Comparative Effects of Different Surface Treatments on Shear Bond Strength of Metal Brackets Bonded to Eroded Enamel: An in Vitro Study
Keywords:
Lasers; Solid-State; Orthodontic Brackets; Shear Strength; Tooth ErosionAbstract
Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of different surface treatments on shear bond strength (SBS) of metal brackets to eroded enamel. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 76 extracted premolars were immersed in Coca-Cola 4 times, each time for 2 minutes to cause enamel erosion. They were then randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=19) for surface treatment by acid etching (control), bur grinding plus acid etching, sandblasting plus acid etching, and erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Er:YAG) laser irradiation plus acid etching. Metal brackets were then bonded to the buccal surface of the teeth and after thermocycling, their SBS was measured in a universal testing machine. After debonding, the adhesive remnant index (ARI) score was determined under a stereomicroscope. SBS of higher than 6 was considered as optimal (Reynolds threshold). Results: The control group showed the highest, and the laser group showed the lowest SBS; however, the difference in SBS was not statistically significant among the four groups (P=0.35). Acid etching group had 2 cases of failure in SBS values, while other groups had none. The study groups had no significant difference in the ARI scores either (P=0.82); nonetheless, sandblasting and laser groups had the highest frequency of ARI score 3 (all adhesive remaining on the surface). Conclusion: Bur grinding, sandblasting, and Er:YAG laser irradiation did not significantly change the SBS of metal brackets to eroded enamel compared with acid etching alone, and all the tested methods yielded acceptable SBS values.
References
Koletsi D, Gerald Bradley T, Kavvadia K. Bonding and Debonding Considerations in Orthodontic Patients Presenting Enamel Structural Defects. Debonding and Fixed Retention in Orthodontics: An EvidenceBased Clinical Guide. 2023 Sep 5:4362.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119623984.ch3
Enax J, Fandrich P, Schulze zur Wiesche E, Epple M. The remineralization of enamel from saliva: A chemical perspective. Dentistry Journal. 2024 Oct 23;12(11):339.
https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12110339
PMid:39590389 PMCid:PMC11592461
Hicks J, GarciaGodoy F, Flaitz C. Biological factors in dental caries: role of saliva and dental plaque in the dynamic process of demineralization and remineralization (part 1). Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2004 Sep 1;28(1):4752.
https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.28.1.yg6m443046k50u20
PMid:14604142
YanFang Ren D. Dental erosion: etiology, diagnosis and prevention. ADA: The academy of dental therapeutic and stomatology. 2011;2011:7684.
Costenoble A, Vennat E, Attal JP, Dursun E. Bond strength and interfacial morphology of orthodontic brackets bonded to eroded enamel treated with calcium silicatesodium phosphate salts or resin infiltration. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(6):90916.
https://doi.org/10.2319/111315-764.1
PMid:26998810 PMCid:PMC8597344
Skalsky Jarkander M, Grindefjord M, Carlstedt K. Dental erosion, prevalence and risk factors among a group of adolescents in Stockholm County. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2018;19(1):2331.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0317-5
PMid:29327216 PMCid:PMC5807473
Jordão MC, Forti GM, Navarro RS, Freitas PM, Honório HM, Rios D. CO2 laser and/or fluoride enamel treatment against in situ/ex vivo erosive challenge. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24(3):2238.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720150399
PMid:27383703 PMCid:PMC5022222
Medeiros MID, Carlo HL, Santos RLD, Sousa FB, Castro RD, França RCS et al. TiF4 varnish protects the retention of brackets to enamel after in vitro mild erosive challenge. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170222.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0222
PMid:29768522 PMCid:PMC5958938
de Vasconcelos Leão L, Oliveira A, Moreira JC, Paranhos LR, de Mello Rode S, Nahsan FPS. The effect of aluminum oxide sandblasting and discs on shear bond strength of metal brackets rebonded in eroded enamel. Research, Society and Development. 2021;10(13):e34101320132e.
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i13.20132
Kasraei S, Kasraei P, Valizadeh S, Azarsina M. Rehardening of Eroded Enamel with CPPACFP Paste and CO(2) Laser Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:3304553.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3304553
PMid:34337003 PMCid:PMC8298158
Zhu JJ, Tang AT, Matinlinna JP, Hägg U. Acid etching of human enamel in clinical applications: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112(2):12235.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.08.024
PMid:24529655
Farhadifard H, RezaeiSoufi L, Farhadian M, Shokouhi P. Effect of different surface treatments on shear bond strength of ceramic brackets to old composite. Biomater Res. 2020;24(1):20.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-020-00199-y
PMid:33292632 PMCid:PMC7687813
Zarif Najafi H, Mousavi M, Nouri N, Torkan S. Evaluation of the effect of different surface conditioning methods on shear bond strength of metal brackets bonded to aged composite restorations. Int Orthod. 2019;17(1):808.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.009
PMid:30765237
Tantbirojn D, Huang A, Ericson MD, Poolthong S. Change in surface hardness of enamel by a cola drink and a CPPACP paste. J Dent. 2008;36(1):749.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.10.008
PMid:18045766
Kato MT, Magalhães AC, Rios D, Hannas AR, Attin T, Buzalaf MA. Protective effect of green tea on dentin erosion and abrasion. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17(6):5604.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572009000600004
PMid:20027426 PMCid:PMC4327513
Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British journal of orthodontics. 1975 Jul 1;2(3):1718.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
de Oliveira DSB, Santin GC, Honório HM, Rios D, Gatón PH, da Silva LAB et al. Single application of casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate pastebased paste prevents in vitro erosive wear. European Journal of General Dentistry. 2016;5(02):6973.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2278-9626.179544
Zarif Najafi H, Bagheri R, Pakshir HR, Tavakkoli MA, Torkan S. Effect of different surface treatment on the shear bond strength of metal brackets to bleached and desensitized enamel. Int Orthod. 2019;17(1):739.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2019.01.008
PMid:30770334
Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acidetch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85(4):33340.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8
PMid:6231863
Ozer T, Başaran G, Berk N. Laser etching of enamel for orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(2):1937.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.055
PMid:18675199
Dunn WJ, Davis JT, Bush AC. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er:YAG laserprepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 2005;21(7):61624.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.003
PMid:15978270
Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, Lampert F. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er,Cr:YSGG laserprepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28(4):3714.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1064
PMid:11344519
EstevesOliveira M, Zezell DM, Apel C, Turbino ML, Aranha AC, Eduardo Cde P et al. Bond strength of selfetching primer to bur cut, Er,Cr:YSGG, and Er:YAG lased dental surfaces. Photomed Laser Surg. 2007;25(5):37380.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2007.2044
PMid:17975950
Sallam RA, Arnout EA. Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket. Saudi Med J. 2018;39(9):9227.
https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2018.9.22793
PMid:30251736 PMCid:PMC6201001
Çokakoğlu S, Nalçacı R, Üşümez S, Malkoç S. Effects of Different Combinations of Er:YAG LaserAdhesives on Enamel Demineralization and Bracket Bond Strength. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(4):16470.
https://doi.org/10.1089/pho.2015.4041
PMid:26987047 PMCid:PMC4827284
Lopes MS, Pereira DL, de Oliveira Mota CCB, Amaral MM, Zezell DM, Gomes ASL. The lingual enamel morphology and bracket shear bond strength influenced by Nd:YAG laser and aluminum oxide sandblasting preconditioning. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(3):11518.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03418-x
PMid:32607827
Kiryk J, Matys J, Nikodem A, Burzynska K, GrzechLesniak K, Dominiak M et al. The Effect of Er:YAG Laser on a Shear Bond Strength Value of Orthodontic Brackets to EnamelA Preliminary Study. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(9): 2093.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14092093
PMid:33919108 PMCid:PMC8122582
Halwai HK, Kamble RH, Hazarey PV, Gautam V. Evaluation and comparision of the shear bond strength of rebonded orthodontic brackets with air abrasion, flaming, and grinding techniques: an in vitro study. Orthodontics (Chic). 2012;13(1):e19.
Baumgartner S, Koletsi D, Verna C, Eliades T. The Effect of Enamel Sandblasting on Enhancing Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(6):46373.
Oskoee PA, Kachoei M, Rikhtegaran S, Fathalizadeh F, Navimipour EJ. Effect of surface treatment with sandblasting and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on bonding of stainless steel orthodontic brackets to silver amalgam. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(2):e2926.
Reynolds I. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. British journal of orthodontics. 1975;2(3):1718.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0301228X.1975.11743666
Cehreli ZC, Kecik D, Kocadereli I. Effect of selfetching primer and adhesive formulations on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;127(5):5739.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.027
PMid:15877037
Shahverdi S, Canay S, Sahin E, Bilge A. Effects of different surface treatment methods on the bond strength of composite resin to porcelain. J Oral Rehabil. 1998;25(9):699705.
https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1998.00299.x
PMid:9758401
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galen Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





