A Closer Look at the Validity and Reliability of the Persian Versions of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and Modified National Institute of Health Stroke Scale in Hospitalized Patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v8i.1587Keywords:
Validity, Reliability, Psychometric PropertiesAbstract
Â
Â
References
Dehghani R, Borhanihaghighi A, Shariat A, Nami M, Nazeri M, Foroughi AA, et al. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Versions of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale and Modified National Institute of Health Stroke Scale in Hospitalized Patients. Galen . 2019;8:1188. Yasir AS. Cross Cultural Adaptation & Psychometric Validation of Instruments: Step-wise. Arafat SY, Chowdhury HR, Qusar M, Hafez M. Cross cultural adaptation & psychometric validation of research instruments: A methodological review. Behavioral Health. 2016;5(3):129-36. Taghizadeh Z, Ebadi A, Montazeri A, Shahvari Z, Tavousi M, Bagherzadeh R. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh Health Monit. 2017;16(3):343-57. Davis LL. Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied nursing research. 1992;5(4):194-7. Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459-67. Haynes SN, Richard D, Kubany ES. Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):238.
![](https://journals.salviapub.com/public/journals/1/submission_1587_1587_coverImage_en_US.jpg)