Satisfaction and its Related Factors in Primigravidas. IJN. 2011. 24(71): p. 54-62.

Babazadeh, R., K.M. Najmabadi, and Z. Masomi, Changes in sexual desire and activity during pregnancy among women in Shahroud, Iran. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013. 120(1): p. 82-4.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.021

PMid:23073227

Serati, M., et al., Female sexual function during pregnancy and after childbirth. J Sex Med. 2010. 7(8): p. 2782-2790.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01893.x

PMid:20626601

Demireloz Akyuz, M., et al., Sexual functions in pregnancy: different situations in near geography: a case study on Turkey, Iran and Greece. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018: p. 1-8.

AlessandRa PlácidO liMa leite, et al., Prevalence of sexual dysfunction during pregnancy. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2009. 55(5): p. 563-568.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-42302009000500020

PMid:19918657

Pauleta, J.R., N.M. Pereira, and L.M. Graca, Sexuality during pregnancy. J Sex Med. 2010. 7(1 Pt 1): p. 136-142.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01538.x

PMid:19845548

Ninivaggio, C., et al., Sexual function changes during pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017. 28(6): p. 923-929.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-016-3200-8

PMid:27889829

Galazka, I., et al., Changes in the sexual function during pregnancy. J Sex Med. 2015. 12(2): p. 445-54.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12747

PMid:25378082

Aslan, E., et al., Prevalence and risk factors for low sexual function in women: a study of 1,009 women in an outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Istanbul. J Sex Med. 2008. 5(9): p. 2044-2052.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00873.x

PMid:18564155

Aslan, G., et al., A prospective analysis of sexual functions during pregnancy. Int J Impot Res. 2005. 17(2): p. 154-157.

https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijir.3901288

PMid:15538394

Anzaku A. Stephen, et al., Evaluation of changes in sexual response and factors influencing sexuality during pregnancy among Nigerian women in Jos, Nigeria. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol.. 2016. 5(10): p. 3576-3582.

https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163448

Abouzari-Gazafroodi, K., et al., Demographic and obstetric factors affecting women's sexual functioning during pregnancy. Reprod Health. 2015. 12(1): p. 12-72.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0065-0

PMid:26285569 PMCid:PMC4541742

Rudge, C.C.V., et al., Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess sexuality in pregnant women. Reprod Health. 2009. 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-6-12

PMid:19640270 PMCid:PMC2724386

Rudge, C.V.C., et al., Score Establishment and Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pregnancy Sexual Response Inventory (PSRI). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2018. 40(6): p. 322-331.

https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1656536

PMid:29980159

Taheri-Tanjani P and A. M., Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Activities of Daily Living Scale and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale in elderly. Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016. 25(132): p. 103-112.

Plitcha SB and K. E., Munro's Statistical Methods for Health Care Research. 6th ed. 2013, Philadelphia : Wolters Kluwer Health: Lippincott Wiliams & Wikins. 14-348.

Colton, D. and R.W. Covert, Designing and constructing instruments for social research and evaluation. 2007: John Wiley & Sons.

Perron, B.E. and D.F. Gillespie, Key concepts in measurement. 2015: Pocket Guides to Social Work R.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855483.001.0001

Dilorio, C.K., Measurement in health behavior: methods for research and evaluation. Vol. 1. 2006: John Wiley & Sons.

Jawed-Wessel, S. and E. Sevick, The Impact of Pregnancy and Childbirth on Sexual Behaviors: A Systematic Review. J Sex Res. 2017: p. 1-13.

Staruch, M., et al., Sexual activity during pregnancy. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2016. 37(1): p. 53-8.

Corbacioglu Esmer, A., et al., Female sexual function and associated factors during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2013. 39(6): p. 1165-1172.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12048

PMid:23718891

Yıldız, H., The relation between prepregnancy sexuality and sexual function during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a prospective study. J Sex Marital Ther. 2015. 41(1): p. 49-59.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2013.811452

PMid:24328753

Aydin, M., et al., Comparison of Sexual Functions in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women. Urol J. 2015. 12(5): p. 2339-44.

Makara-Studzińska, M., I. Plewik, and K.M. Kryś, Sexual activity of women in different trimesters of pregnancy. EJMT, 2015. 2: p. 7.

Erol, B., et al., A cross-sectional study of female sexual function and dysfunction during pregnancy. J Sex Med. 2007. 4(5): p. 1381-1387.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00559.x

PMid:17651387

Lowenstein, L., S. Mustafa, and Y. Burke, Pregnancy and normal sexual function. Are they compatible? J Sex Med. 2013. 10(3): p. 621-622.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12098

PMid:23458213

Eryilmaz, G., E. Ege, and H. Zincir, Factors affecting sexual life during pregnancy in eastern Turkey. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2004. 57(2): p. 103-108.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000075582

PMid:14673220

Hanafy, S., N.E. Srour, and T. Mostafa, Female sexual dysfunction across the three pregnancy trimesters: an Egyptian study. Sex Health. 2014. 11(3): p. 240-243.

https://doi.org/10.1071/SH13153

PMid:24919550

Tosun Guleroglu, F. and N. Gordeles Beser, Evaluation of sexual functions of the pregnant women. J Sex Med. 2014. 11(1): p. 146-153.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12347

PMid:24165092

Basson, R., Women's sexual dysfunction: revised and expanded definitions. Cmaj. 2005. 172(10): p. 1327-1333.

https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1020174

PMid:15883409 PMCid:PMC557105

Schomerus, G., et al., Personality-related factors as predictors of help-seeking for depression: a population-based study applying the behavioral model of health services use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013. 48(11): p. 1809-1817.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-012-0643-1

PMid:23266663

Chang, S.R., et al., Comparison of overall sexual function, sexual intercourse/activity, sexual satisfaction, and sexual desire during the three trimesters of pregnancy and assessment of their determinants. J Sex Med. 2011. 8(10): p. 2859-2867.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02420.x

PMid:21812938

Corbacioglu, A., et al., The role of pregnancy awareness on female sexual function in early gestation. J Sex Med. 2012. 9(7): p. 1897-1903.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02740.x

PMid:22524554

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2019-12-29

Issue

Vol. 8 (2019): 2019

Section

Original Article

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Galen Medical Journal

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/