Evaluation of Hemodialysis Efficacy for Serum and Salivary Clearance of Urea, Creatinine, and Uric Acid in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

Authors

Keywords:

Hemodialysis; Saliva; Urea; Creatinine; Uric Acid

Abstract

ackground: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive and irreversible loss of kidney function that may progress to end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis. While hemodialysis is an established life-saving therapy, simple methods to assess its adequacy are needed. This study evaluated changes in urea, creatinine, and uric acid levels in serum before and after hemodialysis and compared them with salivary levels to assess the adequacy of hemodialysis. Materials and Methods: A case-control study was conducted on 32 patients undergoing hemodialysis and 30 healthy controls. Blood and saliva samples were collected immediately before and after dialysis from patients and controls. Serum and salivary levels of markers were analyzed by biochemical methods. Serum and salivary levels of markers were compared between the patient group and the control group by t-test and the diagnostic accuracy of salivary markers compared to serum markers was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC). Results: There were significant differences between the serum and salivary levels of urea, creatinine, and uric acid in patients before and after hemodialysis, and also with the control group (P<0.05). There was a positive correlation between the serum and salivary levels of urea, creatinine and uric acid before hemodialysis, and creatinine after hemodialysis. The AUC for salivary urea and creatinine was 0.87 and 0.88, respectively, and the cut-off point for urea and creatinine was 55 mg/dL and 0.5 mg/dL, respectively. The ROC analysis for uric acid was not significant. Conclusion: This study showed that before hemodialysis, the changes in salivary urea, creatinine, and uric acid in CKD patients (in the fasting state) were similar to serum. Additionally, after hemodialysis, changes in salivary creatinine levels were similar to serum. Therefore, saliva analysis is suggested as a non-invasive alternative to serum analysis for assessment of the efficacy of hemodialysis.

References

Venkatapathy R, Govindarajan V, Oza N, Parameswaran S, Pennagaram Dhanasekaran B, Prashad KV. Salivary creatinine estimation as an alternative to serum creatinine in chronic kidney disease patients. International journal of nephrology. 2014;2014(1):742724.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/742724

PMid:24818023 PMCid:PMC4003770

Chen TK, Knicely DH, Grams ME. Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: a review. Jama. 2019;322(13):1294304.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14745

PMid:31573641 PMCid:PMC7015670

Little JW, Miller C, Rhodus NL. Dental management of the medically compromised patient. 9th ed St Louis: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.

Bagalad BS, Mohankumar K, Madhushankari G, Donoghue M, Kuberappa PH. Diagnostic accuracy of salivary creatinine, urea, and potassium levels to assess dialysis need in renal failure patients. Dental research journal. 2017;14(1):138.

https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.201138

PMid:28348612 PMCid:PMC5356383

Suresh G, Samata Y, Purnachandrarao Naik N, Vijay Kumar A. Analysis of blood and salivary urea levels in patients undergoing haemodialysis and kidney transplant. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2014;8(7):ZC18.

Lasisi TJ, Raji YR, Salako BL. Salivary creatinine and urea analysis in patients with chronic kidney disease: a case control study. BMC nephrology. 2016;17(1):10.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-016-0222-x

PMid:26775026 PMCid:PMC4715295

Khoshnoud S, Kouchesfahani HM, Nabiuni M. Evaluation of the protective effect of hydroalcoholic extract of raspberry fruit on aquaporin1 expression in rats kidney treated by methotrexate. Cell Journal (Yakhteh). 2017;19(2):306.

Kim Aleksandr L, Musin EV, Dubrovskii AV, Tikhonenko SA. Determination of urea concentration using ureasecontaining polyelectrolyte microcapsules. Analytical Methods. 2019;11(12):158590.

https://doi.org/10.1039/C8AY02481B

Zúñiga ME, Estremadoyro LO, León CP, Huapaya JA, Cieza JA. Validation of the salivary urea test as a method to diagnose chronic kidney disease. Journal of nephrology. 2012;25(3):431.

https://doi.org/10.5301/jn.5000022

PMid:21928227

Pandya D, Nagrajappa AK, Ravi K. Assessment and correlation of urea and creatinine levels in saliva and serum of patients with chronic kidney disease, diabetes and hypertension-a research study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2016;10(10):ZC58.

https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/20294.8651

PMid:27891460 PMCid:PMC5121806

Nunes LAS, Macedo DVd. Saliva as a diagnostic fluid in sports medicine: potential and limitations. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial. 2013;49:24755.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-24442013000400003

Nagler RM. Saliva analysis for monitoring dialysis and renal function. Oxford University Press: 14157; 2008.

https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2008.112136

PMid:18755903

Seethalakshmi C, Koteeswaran D, Chiranjeevi V. Correlation of serum and salivary biochemical parameters in end stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis in pre and postdialysis state. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2014;8(12):CC12.

Cheng P, Xia Y, Peng C, Zhou Z. Evaluation of dialysis in patients with endstage renal disease by salivary urea, creatinine and uric acid. Zhong nan da xue xue bao Yi xue ban= Journal of Central South University Medical sciences. 2013;38(12):12603.

Khan MQA, Khan DA, Saeed S. Monitoring the biochemical effect of haemodialysis in patients with endstage renal disease using saliva as an alternative to serum. Pak J Pathol. 2009;20(4):145-150.

SaiKiran PV, Dkv P, Aishwarya DR, Susmitha B. Role of Saliva as an Alternate Body Fluid in Evaluation of Kidney Function. The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India. 2022;70(4):112.

Rodrigues RPCB, Vieira WdA, Siqueira WL, Agostini BA, Moffa EB, Paranhos LR. Saliva as a tool for monitoring hemodialysis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Brazilian Oral Research. 2020;35:e016.

https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2021.vol35.0016

PMid:33331408

Pham TAV. Validation of the salivary urea and creatinine tests as screening methods of chronic kidney disease in Vietnamese patients. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica. 2017;75(8):5516.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2017.1356467

PMid:28724318

Renda R. Can salivary creatinine and urea levels be used to diagnose chronic kidney disease in children as accurately as serum creatinine and urea levels A case-control study. Renal failure. 2017;39(1):4527.

https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2017.1308256

PMid:28372505 PMCid:PMC6446173

Nogalcheva AN, Konstantinova D, Pechalova P. Salivary creatinine and urea in patients with endstage chronic kidney disease could not be used as diagnostic biomarkers for the effectiveness of dialysis treatment. G Ital Nefrol. 2018;35(6):2018.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-04

How to Cite

Hosseini, A., Abbasi, F., Mirzaii-Dizgah, I., & Afshar, R. (2026). Evaluation of Hemodialysis Efficacy for Serum and Salivary Clearance of Urea, Creatinine, and Uric Acid in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients. Galen Medical Journal, 15, e4098. Retrieved from https://journals.salviapub.com/index.php/gmj/article/view/4098

Issue

Section

Original Article