Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shear Bond Strength after Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Methods for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding

Authors

  • seyed mohammad mahdi mirmohammadi Assistant Professor, Department of oral & maxillofacial surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed university,Tehran, Iran.
  • Seyed Mohammad Mahdi Mirmohammadi Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Shahed University,Tehran, Iran
  • Ali Ghanati Dentistry Faculty, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya(UIC), Barcelona, Spain
  • Elnaz Tavazozadeh UCLA School of Dentistry, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
  • Kourosh  Farhadtouski School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Tehran Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Keywords:

Shear Bond Strength; Photodynamic Therapy; Systematic Review; Orthodontic Bracket

Abstract

Background: To systematically evaluate the effect of photodynamic therapy (PDT) on shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic brackets compared to conventional bonding methods through meta-analysis of in vitro studies. Materials and Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, synthesized in vitro studies comparing the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets following photodynamic therapy pretreatment versus conventional methods, utilizing a comprehensive, peer-reviewed search strategy across four databases up to December 2025. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed using Hedges’ g with 95% confidence intervals. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistic and Q-test. Subgroup analysis by photosensitizer type, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias assessment were conducted with subsequent trim-fill adjustments. Results: Eight in vitro studies comprising 13 PDT-control comparisons with 317 samples were included. Overall meta-analysis revealed significantly lower SBS for PDT groups compared to controls (Hedges’ g = -4.17, 95% CI: -6.350 to -3.361, P < 0.001). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I² = 93.3%, Q = 166.645, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed Methylene Blue PDT had the strongest negative effect (g = -5.795, P < 0.001), also Riboflavin PDT (k=3) demonstrated a significant negative effect (g = -3.54, P = 0.012). Mean SBS was 15.27 MPa for PDT groups versus 19.67 MPa for controls. Significant publication bias was detected (Egger’s test: P = 0.0003); while trim-fill justification remained significant in case of significantly lower SBS for PDT groups compared to controls. Conclusion: PDT, particularly with Methylene Blue photosensitizer, significantly reduces shear bond strength compared to conventional methods. Curcumin-based PDT shows more favorable bond strength profiles. Clinical application requires careful consideration of photosensitizer selection and bonding protocol optimization.

References

Stájer A, Kajári S, Gajdács M, Musah-Eroje A, Baráth Z. Utility of Photodynamic Therapy in Dentistry: Current Concepts. Dent J (Basel). 2020;8(2):43.

https://doi.org/10.3390/dj8020043

PMid:32392793 PMCid:PMC7345245

Suresh N, Joseph B, Sathyan P, Sweety VK, Waltimo T, Anil S. Photodynamic therapy: An emerging therapeutic modality in dentistry. Bioorg Med Chem. 2024;114:117962.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmc.2024.117962

PMid:39442490

Gholami L, Shahabi S, Jazaeri M, Hadilou M, Fekrazad R. Clinical applications of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in dentistry. Front Microbiol. 2023;13:1020995.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.1020995

PMid:36687594 PMCid:PMC9850114

Marotti J, Tortamano P, Cai S, Ribeiro MS, Franco JE, de Campos TT. Photodynamic therapy for peri-implantitis: in vitro study. Lasers Med Sci. 2013.

Olek M, Machorowska-Pieniążek A, Stós W, Kalukin J, Bartusik-Aebisher D, Aebisher D, Cieślar G, Kawczyk-Krupka A. Photodynamic Therapy in Orthodontics: A Literature Review. Pharmaceutics. 2021 May 14;13(5):720.

https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050720

PMid:34068878 PMCid:PMC8156301

Rosa EP, Murakami-Malaquias-Silva F, Schalch TO, Teixeira DB, Horliana RF, Tortamano A, Tortamano IP, Buscariolo IA, Longo PL, Negreiros RM, Bussadori SK, Motta LJ, Horliana ACRT. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy and periodontal treatment in patients with gingivitis and fixed orthodontic appliances: Protocol of randomized, controlled, double-blind study. Medicine. 2020 Apr;99(14):e19429.

https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019429

PMid:32243363 PMCid:PMC7220758

Pourhajibagher M, Salehi Vaziri A, Takzaree N, Ghorbanzadeh R. Physico-mechanical and antimicrobial properties of an orthodontic adhesive containing cationic curcumin doped zinc oxide nanoparticles subjected to photodynamic therapy. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2019 Mar;25:239-246.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.002

PMid:30611862

Khan E, Alshahrani I, Kamran MA, Samran A, Alqerban A, Rehman SA. Influence of phototherapy on adhesive strength and microleakage of bleached enamel bonded to orthodontic brackets: An in-vitro study. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2019 Mar;25:344-348.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2019.01.013

PMid:30648641

Kamran MA, Almoammar S, Alnazeh AA, Alshahrani A, Alhaizaey AHA, Alshahrani I. Natural and synthetic photosensitizers activated by photodynamic therapy on enamel reconditioning rebonded to metallic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26:9089-9097.

Alnazeh AA, Kamran MA, Alshahrani A, Amer OM, Anzi RAK. Photodynamic therapy and argon laser treatment of white spot lesions: Effects on enamel remineralization and orthodontic bracket bond strength. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023;42:103568.

Mirhashemi A, Hormozi S, Noroozian M, Chiniforush N. The effect of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket: An in vitro study. Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy. 2021 Jun 1;34:102244.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102244

PMid:33677068

Alshami AA, Sawan NM, Alhamed SA, Helmi M, Mustafa OSE, Alsagob EI. Shear bond strength of resin modified glass ionomer cement following photodynamic therapy, Er,Cr:YSGG and chlorhexidine in hypoplastic primary teeth. J Dent.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2009 Jul 20;339:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

PMid:19622551 PMCid:PMC2714657

Paiva Barbosa V, Bastos Silveira B, Amorim dos Santos J, Monteiro MM, Coletta RD, De Luca Canto G, Stefani CM, Guerra EN. Critical appraisal tools used in systematic reviews of in vitro cell culture studies: a methodological study. Research synthesis methods. 2023 Nov;14(6):776-93.

https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1657

PMid:37464457

Hameed MS, Alkahtani ZM, Ajmal M, Kamran MA, Mannakandath ML, Alshahrani I. Bond assessment of enamel conditioned with Er, Cr: YSGG laser and methylene blue photosensitizer activated by photodynamic therapy to orthodontic metallic brackets. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2021;36:102513.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102513

PMid:34469793

Alqerban A. Effectiveness of Riboflavin and Rose Bengal Photosensitizer Modified Adhesive Resin for Orthodontic Bonding. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(1):48.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ph14010048

PMid:33435179 PMCid:PMC7826870

Alnazeh AA, Kamran MA, Alshahrani A, Amer OM, Anze RA. Photodynamic therapy and argon laser treatment of white spot lesions: Effects on enamel remineralization and orthodontic bracket bond strength. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology. 2026 Nov 22:113316.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2025.113316

PMid:41349299

Alkhudhairy F, Neiva GF. Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG, Nd: YAG, and diode laser against different photosensitizers on tensile and shear bond strength of bonded composite to caries affected dentin. European Review for Medical & Pharmacological Sciences. 2023 Sep 15;27(18).

de Oliveira AB, Ferrisse TM, Marques RS, et al. Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Microorganisms Responsible for Dental Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(14):3585.

https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20143585

PMid:31340425 PMCid:PMC6678311

Schweigert TBMO, Afonso JPR, da Palma RK, et al. Influence of Photosensitizer on Photodynamic Therapy for Peri-Implantitis: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceutics. 2024;16(3):307.

https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics16030307

PMid:38543201 PMCid:PMC10975756

Yan Y, Rotundo R, Suvan J, et al. Photodynamic therapy and peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Oral Health. 2025;6:1614982.

https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2025.1614982

PMid:40703980 PMCid:PMC12283991

Baghani Z, Karrabi M, Assarzadeh H. Dentition Type as a Determinant of Microbial Load Reduction by Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Deep Dentin Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Dent J Oral Sci. 2023.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-21

How to Cite

seyed mohammad mahdi mirmohammadi, Mirmohammadi, S. M. M., Ghanati, A., Tavazozadeh, E., & Farhadtouski, K. (2026). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Shear Bond Strength after Photodynamic Therapy Versus Conventional Methods for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding. Galen Medical Journal, 15, e4164. Retrieved from https://journals.salviapub.com/index.php/gmj/article/view/4164

Issue

Section

Review Article