Investigating the Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images

Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images for Nasal Reconstruction

Authors

  • Aisan Ghaznavi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
  • Sina Ilkhani Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
  • Asma Sodaii Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
  • Mohammad Jafari Heydarlou Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

Keywords:

Nasal Morphology; Cone Beam Computed Tomography; Nasal Reconstruction; Nasal Cavity; Facial Index

Abstract

Background: Facial reconstruction is the procedure of rebuilding a face onto an anonymous skull to aid identification in forensic and archaeological cases. This study investigated the morphology of the nasal cavity for reconstruction by using cone beam computed tomography images. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, pre-treatment CBCT images of 220 adults were selected by random sampling from the records of orthodontic clinical data between January 2022 and November 2023. The three-dimensional parameters of the nasal soft structures and hard structures were measured. Results: Of 220 CBCT images, 198 cases (61.1% females and 38.9%males) were examined in the final analysis after meeting inclusion criteria. TStatistically significant sex differences were observed in nasal length (males: 50.79 ± 4.78 mm, females: 45.28 ± 4.18 mm; P < 0.05), nasal depth (males: 23.54 ± 2.43 mm, females: 26.05 ± 3.53 mm; P < 0.05), and nasal height (males: 49.81 ± 4.30 mm, females: 55.02 ± 4.49 mm; P < 0.05). The nasolabial angle was significantly higher in males (98.21° ± 8.34°) compared to females (89.71° ± 7.37°; P < 0.05). Conversely, the nasal tip angle was significantly higher in females (77.18° ± 8.45°) than in males (71.54° ± 8.20°; P < 0.05). A statistically significant difference was also observed in the nasal upward tip angle between males (23.8° ± 3.10°) and females (20.45° ± 2.98°; P < 0.05). Conclusion: This study revealed significant sex-based variations in nasal parameters. Males exhibited greater nasal length, depth, and nasal tip angle compared to females.

References

Xi J, Si XA, Malvè M. Nasal anatomy and sniffing in respiration and olfaction of wild and domestic animals. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2023 Jul 14;10:1172140.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1172140

PMid:37520001 PMCid:PMC10375297

Jankowska A, Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Grocholewicz K. Nasal Morphology and Its Correlation to Craniofacial Morphology in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):3064.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063064

PMid:33809695 PMCid:PMC8002216

Perry JL, Kollara L, Kuehn DP, Sutton BP, Fang X. Examining age, sex, and race characteristics of velopharyngeal structures in 4-to 9-year-old children using magnetic resonance imaging. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2018 Jan;55(1):21-34.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665617718549

PMid:33948051 PMCid:PMC8092075

Buzek A, Serwańska-Leja K, Zaworska-Zakrzewska A, Kasprowicz-Potocka M. The shape of the nasal cavity and adaptations to sniffing in the dog (Canis familiaris) compared to other domesticated mammals: A review article. Animals. 2022 Feb 19;12(4):517.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12040517

PMid:35203225 PMCid:PMC8868339

Stenner M, Rudack C. Diseases of the nose and paranasal sinuses in child. GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Dec 1;13:Doc10.

Losco L, Bolletta A, Pierazzi DM, Spadoni D, Cuomo R, Marcasciano M, et al. Reconstruction of the Nose: Management of Nasal Cutaneous Defects According to Aesthetic Subunit and Defect Size A Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Nov 25;56(12):639.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120639

PMid:33255524 PMCid:PMC7760386

Gupta S, Gupta V, Vij H, Vij R, Tyagi N. Forensic Facial Reconstruction: The Final Frontier. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Sep;9(9):ZE26-8.

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/14621.6568

PMid:26501035 PMCid:PMC4606364

Damas S, Cordón O, Ibáñez O, Damas S, Cordón O, Ibáñez O. Relationships between the skull and the face for forensic Craniofacial Superimposition. Handbook on Craniofacial Superimposition: The MEPROCS Project. 2020:11-50.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11137-7_3

Li J, Wu S, Mei L, Wen J, Marra J, Lei L, Li H. Facial asymmetry of the hard and soft tissues in skeletal Class I, II, and III patients. Scientific Reports. 2024 Feb 29;14(1):4966.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55107-4

PMid:38424179 PMCid:PMC10904784

Supmaneenukul Y, Khemla C, Parakonthun K. Soft tissue compensation evaluation in patients with facial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography combined with 3D facial photographs. Heliyon. 2024 Mar 30;10(6):e27720.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27720

PMid:38496872 PMCid:PMC10944279

Kaliappan A, Motwani R, Gupta T, Chandrupatla M. Innovative Cadaver Preservation Techniques: a Systematic Review. Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Mar;18(1):127-135.

https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2023.18.1.127

PMCid:PMC10231151

Thakur S, Sehrawat JS. Age and sex dependent differences in midline facial soft tissue thicknesses measured on MRI scans of Northwest Indian subjects: a forensic anthropological study. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2023 Aug 18;13(1):38.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00356-z

Wang J, Wusiman P, Mi C. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the nasal morphology among Uyghur nationality adults in Xinjiang for forensic reconstruction. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2021 Nov 1;25:100139.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2021.100139

Utsuno H, Kageyama T, Uchida K, Kibayashi K, Sakurada K, Uemura K. Pilot study to establish a nasal tip prediction method from unknown human skeletal remains for facial reconstruction and skull photo superimposition as applied to a Japanese male populations. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine. 2016 Feb 1;38:75-80.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.017

PMid:26724561

Rynn C, Wilkinson CM, Peters HL. Prediction of nasal morphology from the skull. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2010 Mar;6(1):20-34.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-009-9124-6

PMid:19924578

Bulut O, Liu CY, Gurcan S, Hekimoglu B. Prediction of nasal morphology in facial reconstruction: Validation and recalibration of the Rynn method. Legal Medicine. 2019 Sep 1;40:26-31.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2019.07.002

PMid:31326670

Aljabaa AH. Lateral cephalometric analysis of the nasal morphology among Saudi adults. Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry. 2019 Jan 15:9-17.

https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S190230

PMid:30679927 PMCid:PMC6338237

Sforza C, Rosati R, De Menezes M, Dolci C, Ferrario VF. Three-dimensional computerized anthropometry of the nose. InHandbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease 2012 Jan 12 (pp. 927-942). New York, NY: Springer New York.

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1788-1_55

Starck WJ, Epker BN. Cephalometric analysis of profile nasal esthetics Part I Method and normative data. The International Journal of Adult Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery. 1996 Jan 1;11(2):91-103.

Jahanbin A, Poosti M, Rashed R, Sharifi V, Bozorgnia Y. Evaluation of nasomaxillary growth of adolescent boys in northeastern Iran. Acta Medica Iranica. 2012:684-8.

Gruszka K, Aksoy S, Różyło-Kalinowska I, Gülbeş MM, Kalinowski P, Orhan K. A comparative study of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity anatomic variations between the Polish and Turkish Cypriot Population with CBCT. Head Face Med. 2022;18(1):1-10.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-022-00340-3

PMid:36435801 PMCid:PMC9701382

Lee WJ, Wilkinson CM, Hwang HS. An accuracy assessment of forensic computerized facial reconstruction employing cone‐beam computed tomography from live subjects. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(2):318-27.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2011.01971.x

PMid:22073932

Fernandes CMS, de Sena Pereira FDA, da Silva JVL, da Costa Serra M. Is characterizing the digital forensic facial reconstruction with hair necessary A familiar assessors' analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2013;229(1-3):164-73.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.03.036

PMid:23622792

Wilkinson C. Facial reconstruction-anatomical art or artistic anatomy? J Anat. 2010;216(2):235-50.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01182.x

PMid:20447245 PMCid:PMC2815945

Mala PZ. Pronasale position: an appraisal of two recently proposed methods for predicting nasal projection in facial reconstruction. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013 Jul;58(4):957-63.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12128

PMid:23692276

Maltais Lapointe G, Lynnerup N, Hoppa RD. Validation of the new interpretation of Gerasimov's nasal projection method for forensic facial approximation using CT data. Journal of forensic sciences. 2016 Jan;61:S193-200.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12920

PMid:26271796

Chen F, Chen Y, Yu Y, Qiang Y, Liu M, Fulton D, Chen T. Age and sex related measurement of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and nasal profile in the Chinese population. Forensic science international. 2011 Oct 10;212(1-3):272-e1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.05.027

PMid:21715112

Bromberg N, Brizuela M. Dental Cone Beam Computed Tomography. 2023 Apr 19. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-.

Suomalainen A, Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E, Robinson S. Dentomaxillofacial imaging with panoramic views and cone beam CT. Insights into imaging. 2015 Feb;6:1-6.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-014-0379-4

PMid:25575868 PMCid:PMC4330237

Sarilita E, Rynn C, Mossey PA, Black S, Oscandar F. Nose profile morphology and accuracy study of nose profile estimation method in Scottish subadult and Indonesian adult populations. International Journal of Legal Medicine. 2018 May;132:923-31.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1758-4

PMid:29260392 PMCid:PMC5919985

Ryu JY, Park KS, Kim MJ, Yun JS, Lee UY, Lee SS, Roh BY, Seo JU, Choi CU, Lee WJ. Craniofacial anthropometric investigation of relationships between the nose and nasal aperture using 3D computed tomography of Korean subjects. Sci Rep. 2020 Sep 30;10(1):16077.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73127-8

PMid:32999371 PMCid:PMC7527952

Lee KM, Lee WJ, Cho JH, Hwang HS. Three-dimensional prediction of the nose for facial reconstruction using cone-beam computed tomography. Forensic science international. 2014 Mar 1;236:194-e1.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.035

PMid:24486159

Prasad M, Chaitanya N, Reddy KPK, Talapaneni AK, Myla VB, Shetty SK. Evaluation of nasal morphology in predicting vertical and sagittal maxillary skeletal discrepancies'. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(02):197-204.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.130600

PMid:24966770 PMCid:PMC4054050

Zamani Naser A, Panahi Boroujeni M. CBCT evaluation of bony nasal pyramid dimensions in iranian population: a comparative study with ethnic groups. Int Sch Res. 2014;2014(12):25-35.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/819378

PMid:27437462 PMCid:PMC4897275

Sharma SK, Jehan M, Sharma RL, Saxena S, Trivedi A, Bhadkaria V. Anthropometric Comparison of nasal parameters between male and female of Gwalior region. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2014 May;1(5):57-62.

https://doi.org/10.9790/0853-13555762

Marini MI, Angrosidy H, Kurniawan A, Margaretha MS. The anthropological analysis of the nasal morphology of Dayak Kenyah population in Indonesia as a basic data for forensic identification. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2020 Jun 1;19:100064.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2020.100064

Scendoni R, Kelmendi J, Arrais Ribeiro IL, Cingolani M, De Micco F, Cameriere R. Anthropometric analysis of orbital and nasal parameters for sexual dimorphism: New anatomical evidences in the field of personal identification through a retrospective observational study. PLoS One. 2023 May 3;18(5):e0284219.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0284219

PMid:37134065 PMCid:PMC10155994

Khani H, Fazelinejad Z, Hanafi MG, Mahdianrad A, Moghadam AR. Morphometric and volumetric evaluations of orbit using three-dimensional computed tomography in southwestern Iranian population. Translational Research in Anatomy. 2023 Mar 1;30:100233.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tria.2023.100233

Vidya CS, Shamasundar NM, Manjunatha B, Raichurkar K. Evaluation of size and volume of maxillary sinus to determine sex by 3D computerized tomography scan method using dry skulls of South Indian origin. International Journal of Current Research and Review. 2013; 5: 97.

Nasir N, Asad MR, Muzammil K, Hassan A, Alshalwi T, Khan MR. Anthropometric study of nasal indices in four Indian Stat. Cli Pract. 2021; 18: 1620-1625.

Quinzi V, Paskay LC, D'Andrea N, Albani A, Monaco A, Saccomanno S. Evaluation of the nasolabial angle in orthodontic diagnosis: a systematic review. Applied Sciences. 2021 Mar 12;11(6):2531.

https://doi.org/10.3390/app11062531

Rho NK, Park JY, Youn CS, Lee SK, Kim HS. Early changes in facial profile following structured filler rhinoplasty: an anthropometric analysis using a 3-dimensional imaging system. Dermatologic Surgery. 2017 Feb 1;43(2):255-63.

https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000972

PMid:28099202

Kandhasamy K, Prabu NM, Sivanmalai S, Prabu PS, Philip A, Chiramel JC. Evaluation of the nasolabial angle of the Komarapalayam population. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012 Aug;4(Suppl 2):S313-5.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.100284

PMid:23066279 PMCid:PMC3467935

Shah R, Frank-Ito DO. The role of normal nasal morphological variations from race and gender differences on respiratory physiology. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2022 Mar;297:103823.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2021.103823

PMid:34883314 PMCid:PMC9258636

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Ghaznavi , A., Ilkhani, S., Sodaii, A., & Jafari Heydarlou, M. (2024). Investigating the Morphology of the Nasal Cavity for Nasal Reconstruction Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images : Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images for Nasal Reconstruction . Galen Medical Journal, 13(SP1), e3522. Retrieved from https://journals.salviapub.com/index.php/gmj/article/view/3522