Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Two Bonding Systems on the Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: An In Vitro Study
Keywords:
Bracket Adhesion; Enamel Conditioning; Orthodontic Bracket; Shear Bond Strength; Self-Etch AdhesiveAbstract
Background: Reliable bracket attachment is crucial for successful orthodontic treatment. Traditional bonding techniques utilize phosphoric acid to etch enamel by creating micromechanical retention, though this method can be technique-sensitive and time-consuming. Self-etch adhesives have been introduced to streamline this process by combining etching and priming into a single step. In this study we aimed at evaluating Transbond™ XT and Absolute2 bounding properties. Materials and Method: A total of sixteen premolars extracted recently were randomly allocated into two groups, each containing eight teeth. Metal brackets were bonded onto these teeth using either the etch-and-rinse adhesive Transbond™ XT or the self-etch adhesive Absolute2, according to the manufacturer's guidelines. Following the bonding procedure, the specimens were immersed in water for 24 hours, then subjected to 1,000 thermal cycles between temperatures of 5°C and 55°C. Finally, shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. Results: The mean Shear Bond Strength for Transbond™ XT was 16.03 ± 2.54 MPa, significantly higher than 0.14 ± 0.40 MPa for Absolute2 (P = 0.001). Most samples in the Absolute2 group failed before or after thermocycling, indicating insufficient bonding performance. Conclusion: The self-etch adhesive Absolute2 demonstrated inadequate bond strength to untreated enamel for orthodontic bracket bonding. Although self-etch adhesives simplify the procedure, enamel surface preparation or improved adhesive formulations are necessary for clinically reliable adhesion. Future studies should explore novel enamel conditioning methods and hydrolytically stable adhesives to enhance bonding durability.
References
Gange P. The evolution of bonding in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2015;147(4, Supplement):S56S63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.011
PMid:25836345
Ghaleb L, AlWorafi NA, Thawaba A, Abdulqader AA, Alkamel A, Abdo Y et al. Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):358.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04138-4
PMid:38509532 PMCid:PMC10953161
Dos Santos AL, Wambier LM, Wambier DS, Moreira KM, Imparato JC, Chibinski AC. Orthodontic bracket bonding techniques and adhesion failures: A systematic review and metaanalysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2022;14(9):e746e55.
https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.59768
PMid:36158772 PMCid:PMC9498638
Khan H, Mheissen S, Iqbal A, Jafri AR, Alam MK. Bracket Failure in Orthodontic Patients: The Incidence and the Influence of Different Factors. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:5128870.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5128870
PMid:35059463 PMCid:PMC8766193
Ramsundar K, Jain RK, Balakrishnan N, Vikramsimha B. Comparative evaluation of bracket bond failure rates of a novel nonprimer adhesive with a conventional primerbased orthodontic adhesive a pilot study. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2023;17(1):359.
https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2023.36953
PMid:37650021 PMCid:PMC10462921
Bukhari K, Alaydaa R, Alhazmi R, Alharbi A, Alahmadi O, Zafar M et al. Comparative analysis of shear bond strength and debonding characteristics of bioactive versus conventional orthodontic adhesives: An invitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2025;37(13):3.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00002-5
PMid:40397265 PMCid:PMC12133651
Haralur SB, Alqahtani AM, Shiban AS, Alattaf ZM, Chaturvedi S, AlQahtani SM et al. Influence of different surface treatment on bonding of metal and ceramic Orthodontic Brackets to CADCAM all ceramic materials. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):564.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03246-x
PMid:37574557 PMCid:PMC10423419
Abuelenain DA, Linjawi AI, Alghamdi AS, Alsadi FM. The effect of various mechanical and chemical surface conditioning on the bonding of orthodontic brackets to all ceramic materials. Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021;16(1):3704.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2020.02.003
PMid:33384822 PMCid:PMC7770247
Kerayechian N, Bardideh E, Bayani S. Comparison of selfetch primers with conventional acidetch technique for bonding brackets in orthodontics: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Eur J Orthod. 2022;44(4):38595.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab076
PMid:35022707
Shayan AM, Behroozian A, Sadrhaghighi A, Dolatabadi A, Hashemzadeh S. Effect of different types of acidetching agents and adhesives on enamel discoloration during orthodontic treatment. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2021;15(1):710.
https://doi.org/10.34172/joddd.2021.002
PMid:33927834 PMCid:PMC8058157
Bilal R. An in vitro study to compare the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to permanent teeth by using conventional acidetching and selfetching primers. Dental Hypotheses. 2021;12(3):15560.
https://doi.org/10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_41_21
Pavithra Devi S, Barthunia N, Jain R, Selvaraj MK, Arvindyogeshwar R, Chandran A. An In Vitro Study to Compare the Shear Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets Using Conventional Acid Etch and SelfEtch Primer. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(Suppl 2):S1373s7.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_386_23
PMid:38882726 PMCid:PMC11174325
Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G. Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma). 2017;8(1):117.
https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001
PMid:28736601 PMCid:PMC5507161
Saikaew P, Sattabanasuk V, Harnirattisai C, Chowdhury A, Carvalho R, Sano H. Role of the smear layer in adhesive dentistry and the clinical applications to improve bonding performance. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2022;58:5966.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdsr.2021.12.001
PMid:35140823 PMCid:PMC8814382
Ozer F, Blatz MB. Selfetch and etchandrinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(1):124.
Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA, Vermelho PM, Fronza BM, Nikaido T et al. Selfetch adhesive systems: a literature review. Brazilian dental journal. 2015;26:310.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201302442
PMid:25672377
Naranjo J, Ali M, Belles D. Comparison of shear bond strength of selfetch and selfadhesive cements bonded to lithium disilicate, enamel and dentin. Tex Dent J. 2015;132(11):91421.
Ousehal L, El Aouame A, Rachdy Z, Benkiran G. Comparison of the efficacy of a conventional primer and a selfetching primer. Int Orthod. 2016;14(2):195205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2016.03.005
PMid:27080598
Raji SH, Ghorbanipour R, Majdzade F. Effect of clearfil protect bond and transbond plus selfetch primer on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011;8(Suppl 1):S949.
Knaup I, Weber E, Böddeker A, Tempel K, Rückbeil MV, Bartz JR et al. Effect of using different component combinations for orthodontic bracket bonding with selfetch primers. J Orofac Orthop. 2023;84(Suppl 2):8492.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-021-00356-5
PMid:34581835
Pulido MBP, Pereira PM, Pitschielller R, Proença L, Bugaighis I. Comparison of shear bond strength of metallic brackets bonded to ceramic surfaces utilizing different adhesive systems: An in vitro study. J Orthod Sci. 2023;12:73.
https://doi.org/10.4103/jos.jos_12_23
PMid:38234642 PMCid:PMC10793850
Marques Ferreira de Sena L, Monielle Duarte Moura D, Helena Gurgel de Carvalho I, de Fatima Dantas de Almeida L, Ramos da Silva N, Othávio de Assunção ESR. Bond strength, degree of conversion, and microorganism adhesion using different brackettoenamel bonding protocols. J Orofac Orthop. 2023;84(Suppl 3):21021.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-022-00430-6
PMid:36251054
Feagin K, Kwon SJ, Farheen F, Vlachos C, Lawson NC, Lamani E. In vitro comparison of wear of three orthodontic bite materials and opposing enamel. Int Orthod. 2021;19(3):4949.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.06.002
PMid:34217641
House K, Ireland AJ, Sherriff M. An invitro investigation into the use of a single component selfetching primer adhesive system for orthodontic bonding: a pilot study. J Orthod. 2006;33(2):11624.
https://doi.org/10.1179/146531205225021501
PMid:16751433
Pasquale A, Weinstein M, Borislow AJ, Braitman LE. Invivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 selfetching primer/adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(5):6714.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.008
PMid:18005842
Jazi L, Sodagar A, Kazemi SS, Mirhashemi A. Evaluation and comparison of the effect of incorporating zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the bond strength and microleakage of two orthodontic fixed retainer adhesives. J World Fed Orthod. 2023;12(1):228.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.09.002
PMid:36456427
Sfondrini MF, Gatti S, Scribante A. Shear bond strength of selfligating brackets. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(1):714.
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq041
PMid:20660129
Armstrong D, Shen G, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA. Excess adhesive flash upon bracket placement A typodont study comparing APC PLUS and Transbond XT. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):11018.
https://doi.org/10.2319/081506-334.1
PMid:18004914
AlSamak S, Alsaleem NR, Ahmed MK. Evaluation of the shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index of color change, fluorescent, and conventional orthodontic adhesives: An in vitro study. Int Orthod. 2023;21(1):100712.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100712
PMid:36493626
Silva AL, de Godoi APT, Facury AGBF, Neves JG, Correr AB, CorrerSobrinho L et al. Comparison of the shear bond strength between metal brackets and Transbond™ XT, Filtek™ Z250 and Filtek™ Z350 before and after gastroesophageal reflux: An in vitro study. International Orthodontics. 2022;20(3):100664.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2022.100664
PMid:35871154
Naseh R, Jafarian S, Mortazavi M, Fallahzadeh F. Comparing the effect of assure plus and transbond XT bonding on shear bond strength and adhesive remnant index in metal brackets bonded to enamel. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. 2021;31(199):12130.
Bahrami S, Azarbayejani S, Kazemian M. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and debonding properties of GC Ortho Connect composite and Transbond XT composite. Australasian Orthodontic Journal. 2023;39(1):3541.
https://doi.org/10.2478/aoj-2023-0004
Davari A, Danesh Kazemi A, Piri Ardakani M. Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets with three types of ideal composites: Mako, Heliomolar, and Z250. Journal of Dental School. 2006;24(2):1949.
Mobarak E, ElBadrawy W, Pashley D, Jamjoom H. Effect of pretest storage conditions of extracted teeth on their dentin bond strengths. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2010;104:927.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60098-4
PMid:20654765
Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent. 2014;17(4):30511.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.136340
PMid:25125840 PMCid:PMC4127686
Scribante A, ContrerasBulnes R, Montasser MA, Vallittu PK. Orthodontics: Bracket Materials, Adhesives Systems, and Their Bond Strength. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1329814.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1329814
PMid:27818996 PMCid:PMC5081464
Sato T, Takagaki T, Hatayama T, Nikaido T, Tagami J. Update on enamel bonding strategies. Frontiers in Dental Medicine. 2021;2:666379.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fdmed.2021.666379
Santin DC, de Souza ID, Rodrigues ACC, Costa MP, da Silva TKC, Giacomini MC et al. Effectiveness of selfetching bonding systems on dentin after radiotherapy: perspectives on microtensile and microshear bond strength. Clin Oral Investig. 2024;28(11):611.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05994-8
PMid:39453555
Bergem M. The effect of brushing. acid etching and fluoride dentifrice: on the surface of human enamel; 2014.
Tran XV, Tran KQ. Microleakage and characteristics of resintooth tissues interface of a selfetch and an etchandrinse adhesive systems. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2021;46(2): e30.
https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2021.46.e30
PMid:34123766 PMCid:PMC8170381
Hoshika S, Kameyama A, Suyama Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B. GPDM and 10MDPbased Selfetch Adhesives Bonded to Burcut and Uncut Enamel "Immediate" and "Aged" µTBS. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):11320.
Moura SK, Reis A, Pelizzaro A, DalBianco K, Loguercio AD, AranaChavez VE et al. Bond strength and morphology of enamel using selfetching adhesive systems with different acidities. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(4):31525.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000400009
PMid:19668991 PMCid:PMC4327648
Falcione D, Pena C, Turssi C, França F, Amaral Fd, Tagami J et al. Influence of Application Modes on Increasing Bond Strength Longevity of Selfetching and Universal Adhesive Systems to Enamel. Operative Dentistry. 2024;49(1):5264.
https://doi.org/10.2341/22-133-L
PMid:38019213
Kadhim HA, Deb S, Ibrahim AI. Performance of novel enamelconditioning calciumphosphate pastes for orthodontic bonding: An in vitro study. J Clin Exp Dent. 2023;15(2):e102e9.
Foly JCSdN, Weissheimer M, Gaspar CF, Fehrenbach J, Miotti LL, Piva E et al. Bonding performance of universal adhesive systems to enamel - Effects of the acidic composition. Dental Materials. 2025;41(3):27282.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.12.011
PMid:39734140
Teixeira GS, Pereira GKR, Susin AH. Aging MethodsAn Evaluation of Their Influence on Bond Strength. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(3):44853.
https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721906
PMid:33511603 PMCid:PMC8382447
De Abreu Neto HF, Costa AR, Correr AB, Vedovello SA, Valdrighi HC, Santos EC et al. Influence of Light Source, Thermocycling and Silane on the Shear Bond Strength of Metallic Brackets to Ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(6):6858.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201300416
PMid:26963217
Lopes GV, CorrerSobrinho L, Correr AB, Godoi APT, Vedovello SAS, Menezes CC. Light Activation and Thermocycling Methods on the Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Bonded to Porcelain Surfaces. Braz Dent J. 2020;31(1):526.
https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202003101
PMid:32159706
Tichý A, Yang Y, Sayed M, Shimada Y, Hosaka K. The Effect of Bonding Strategy and Aging on Adhesion to Primary Enamel: An InVitro Study. J Adhes Dent. 2023;25:18794.
Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, PalmaDibb RG. Shear bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel and dentin Thermocycling influence. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2005;16(8):72732.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-005-2609-2
PMid:15965742
Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, Misra A, Marangos O et al. Adhesive/Dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2010;38(6):19892003.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6
PMid:20195761 PMCid:PMC2871971
Pimentel de Oliveira R, de Paula BL, Ribeiro ME, Alves E, Costi HT, Silva C. Evaluation of the Bond Strength of SelfEtching Adhesive Systems Containing HEMA and 10MDP Monomers: Bond Strength of Adhesives Containing HEMA and 10MDP. Int J Dent. 2022;2022:5756649.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5756649
PMid:35722040 PMCid:PMC9205737
Hass V, Abuna G, Pinheiro Feitosa V, Martini EC, Sinhoreti MA, Furtado Carvalho R et al. SelfEtching Enamel Bonding Using Acidic Functional Monomers with Differentlength Carbon Chains and Hydrophilicity. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(6):497505.
Costa MP, Giacomini MC, Zabeu GS, Mosquim V, Dallavilla GG, Santos P et al. Impact of functional monomers, bioactive particles, and HEMA, on the adhesive performance of selfetch adhesive systems applied to simulated altered dentin. J Dent. 2024;151:105379.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105379
PMid:39341447
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galen Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





