Optimal Timing for Elective Cesarean Deliveries: Insights from a Comparative Study at 38- or 39-Weeks Gestation

Authors

  • Shaghayegh Moradi Alamdarloo Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Fariba Hoseini Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Atefe Hashemi Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Homeira Vafaei Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Maryam Zolghadr Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  • Hamide Barzegar Neonatal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Keywords:

Cesarean Section; Pregnancy; Elective Surgical Procedures; Pregnancy Outcome; Maternal Health

Abstract

Background: The optimal timing for elective cesarean deliveries remains a subject of debate, with concerns regarding consequences for mother and child at different gestational ages. Materials and Methods: This prospective cohort study was done in 2022 at hospitals associated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Singleton pregnant women whose pregnancies were terminated at 38(38+0 to 38+6) or 39 (39+0 to 39+6) weeks gestation were enrolled. Data on demographic characteristics, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and complications were collected from hospital records. The maternal and neonatal pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups using SPSS version 21. T-test, Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were performed. Results: Among 1812 cesarean deliveries, 1274 (70.3%) were performed at 38 weeks gestational age and 538 (29.7%) at 39 weeks gestational age. Maternal complications, including infection at the surgical site (1.6% vs 0.4%, P=0.03) and uterine rupture( 0.6% vs 0, P=0.04), were more prevalent in the 38-week group. Growth indices were higher in neonates born at 39 weeks (length 49.55±2.36 vs 48.71±2.05 cm P=0.001 & weight 3.57±0.67 vs 3.37±0.59 kg P=0.001). No significant differences were observed in other maternal or neonatal complications between the two groups. Conclusion: Deliveries at 38 weeks were associated with a higher rate of maternal complications, possibly due to their emergent nature. However, there were no significant differences in most maternal and neonatal outcomes. Elective cesarean at 38 weeks may still be reasonable to avoid emergency operations and their risks.

References

Ye J, Betrán AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014;41(3):23744.

https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12104

PMid:24720614

Organization WH. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:4367.

TorkZahrani S. Commentary: childbirth education in Iran. The Journal of perinatal education. 2008;17(3):514.

https://doi.org/10.1624/105812408X329601

PMid:19436412 PMCid:PMC2517184

Bani S, Seied Rasooli A, Shamsi Ghoreishi T, Ghojazadeh M, Hasanpoor Sh. Delivery agents preferences regarding mode of delivery for themselves and pregnant women. Nurs Midwifery J. 2010;5(18):4048.

Shareferad G, Fathean Z, Terane M, Mahake B. The Survey of pregnant women views about delivery and cesarean according behavioral intention model. IlamUni Med SciJ. 2007;15:1923.

Kyu HH, Shannon HS, Georgiades K, Boyle MH. Caesarean delivery and neonatal mortality rates in 46 lowand middleincome countries: a propensityscore matching and metaanalysis of demographic and health survey data. International journal of epidemiology. 2013;42(3):78191.

https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyt081

PMid:23778573

Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Carroli G, Fawole B et al. Caesarean section without medical indications is associated with an increased risk of adverse shortterm maternal outcomes: the 20042008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. BMC medicine. 2010;8:110.

https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-8-71

PMid:21067593 PMCid:PMC2993644

Metwali NY, Ahmed RA, Timraz JH, Irfan H, Makarfi SM, Metwali MY et al. EvidenceBased Strategies to Minimize Unnecessary Primary Cesarean Sections: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2024;16(11): e74729.

https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74729

PMid:39735004 PMCid:PMC11682606

Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 19902014. PloS one. 2016;11(2):e0148343.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148343

PMid:26849801 PMCid:PMC4743929

Hu Y, Shen H, Landon MB, Cheng W, Liu X. Optimal timing for elective caesarean delivery in a Chinese population: a large hospitalbased retrospective cohort study in Shanghai. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e014659.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014659

PMid:28600366 PMCid:PMC5623362

Caesarean birth NICE guideline. [NG192]. [database on the Internet]: 2024; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192. Accessed:

Birth after Previous Caesarean Birth. (Greentop Guideline No 45). [database on the Internet]: 2015; Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/guidance/browseallguidance/greentopguidelines/

Obstetricians ACo, Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 765: avoidance of nonmedically indicated early-term deliveries and associated neonatal morbidities. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e156-e63.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003076

PMid:30681546

Prediger B, Mathes T, Polus S, Glatt A, Bühn S, Schiermeier S et al. A systematic review and timeresponse metaanalysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20:118.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03036-1

PMid:32641019 PMCid:PMC7341650

Yang XJ, Sun SS. Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2017;296(3):50312.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4445-2

PMid:28681107

Savukyne E, BykovaiteStankeviciene R, Machtejeviene E, Nadisauskiene R, Maciuleviciene R. Symptomatic Uterine Rupture: A Fifteen Year Review. Medicina. 2020;56(11):574.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56110574

PMid:33138157 PMCid:PMC7693983

Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Varner MW et al. Risk of Uterine Rupture and Adverse Perinatal Outcome at Term After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;110(4):8017.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2

PMid:17906012

Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, Mol BWJ, van der Post JA, Papatsonis DN. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(3):250.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.052

PMid:20207243

Vidic Z, Blickstein I, Štucin Gantar I, Verdenik I, Tul N. Timing of elective cesarean section and neonatal morbidity: a populationbased study. The Journal of MaternalFetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(15):24602.

https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1087500

PMid:26444222

Hefny SM, Hashem AMT, AbdelRazek ARA, Ayad SM. The neonatal respiratory outcome in relation to timing of elective cesarean section at 38 versus 39 week gestation: A single center based study. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette. 2013;61(2):7882.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epag.2013.06.001

Glavind J, Kindberg S, Uldbjerg N, Khalil M, Møller A, Mortensen B et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2013;120(9):112332.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12278

PMid:23682628

Pirjani R, Afrakhteh M, Sepidarkish M, Nariman S, Shirazi M, Moini A et al. 'Elective caesarean section at 38-39 weeks gestation compared to> 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):15.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1785-2

PMid:29739452 PMCid:PMC5941590

birthafterpreviouscaesareanbirthgreentopguidelineno45/. Accessed:

Obstetricians ACo. ACOG committee opinion no 765: avoidance of nonmedically indicated earlyterm deliveries and associated neonatal morbidities. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):e156e63.

https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003076

PMid:30681546

Prediger B, Mathes T, Polus S, Glatt A, Bühn S, Schiermeier S et al. A systematic review and timeresponse metaanalysis of the optimal timing of elective caesarean sections for best maternal and neonatal health outcomes. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2020;20:118.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-03036-1

PMid:32641019 PMCid:PMC7341650

Yang XJ, Sun SS. Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2017;296(3):50312.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4445-2

PMid:28681107

Savukyne E, BykovaiteStankeviciene R, Machtejeviene E, Nadisauskiene R, Maciuleviciene R. Symptomatic Uterine Rupture: A Fifteen Year Review. Medicina. 2020;56(11):574.

https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56110574

PMid:33138157 PMCid:PMC7693983

Spong CY, Landon MB, Gilbert S, Rouse DJ, Leveno KJ, Varner MW et al. Risk of Uterine Rupture and Adverse Perinatal Outcome at Term After Cesarean Delivery. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2007;110(4):8017.

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000284622.71222.b2

PMid:17906012

Wilmink FA, Hukkelhoven CW, Lunshof S, Mol BWJ, van der Post JA, Papatsonis DN. Neonatal outcome following elective cesarean section beyond 37 weeks of gestation: a 7year retrospective analysis of a national registry. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 2010;202(3):250.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.01.052

PMid:20207243

Vidic Z, Blickstein I, Štucin Gantar I, Verdenik I, Tul N. Timing of elective cesarean section and neonatal morbidity: a populationbased study. The Journal of MaternalFetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2016;29(15):24602.

https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1087500

PMid:26444222

Hefny SM, Hashem AMT, AbdelRazek ARA, Ayad SM. The neonatal respiratory outcome in relation to timing of elective cesarean section at 38 versus 39 week gestation: A single center based study. Egyptian Pediatric Association Gazette. 2013;61(2):7882.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epag.2013.06.001

Glavind J, Kindberg S, Uldbjerg N, Khalil M, Møller A, Mortensen B et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2013;120(9):112332.

https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12278

PMid:23682628

Pirjani R, Afrakhteh M, Sepidarkish M, Nariman S, Shirazi M, Moini A et al. 'Elective caesarean section at 38-39 weeks gestation compared to> 39 weeks on neonatal outcomes: a prospective cohort study. BMC pregnancy and childbirth. 2018;18(1):15.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-018-1785-2

PMid:29739452 PMCid:PMC5941590

Downloads

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Moradi Alamdarloo, S., Hoseini, F., Hashemi, A., Vafaei, H., Zolghadr, M., & Barzegar, H. (2025). Optimal Timing for Elective Cesarean Deliveries: Insights from a Comparative Study at 38- or 39-Weeks Gestation. Galen Medical Journal, 14, e3839. Retrieved from https://journals.salviapub.com/index.php/gmj/article/view/3839

Issue

Section

Original Article