Investigating the Proximity of the Lower Alveolar Canal to the Apex of Premolar and Molar Teeth in the Mandible Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Tabriz, Iran

Authors

  • Shahriar Shahi 1-Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran /2-Dental and Periodontal Research Center,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Shirin Kolahdouz School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • Sahar Ghanbaran Department of Endodontics School of Dentistry, Shiraz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz, Iran
  • Mohammad Gerayeli Private Practice, Periodontist Lux Smile Dental Clinic, Mashhad, Iran
  • Emad Movahed School of Dentistry, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • Mohammad Ali Irani Doctor Irani Clinic and Research Center, Tehran, Iran
  • Shaghayegh Ghadimi Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry,Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.vi.3936

Keywords:

Alveolar Canal; Mandible; Molar Teeth; Premolar Teeth; Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Abstract

Background: Knowing the anatomical link between the IAN and surrounding structures is vital before endodontic operations to avoid injuring the IAN. Examining the relationship between the inferior alveolar canal (IAC) and the apices of mandibular premolars and molars using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is the primary objective of this work. Materials and Methods: Two hundred and twenty patients, ranging in age from sixteen to seventy-seven, who visited the University of Tabriz’s Faculty of Dentistry had their CBCT images examined in this retrospective cohort study. Mandibular fractures, pathologies, or bone syndromes were not considered, as were teeth with diseases impacting canal contact. Additionally, poorly defined IAN pictures were not included. The shortest distance between the root apex and the upper border of the interosseous capsule was determined by taking measurements using cross-sections that were 0.3 mm thick. Results: Analysis of 220 CBCT images revealed a gender distribution of 56.8% female and 43.2% male patients, with age groups of 49 years (32.3%). The greatest mean distance between the teeth and the IAC was observed in the first premolar in males (5.7 mm), while the shortest was in the third molar in females (2.91 mm). Distances from mandibular molars and premolars to the IAC showed significant differences: second and first molars had smaller distal than mesial distances (P<0.05), and second premolars had greater distances on the right side (P<0.001). Males exhibited greater distances than females for molars and premolars (P<0.05), but age had no significant impact (P>0.05). Conclusion: Mandibular premolars maintain the most significant distance, while the third molar is closest to the IAC. Gender differences are significant, while age does not impact these measurements.

References

Roy TS, Sarkar AK, Panicker HK. Variation in the origin of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clinical Anatomy: The Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. 2002 Mar;15(2):1437.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.1110

PMid:11877794

Chong BS, Gohil K, Pawar R, Makdissi J. Anatomical relationship between mental foramen, mandibular teeth and risk of nerve injury with endodontic treatment. Clinical oral investigations. 2017 Jan;21(1):3817.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1801-8

PMid:27020909

Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a literature review. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2011 Apr 1;2(1):e1.

https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2011.2101

PMid:24421983 PMCid:PMC3886063

Lin MH, Mau LP, Cochran DL, Shieh YS, Huang PH, Huang RY. Risk assessment of inferior alveolar nerve injury for immediate implant placement in the posterior mandible: a virtual implant placement study. Journal of dentistry. 2014 Mar 1;42(3):26370.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.12.014

PMid:24394585

Ali AS, Benton JA, Yates JM. Risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury with coronectomy vs surgical extraction of mandibular third molars-A comparison of two techniques and review of the literature. Journal of oral rehabilitation. 2018 Mar;45(3):2507.

https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12589

PMid:29171914

Juodzbalys G, Wang HL, Sabalys G. Injury of the inferior alveolar nerve during implant placement: a literature review. Journal of oral & maxillofacial research. 2011 Apr 1;2(1):e1.

https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2011.2101

PMid:24421983 PMCid:PMC3886063

Mahmood H, Hoare J, Atkins S. Chemical neurotoxicity to the inferior alveolar nerve-A rare sequela of endodontic treatment. Oral Surgery. 2022 Nov;15(4):6638.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12741

Iwata K, Imai T, Tsuboi Y, Tashiro A, Ogawa A, Morimoto T, Masuda Y, Tachibana Y, Hu J. Alteration of medullary dorsal horn neuronal activity following inferior alveolar nerve transection in rats. Journal of neurophysiology. 2001 Dec 1;86(6):286877.

https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.6.2868

PMid:11731543

Hillerup S. Iatrogenic injury to the inferior alveolar nerve: etiology, signs and symptoms, and observations on recovery. International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery. 2008 Aug 1;37(8):7049.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.04.002

PMid:18501561

Weckx A, Agbaje JO, Sun Y, Jacobs R, Politis C. Visualization techniques of the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN): a narrative review. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2016 Jan;38(1):5563.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1510-z

PMid:26163825 PMCid:PMC4744261

Vidya KC, Pathi J, Rout S, Sethi A, Sangamesh NC. Inferior alveolar nerve canal position in relation to mandibular molars: a conebeam computed tomography study. National Journal of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2019 Jul 1;10(2):16874.

https://doi.org/10.4103/njms.NJMS_53_17

PMid:31798251 PMCid:PMC6883893

Hiremath H, Agarwal R, Hiremath V, Phulambrikar T. Evaluation of proximity of mandibular molars and second premolar to inferior alveolar nerve canal among central Indians: A conebeam computed tomographic retrospective study. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2016 May 1;27(3):3126.

https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-9290.186240

PMid:27411662

Dabbaghi A, Shams N,Yousefimanesh H, Robati M, Shams B,Salehi P, et al. Evaluation of Mental Foramen Position to First and Second Premolar and First MolarTeeth in Cone Beam Computed Tomography(CBCT). Jundishapur Sci Med J. 2014; Suppl:3745.

Adigüzel O, YiğitÖzer S, Kaya S, Akkuş Z. Patientspecific factors in the proximity of the inferior alveolar nerve to the tooth apex. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012; 17(6): e1103-e1108.

https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.18190

PMid:22926478 PMCid:PMC3505709

Portaji B, Salehi Fard N, Portaji M. Correlation of panoramic radiography and CBCT findings in evaluating the relationship between impacted mandibular third molar and inferior alveolar canal. Qazvin Univ Med Sci J. 2017 JunJul;(91):2.

Ozturk A, Potluri A, Vieira AR. Position and course of the mandibular canal in skulls. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012; 113(4): 453458.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.038

PMid:22676925

Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34(1): 5558.

https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/23146121

PMid:15709108

Rytkönen K , Ventä I. Distance between mandibular canal and third molar root among 20yearold subjects. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Sep;22(7):25052509.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2346-9

PMid:29372444

Simonton J.D, Azevedo B, Schindler W, Hargreaves K.M, Ageand genderrelated differences in the position of the inferior alveolar nerve by using cone beam computed tomography. J. Endod, 2009. 35(7): p. 944949.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.032

PMid:19567312

Tafakhori Z, Karimi M. Evaluation of Horizontal Position of Mental Foramen in Relation to Mandibular Premolar in the Panoramic Radiograph in Rafsanjan City in 2014. J RafsanjanUniv Med Sci. 2016; 14(11): 913.

Angel JS ,Mincer HH, Chaudhry J , Scarbecz MS. Cone‐beam Computed Tomography for Analyzing Variations in Inferior Alveolar Canal Location in Adults in Relation to Age and Sex, J. Forensic Sci. 2011;56(1): 216219.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01508.x

PMid:20666920

Ishak MH, Zhun OC, Shaari R, Rahman SA, Hasan MN, Alam MK. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone beam computed tomography. Mymensingh Med J. 2014;23(4): 7816.

Kim THS, Caruso JM, Christensen H, Torabinejad M. A comparison of conebeam computed tomography and direct measurement in the examination of the mandibular canal and adjacent structures. J Endod. 2010 Jul;36(7):11914.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.03.028

PMid:20630297

Ghaeminia H , Meijer GJ , Soehardi A , Borstlap WA , Mulder J , Vlijmen OJC , et al. The use of cone beam CT for the removal of wisdom teeth changes the surgical approach compared with panoramic radiography: a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 40(8): 834-9.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2011.02.032

PMid:21507612

Downloads

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

Shahi, S., Kolahdouz, S., Ghanbaran, S., Gerayeli, M., Movahed, E., Irani, M. A., & Ghadimi, S. (2025). Investigating the Proximity of the Lower Alveolar Canal to the Apex of Premolar and Molar Teeth in the Mandible Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in Tabriz, Iran. Galen Medical Journal, e3936. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.vi.3936

Issue

Section

Original Article