Predictive 3D Modeling of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Using Machine Learning Algorithms: A Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31661/gmj.vi.4014Keywords:
Predictive 3D Modeling; Orthognathic Surgery; Machine Learning AlgorithmsAbstract
Background: Orthognathic surgery is one of the main corrective treatments in patients with maxillofacial deformities, performed for functional or aesthetic reasons. The aim of this systematic review is to examine and analyze studies published between 2020 and 2025 on the use of machine learning algorithms in 3D modeling to predict orthognathic surgery outcomes.
Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review of articles published between 2021 and 2025. To find relevant articles, the Google Scholar and PubMed databases were searched. The reference lists of relevant articles were also manually checked to ensure comprehensiveness of the search. Inclusion criteria for the systematic review were original studies published between 2020 and 2025, studies that used machine learning or deep learning algorithms to predict orthognathic surgery outcomes using 3D modeling, articles published in English, and studies with access to the full text of the article.
Results: A total of 42 articles were identified. After careful review, 13 articles were included as eligible studies in the final analysis. The flow chart of study selection in PRISMA format is provided. All studies used machine learning algorithms such as deep neural networks, reinforcement learning, random forest, or graph-based models to predict orthognathic surgery outcomes. Most studies used 3D facial models or CBCT images for preoperative design and prediction of postoperative outcomes. All studies were assessed based on quality criteria.
Conclusion: The findings of this review demonstrate that new digital technologies, particularly artificial intelligence, 3D modeling, and virtual planning, are playing an increasingly important role in the transformation of maxillofacial and cosmetic surgical care.
References
Birbe J. Orthognathic surgery for aesthetic and functional outcomes: a multidisciplinary perspective. Med Res Arch. 2025;13(4):6394.
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i4.6394
Wu TY, Lin HH, Lo LJ, Ho CT. Postoperative outcomes of two and threedimensional planning in orthognathic surgery: A comparative study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(8):110111.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.04.012
PMid:28528114
Kim IH, Jeong J, Kim JS, Lim J, Cho JH, Hong M et al. Predicting orthognathic surgery results as postoperative lateral cephalograms using graph neural networks and diffusion models. Nature Communications. 2025;16(1):2586.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-57669-x
PMid:40091067 PMCid:PMC11911408
Motamedian SR, Mohaghegh S, Niazmand M, MohammadRahimi H, Ahmadi N, Yaseri M et al. Application of Artificial Intelligence in Orthognathic Surgery: A Scoping Review. Biomed Res Int. 2025;2025:8284581.
https://doi.org/10.1155/bmri/8284581
PMid:40538834 PMCid:PMC12178734
Li Z, Wang L. Multitask reinforcement learning and explainable AIDriven platform for personalized planning and clinical decision support in orthodonticorthognathic treatment. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):24502.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09236-z
PMid:40628824 PMCid:PMC12238254
Elfanagely O, Toyoda Y, Othman S, Mellia JA, Basta M, Liu T et al. Machine Learning and Surgical Outcomes Prediction: A Systematic Review. J Surg Res. 2021;264:34661.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.045
PMid:33848833
Ahmadi S, Chaurasia B. Challenges of craniofacial surgery in low and middleincome countries. Neurosurg Rev. 2024;47(1):567.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-02808-z
PMid:39242430
Yusuf M, Atal I, Li J, Smith P, Ravaud P, Fergie M, Callaghan M, Selfe J. Reporting quality of studies using machine learning models for medical diagnosis: a systematic review. BMJ open. 2020 Mar 1;10(3):e034568.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034568
PMid:32205374 PMCid:PMC7103817
Bao J, Zhang X, Xiang S, Liu H, Cheng M, Yang Y et al. Deep LearningBased Facial and Skeletal Transformations for Surgical Planning. J Dent Res. 2024;103(8):80919.
https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241253186
PMid:38808566
Cheng M, Zhang X, Wang J, Yang Y, Li M, Zhao H et al. Prediction of orthognathic surgery plan from 3D cephalometric analysis via deep learning. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):161.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02844-z
PMid:36934241 PMCid:PMC10024836
Grillo R, Reis BAQ, Lima BC, MelhemElias F. Shaping the 4D frontier in maxillofacial surgery with faceMesh evolution. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;125(3s):101843.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101843
PMid:38521241
Jindanil T, BurlacuVatamanu OE, Meyns J, Meewis J, Fontenele RC, de Llano Perula MC et al. Automated orofacial virtual patient creation: A proof of concept. Journal of Dentistry. 2024;150:105387.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105387
PMid:39362299
Kelly SS, Suarez CA, Mirsky NA, Slavin BV, Brochu B, Vivekanand Nayak V, et al. Application of 3D printing in cleft lip and palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(3): 10719.
https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010294
PMid:38738906
Lee SJ, Yoo JY, Woo SY, Yang HJ, Kim Je, Huh KH et al. A complete digital workflow for planning, simulation, and evaluation in orthognathic surgery. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021;10(17):4000.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10174000
PMid:34501449 PMCid:PMC8432567
Lin HH, Kuo JC, Lo LJ, Ho CT. Optimizing orthognathic surgery: Leveraging the average skull as a dynamic template for surgical simulation and planning in 30 patient cases. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2023;12(24):7758.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12247758
PMid:38137827 PMCid:PMC10743958
Qiu B, van der Wel H, Kraeima J, Hendrik Glas H, Guo J, Borra RJH, et al. Robust and accurate mandible segmentation on dental CBCT scans affected by metal artifacts using a prior shape model. J Pers Med. 2021;11(5):404.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050364
PMid:34062762 PMCid:PMC8147374
Zhou KX, Patel M, Shimizu M, Wang E, Prisman E, Thang T. Development and validation of a novel craniofacial statistical shape model for the virtual reconstruction of bilateral maxillary defects. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024;53(2):14655.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2023.06.002
PMid:37391321
Mansoor M, Ibrahim AF. The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025;14(8):2698.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082698
PMid:40283528 PMCid:PMC12028257
Parsa S, Basagaoglu B, Mackley K, Aitson P, Kenkel J, Amirlak B. Current and Future Photography Techniques in Aesthetic Surgery. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum. 2022;4:ojab050.
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojab050
PMid:35156020 PMCid:PMC8830310
Shujaat S, Bornstein MM, Price JB, Jacobs R. Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology. 2021;50(7):20210268.
https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210268
PMid:34520239 PMCid:PMC8474138
Jebin AA, Prabhuji MLV, Varghese MS. Insights on artificial intelligence in periodontal disease diagnosis, management, implant therapy, and reinforcing periodontal health: shortcomings, concerns, and ethical quandaries. Santosh Univ J Health Sci. 2024;10(2):123-131.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Galen Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





