Laboratory Investigation of the Effect of Three Decontamination Methods on Surface Alterations of Dental Implants
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.vi.3864Keywords:
Dental Implants; Scanning Electron Microscope; Implant Surface RoughnessAbstract
Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of three decontamination methods on the surface alterations of dental implants and the removal of bacterial plaque from their surfaces. Materials and Methods: In this experimental in vitro study, 24 titanium cylinders with sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaces were contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus to simulate biofilm formation. Samples were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 6): titanium curette, diode laser, titanium brush, and saline flush control. Surface roughness (Ra and Rz) was measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) before and after cleaning. Colony-forming units (CFUs) were quantified post-treatment to assess bacterial removal. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis tests, Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons, and one-way ANOVA with post hoc LSD tests (α = 0.05). Results: Surface roughness differed significantly among groups after cleaning (Ra, p = .002; Rz, p = .002). Titanium curette and titanium brush produced smoother surfaces than diode laser and control, with the curette achieving the greatest reduction in roughness. CFU analysis revealed significant differences among groups (F = 3.26, p = .043). Contrary to expectations, the saline flush control showed the lowest CFU counts, whereas titanium curette and titanium brush exhibited higher bacterial counts than control (p < .05), and diode laser did not differ significantly from control (p = .151). Conclusion: The titanium curette and titanium brush caused the samples' most significant surface roughness changes. However, the effectiveness of these methods for bacterial plaque removal was lower than that of the control group and the Diode laser group.
References
Myshin HL, Wiens JP. Factors affecting soft tissue around dental implants : a review of the literature. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2005 Nov 1 ; 94 (5) : 440 444.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.08.021
PMid:16275304
Fazel A, Aalai S, Rismanchian M, Sadr‐Eshkevari P. Micromotion and stress distribution of immediate loaded implants : a finite element analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2009 Dec ; 11 (4) : 267 271.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00121.x
PMid:18783413
Misch CE. " Rationale for dental implants " Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Mosby, St. Louis, Missouri: pp 3 - 25 ; 2008.
Gehrke SA, Boligon J, Shibli JA. Evaluation of the cleaning and alterations in titanium surfaces with different mechanical instruments using an artificial calculus. Oral Health and Dental Management. 2014 ; 13 : 1029 1033.
Lin C, Dong QS, Wang L, Zhang JR, Wu LA, Liu BL. Dental implants with the periodontium : a new approach for the restoration of missing teeth. Medical Hypotheses. 2009 ; 72 (1) : 58 61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mehy.2008.08.018
PMid:18829177
Lemmerman KJ, Lemmerman NE. Osseointegrated dental implants in private practice : a longterm case series study. Journal of Periodontology. 2005 ; 76 (2) : 310 319.
https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.310
PMid:15974858
Barboza EP, Caula AL, Carvalho WR. Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants : a radiographic and microbiological descriptive study. Implant Dentistry. 2002 ; 11 (2) : 162 169.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200204000-00018
PMid:12078599
Matarasso S, Quaremba G, Coraggio F, Vaia E, Cafiero C, Lang NP. Maintenance of implants : an in vitro study of titanium implant surface modifications subsequent to the application of different prophylaxis procedures. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 1996 ; 7 (1) : 64 72.
https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070108.x
PMid:9002824
Hultin M, Komiyama A, Klinge B. Supportive therapy and the longevity of dental implants : a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2007 ; 18 Suppl 3 : 50 62.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01447.x
PMid:17594370
Weber HP, Cochran DL. The soft tissue response to osseointegrated dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1998 ; 79 (1) : 79 89.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70198-2
PMid:9474546
Newman M, Takei H, Carranza F. Carranza's Clinical periodontology. 9th ed. Philadelphia : W.B. Saunders Co ; 2002.
Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of interventions to treat periimplantitis : a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. European Journal of Oral Implantology. 2008 ; 1 (2) : 111 125.
Espedito Di Lauro A, Morgese F, Squillace A, Ramaglia L. In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of periimplantitis. Minerva Stomatologica. 2003 ; 52 (1 2) : 1 7.
Matsubara VH, Leong BW, Leong MJ, Lawrence Z, Becker T, Quaranta A. Cleaning potential of different air abrasive powders and their impact on implant surface roughness. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. 2020 Feb ; 22 (1) : 96 104.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12875
PMid:31837107
Al‐Hashedi AA, Laurenti M, Benhamou V, Tamimi F. Decontamination of titanium implants using physical methods. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2017 Aug ; 28 (8) : 1013 1021.
https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12914
PMid:27392811
Lollobrigida M, Fortunato L, Serafini G, Mazzucchi G, Bozzuto G, Molinari A, et al. The prevention of implant surface alterations in the treatment of periimplantitis : comparison of three different mechanical and physical treatments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17: 2624.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082624
PMid:32290450 PMCid:PMC7215863
Bennani V, Hwang L, TawseSmith A, Dias GJ, Cannon RD. Effect of airpolishing on titanium surfaces, biofilm removal, and biocompatibility : a pilot study. BioMed Research International. 2015 Dec 31 ; 2015(1):491047.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/491047
PMid:26881198 PMCid:PMC4735983
Nee WY, Awang RA, Hassan A. Effects on the titanium implant surface by different hygiene instrumentations : a narrative review. Cureus. 2022 Oct ; 14 (10): eXXXXX.
Hakki SS, Tatar G, Dundar N, Demiralp B. The effect of different cleaning methods on the surface and temperature of failed titanium implants : an in vitro study. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017 Apr ; 32 : 563 571.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2149-2
PMid:28160204
Kushima SS, Nagasawa M, Shibli JA, Brugnera Jr A, Rodrigues JA, Cassoni A. Evaluation of temperature and roughness alteration of diode laser irradiation of zirconia and titanium for periimplantitis treatment. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery. 2016 May ; 34 (5) : 194 199.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.4026
PMid:27058359
Bollenl CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention : a review of the literature. Dental materials. 1997 Jul 1 ; 13 (4) : 258 269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80038-3
PMid:11696906
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galen Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





