Unveiling Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of CABG Recipients versus Non-CABG Patients in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)

Cardiovascular Outcomes in CABG versus Non-CABG Patients

Authors

  • Naser Aslanabadi Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Ahmad Separham Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Hormoz Golshani Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Elnaz Javanshir Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Razieh Parizad Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  • Ahmad Ahmadzadehpournaky Cardiovascular Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13i.3260

Keywords:

Acute Coronary Syndrome; Coronary Balloon Angioplasty; Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Abstract

Background: The history of bypass surgery for coronary arteries and subsequent coronary angioplasty is a crucial and vital issue for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aims to investigate and compare the occurrence of cardiovascular events in patients with a history of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) versus those without such a history, specifically focusing on individuals diagnosed with ACS. Materials and Methods: This cohort study was conducted at Madani Hospital in Tabriz, Iran. Patients diagnosed with ACS who were hospitalized and underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) from the beginning of 2018 to the beginning of 2020 were included. The records for follow-up regarding mortality and cardiovascular events were documented for the next three years (2020 to 2023). Subsequently, patients were categorized into two groups: those with a history of CABG and those without a history of CABG. Patients of each study group were divided into two groups: ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEA)CS/primary PCI and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS)/PCI, a total of approximately 473 cases were collected. The study groups were compared in terms of in-hospital and long-term cardiovascular events as well as other clinical outcomes.​ Results: A comparison of hospital and long-term events between the CABG group and the control group demonstrated a significant difference only in cases of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI)/ACS in long-term events (P=0.001). Additionally, comparing hospital and long-term events in the CABG group and the STEACS/NSTEACS control group revealed a significant difference only in cases of recurrent MI/ACS in long-term events (P=0.05). Conclusion: Patients with a history of CABG may face a higher risk of cardiovascular events, especially in recurrent MI/ACS. A thorough examination and closer monitoring of this patient group are needed to ensure improvement and mitigate the risks associated with potential complications arising from previous CABG surgeries.

References

Malakar AK, Choudhury D, Halder B, Paul P, Uddin A, Chakraborty S. A review on coronary artery disease, its risk factors, and therapeutics. Journal of Cell Physiol. 2019;234(10):16812-23.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.28350

PMid:30790284

Bhatt DL, Lopes RD, Harrington RA. Diagnosis and treatment of acute coronary syndromes: a review. JAMA. 2022;327(7):662-75.

https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.0358

PMid:35166796

Makki N, Brennan TM, Girotra S. Acute coronary syndrome. J Intensive Care Med. 2015;30(4):186-200.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066613503294

PMid:24047692

Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, Lucia A. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(13):256.

https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.06.33

PMid:27500157 PMCid:PMC4958723

Members WG, Mozaffarian D, Benjamin EJ, Go AS, Arnett DK, Blaha MJ, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2016;133(4):447-54.

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000366

PMid:26811276

Ralapanawa U, Sivakanesan R. Epidemiology and the magnitude of coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndrome: a narrative review. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2021;11(2):169.

https://doi.org/10.2991/jegh.k.201217.001

PMid:33605111 PMCid:PMC8242111

Brown JC, Gerhardt TE, Kwon E. Risk factors for coronary artery disease. 2020.

Rocha EA. Fifty years of coronary artery bypass graft surgery Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery. SciELO Brasil. 2017;32(4):II-I.

https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2017-0104

PMid:28977193 PMCid:PMC5613722

Bench TJ. The impact of previous revascularization on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2013;25(4):166-9.

Li Y, Hong M, Liu G. Changes in the quality of life, psychological status, medication compliance, and prognosis of patients with acute myocardial infarction after PCI by applying PDCA cycle management model. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021(1):7318653.

https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7318653

PMid:34712348 PMCid:PMC8548087

Lee MM, Petrie MC, Rocchiccioli P, Simpson J, Jackson CE, Corcoran DS, et al. Invasive versus medical management in patients with prior coronary artery bypass surgery with a non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(8):e007830.

Al-Aqeedi R, Sulaiman K, Al Suwaidi J, AlHabib K, El-Menyar A, Panduranga P, et al. Characteristics, management and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome and prior coronary artery bypass surgery: findings from the second Gulf Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2011;13(6):611-8.

https://doi.org/10.1510/icvts.2011.274571

PMid:21920933

Iqbal J, Kwok CS, Kontopantelis E, de Belder MA, Ludman PF, Giannoudi M, et al. Outcomes following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016;9(4):e003151.

https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003151

PMid:27069103

Kohl LP, Garberich RF, Yang H, Sharkey SW, Burke MN, Lips DL, et al. Outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with previous coronary bypass surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(9):981-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.04.010

PMid:25234670

Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF, Pocock SJ, Morice M-C, Puskas J, et al. Five-year outcomes after PCI or CABG for left main coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(19):1820-30.

https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1909406

PMid:31562798

Chen YW, Lee WC, Fang HY, Sun CK, Sheu JJ. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery brings better benefits to heart failure hospitalization for patients with severe coronary artery disease and reduced ejection fraction. Diagnostics. 2022 ;12(9):2233.

https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12092233

PMid:36140634 PMCid:PMC9497955

Habib RH, Dimitrova KR, Badour SA, Yammine MB, El-Hage-Sleiman A-KM, Hoffman DM, et al. CABG versus PCI: greater benefit in long-term outcomes with multiple arterial bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(13):1417-27.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.07.060

PMid:26403338 PMCid:PMC5473156

Teixeira R, Lourenço C, António N, Jorge E, Baptista R, Saraiva F, et al. Can we improve outcomes in patients with previous coronary artery bypass surgery admitted for acute coronary syndrome? Rev Esp Cardiol (English Edition). 2010;63(5):554-63.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-8932(10)70117-2

Avdikos G, Michas G, Smith SW. From Q/Non-Q Myocardial Infarction to STEMI/NSTEMI: Why It's Time to Consider Another Simplified Dichotomy; a Narrative Literature Review. Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine. 2022;10(1):e78.

Elbarasi E, Goodman SG, Yan RT, Welsh RC, Kornder J, Wong GC, et al. Management patterns of non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes in relation to prior coronary revascularization. Am Heart J. 2010;159(1):40-6.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.09.019

PMid:20102865

Kim MS, Wang TY, Ou F-S, Klein AJ, Hudson PA, Messenger JC, et al. Association of prior coronary artery bypass graft surgery with quality of care of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With the Guidelines. Am Heart J. 2010;160(5):951-7.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.07.025

PMid:21095285

Mahmoud SES, Shahin M, Yousif N, Denegri A, Dahab LHA, Lüscher TF. Cardiovascular risk profile, presentation and management outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes after coronary artery bypass grafting. Current Problems in Cardiology. 2022;47(11):101078.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2021.101078

PMid:34902394

Downloads

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Aslanabadi , N., Separham, A., Golshani, H., Javanshir, E., Parizad, R., & Ahmadzadehpournaky, A. (2024). Unveiling Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Comparative Analysis of CABG Recipients versus Non-CABG Patients in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS): Cardiovascular Outcomes in CABG versus Non-CABG Patients. Galen Medical Journal, 13, e3260. https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.v13i.3260

Issue

Section

Original Article