The Role of Surface-Modified Titanium Scaffolds and Implants in Tissue Engineering for Bone Healing in Maxillofacial and Reconstructive Surgery
Keywords:
Titanium; Surface Modification; Osseointegration; Maxillofacial Reconstruction; Tissue Engineering; 3D PSrintingAbstract
Titanium and titanium alloys are widely used in maxillofacial and reconstructive surgery because they combine mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, manufacturability, and long-term biocompatibility. Their applications include dental implants, mandibular reconstruction plates, titanium mesh, patient-specific implants, orbital reconstruction systems, cranial implants, zygomatic implants, and additively manufactured porous scaffolds. Although titanium provides reliable mechanical stability, its biological performance depends strongly on the surface–tissue interface rather than on bulk material properties alone. Surface chemistry, oxide-layer characteristics, roughness, wettability, and micro/nanotopography influence protein adsorption, osteoblast adhesion, macrophage phenotype, angiogenesis, bacterial adhesion, and osseointegration. This narrative review critically synthesizes current knowledge on surface-modified titanium scaffolds and implants for bone healing in maxillofacial and reconstructive surgery, with emphasis on biological mechanisms, clinical relevance, translational limitations, and future directions. The available evidence supports the concept that optimized titanium surfaces can promote osteogenesis, vascularization, osteoimmunomodulation, and antibacterial activity, but clinical translation remains limited by heterogeneous surface characterization, simplified preclinical models, and insufficient long-term clinical data.
References
Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J. Osseointegrated titanium implants: requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-170.
https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
PMid:7246093
Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ. 2003;67(8):932-949.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.8.tb03681.x
PMid:12959168
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20 Suppl 4:172-184.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x
PMid:19663964
Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res. 2004;83(7):529-533.
https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
PMid:15218041
Lim HK, Choi YJ, Choi WC, Song IS, Lee UL. Reconstruction of maxillofacial bone defects using patient-specific long-lasting titanium implants. Sci Rep. 2022;12:7538.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11200-0
PMid:35534499 PMCid:PMC9085892
Slavin BV, Ehlen Q, Costello JP II, Nayak VV, et al. 3D printing applications for craniomaxillofacial reconstruction: a sweeping review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2023;9(12):6586-6609.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c01171
PMid:37982644 PMCid:PMC11229092
Pai AG, Prabhu SS. Patient-specific implants for intraoral and maxillofacial reconstruction: a scoping review on customization and fabrication methods. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;47. doi:10.1186/s40902-025-00485-6.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-025-00485-6
PMid:41055870 PMCid:PMC12504169
Li Y, Liu H, Wang C, Yan R, Xiang L, Mu X, et al. 3D printing titanium grid scaffold facilitates osteogenesis in mandibular segmental defects. NPJ Regen Med. 2023;8:38.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-023-00308-0
PMid:37488125 PMCid:PMC10366137
Xia H, Chen B, Shi Y, Li C, Yin Z, Xu Y, et al. Advances and challenges in 3D-printed microporous titanium alloy implants for reconstruction of humeral segmental bone defects. Discov Mater. 2026;6:33.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-025-00514-1
Barberi J, Spriano S. Titanium and protein adsorption: an overview of mechanisms and effects of surface features. Materials. 2021;14(7):1590.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14071590
PMid:33805137 PMCid:PMC8037091
Yang Y, Cavin R, Ong JL. Protein adsorption on titanium surfaces and their effect on osteoblast attachment. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67(1):344-349.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.10578
PMid:14517894
Olivares-Navarrete R, Hyzy SL, Hutton DL, Erdman CP, Wieland M, Boyan BD, et al. Direct and indirect effects of microstructured titanium substrates on mesenchymal stem cell differentiation toward the osteoblast lineage. Biomaterials. 2010;31(10):2728-2735.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.029
PMid:20053436 PMCid:PMC2821717
Wu B, Tang Y, Wang K, Zhou X, Xiang L. Nanostructured titanium implant surface facilitating osseointegration from protein adsorption to osteogenesis: the example of TiO₂ nanotube arrays. Int J Nanomedicine. 2022;17:1865-1879.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S362720
PMid:35518451 PMCid:PMC9064067
Pitchai M, Ipe D, Tadakamadla S, Hamlet S. Titanium implant surface effects on adherent macrophage phenotype: a systematic review. Materials. 2022;15(20):7314.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15207314
PMid:36295379 PMCid:PMC9609829
Gkioka M, Rausch-Fan X. Antimicrobial effects of metal coatings or physical, chemical modifications of titanium dental implant surfaces for prevention of peri-implantitis: a systematic review of in vivo studies. Antibiotics. 2024;13(9):908.
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090908
PMid:39335082 PMCid:PMC11428254
Yu J, Wang H, Zhuang Y, et al. Antibacterial adhesion strategy for dental titanium implant surface: from mechanisms to application. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(4):169.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13040169
PMid:36278638 PMCid:PMC9589972
Zhang H, Wu Z, Wang Z, Yan X, Duan X, Sun H. Advanced surface modification techniques for titanium implants: a review of osteogenic and antibacterial strategies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025;13:1549439.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1549439
PMid:40177619
Xue T, Attarilar S, Liu S, Liu J, Song X, Li L, et al. Surface modification techniques of titanium and its alloys to functionally optimize their biomedical properties: thematic review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8:603072.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.603072
PMid:33262980 PMCid:PMC7686851
Bakitian FA, et al. A comprehensive review of contemporary methods for titanium implant surface modification. Materials. 2024.
Wen X, Wang X, Zhang N. Micro-arc oxidation and its potential for improving the properties of titanium implants. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1282590.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1282590
PMid:38026886 PMCid:PMC10662315
Ming X, et al. Micro-arc oxidation in titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Coatings. 2023;13(12):2064.
https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13122064
Lee JK, Choi DS, Jang I, Choi WY. Improved osseointegration of dental titanium implants by TiO₂ nanotube arrays with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a pilot in vivo study. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015;10:1145-1154.
https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S78138
PMid:25709438 PMCid:PMC4330039
Tardelli JDC, Schiavon MA, Dos Reis AC. Chitosan coatings on titanium-based implants-from development to characterization and behavior: a systematic review. Carbohydr Polym. 2024;344:122496.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2024.122496
PMid:39218539
López-Valverde N, Flores-Fraile J, Ramírez JM, et al. Role of chitosan in titanium coatings: trends and new perspectives. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:907589.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.907589
PMid:35935477 PMCid:PMC9354072
Pietzka S, Wenzel M, Winter K, Wilde F, Schramm A, Ebeling M, Kasper R, Scheurer M, Sakkas A. Comparison of anatomical preformed titanium implants and patient-specific CAD/CAM implants in the primary reconstruction of isolated orbital fractures: a retrospective study. J Pers Med. 2023;13(5):846.
https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13050846
PMid:37241016 PMCid:PMC10222691
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Galen Medical Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





